Unseen Pentagon Footage?!!?! Wow , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 61 times


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:39 PM by JipStix
reply to post by cashlink



Exactly. I'd like to see the original video, or a better quality video. The more pixels there are the more information there is to analyze.

kudos!


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:42 PM by rickyrrr
reply to post by matrix911




I took a second look at this video and the framerate appears to be 4fps.

This is based on observation of the original video, where the police car is seen "skipping" about four times per second. All the action in the video appears to be 4fps

based on that, it is plausible for the airplane to have travelled about 182 feet in a frame if it was traveling at 500mph.

By the way, playing this video frame by frame from youtube or from any other source that plays at 30fps would result in about 6 - 7 frames of stillness as each frame comes in. With interpolation the last few of those 6-7 frames might show what is about to come on the next frame.


The fireballs would not be seen "growing" because by the time they are shown they have already had some time to grow due to the missing time between frames.

As far as I can see there is nothing in this video to suggest foul play.

-rrr


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:48 PM by arizonascott
reply to post by JipStix



No slowing down

I said the the missle was cruising along at its cruising speed, then at the programmed distance made a manuever and increased speed.

The optical illusion from this would look like a pause or a visual jolt at the point of increased speed and manuever.

Is that better?

As for the other debate:
If there are missing frames in the video presented, then a complete pause would be explained. Obviously those missing video frames and the time stamp would have to be determined by someone who is an expert at breaking down video footage and layering, also by accessing the original.

I would think this video and the truth is important enough to have that done.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by arizonascott]


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 03:33 PM by cashlink
reply to post by logician magician



Ya! I was impressed of seeing this huge 757 flying and stopping! Did you see the windows with the passengers waving, looks like one of the windows needed cleaning did you see the woman in the 8th window reading her book, I think the title was my pet goat.

Oh ya! There is sooo much to see I notice the grass under the (cough!) plane needed to be cut there is sooo much detail did you notice that too.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 04:07 PM by HugmyRek
You know how the government doesn't like to appear weak or easily entered.

Maybe the whole plane fabrication and film doctoring was to cover the embarrassent of how easy it was for someone to walk up, stand on the pentagon lawn, and fire a rocket laucher into the building. Or something similar-surface to air aimed linear.

It is a possibility. The problem when the government covered up this 'security breach'-if the case- is that then everyone jumped to blame the government for the problem in an intentional you did it sort of way.

I bet they wished they had the foresight on that advising 'whoops!".

Why would dc hit at it's best? I don't think they did. It just doesn't add up that we hit at ourselves, ourselves. It knocked out too much of the talent that keeps this place the former top of its game-and no one would agree to that.

It took out the people who would be able most likely to know who had done it. And now the dead can't speak. The people with those skills. DOD skills. Maybe they were on to something. It took out a large working force of our defense. Weakening our defenses.

Would we do that to ourselves? Begs the question: who are we? We are a nation divided claiming undivision. Anyone can get in-all they have to do is lie: a song and dance. In which case the only question is did who did it have citizenship. At which point there is the possibility by default that we hit at ourselves.

soapbox rant-sorry op. GRRRREAT FOOTAGE.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 04:13 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by arizonascott



I just want to point out that there is a staggering amount of evidence and expert testimonial proving that it was in fact the planes that caused the damages to all the buildings on 9/11. Now, I'm open to other possibilities, but one has to retain a certain degree of skepticism and look at evidence objectively, or risks looking like an idiot. Ask yourself which is more likely: the government orchestrated a massive attack on it's self, killing thousands of it's citizens and destroying one of it's greatest landmarks and symbols of capitalism... and for what? the ability to start a war in Afghanistan? ...wealthy Afghanistan, with all it's abundant and valuable natural resources... - OR - Did some lonely person with nothing better to do edit some videos he downloaded with any one of the several home video editing programs available today, so that he could get his fifteen minutes or prove his own lame and misconceived theory? Face it, in these times seeing is no longer believing. If you believe everything you see then you had better believe that there is a place called middle earth with elves, hobbits, goblins, orcs, ents, trolls, etc... any image can be manipulated on even mid-level consumer PC's. Don't be so quick to buy into every conspiracy theory you hear. Be smart. Think objectively. Look at the real evidence... peer reviewed evidence. Youtube and some jack ass living in his mom's basement don't count.

sorry to ruin the fun, kids.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 04:17 PM by ofhumandescent
reply to post by matrix911

I firmly believe that the Bush Administration orchestrated 911 to manipulate America into war and to justify stripping us of more of our freedoms.

The news media went along and handled out the information they were told to hand out to the people.

And the majority of Americans bought it.


www.whodidit.org...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags