Stevens ousted; Dems eye power of 60, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 19-11-2008 @ 07:47 AM by grover

Stevens ousted; Dems eye power of 60


www.politico.com
he Democratic pursuit of 60 Senate seats received new life Tuesday night after Alaska Democrat Mark Begich was declared the winner against Ted Stevens, the longest-serving Republican in the Senate.

Begich defeated the Senate giant by a 3,724-vote margin after absentee and early votes were counted, a stunning end to a 40-year Senate career marred by Stevens’ conviction on corruption charges a week before the election.

Begich’s victory gives Democrats their 58th Senate seat, with the party still awaiting a pending recount in the too-close-to-call Minnesota Senate race and the Georgia Senate runoff next month. If Democrats win those two seats, they will reach a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 07:58 AM by seagull
reply to post by grover



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

You are not alone in your ambivalence, grover. With control of that magnitude in Congress, and the President being Democrat as well...let's just say that the Dem's have no excuses now. It's theirs to do. No big bad boogie man in the White House to blame anymore...

Let's see if they truly have the right ideas.




As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.




reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 09:32 AM by nyk537
You might be right.

But it's scary as hell.



reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 01:37 PM by seagull
reply to post by Waldy



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

I might agree with you, if it weren't for the fact that it's all the same ole faces...nothing new, and no one new... The Dem's have had a working majority, or at least close to it, since the midterms in '06, what's changed? Any new policies? Has foreign policy changed a wit? Or domestic? Not so's I've noticed.

It would be wonderful if the new broom was an actual reality, but don't hold your breath.

I'll give President Obama, his cabinet, and his pet Congress their opportunity...but let's just say I'll believe it when I see it.




As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 01:59 PM by nyk537
reply to post by HunkaHunka



On the other side of my point though, at the end of these next 4 years, the Democrats will have nobody to point to the finger at this time.

The blame for the disaster they will create will be entirely their own. I just can't decide if it's worth it for the harm it will cause the country.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:04 PM by HunkaHunka
Originally posted by nyk537
reply to
post by HunkaHunka



On the other side of my point though, at the end of these next 4 years, the Democrats will have nobody to point to the finger at this time.

The blame for the disaster they will create will be entirely their own. I just can't decide if it's worth it for the harm it will cause the country.



I agree wholeheartedly. It was the reason I voted for Nader in 2000. The Dems were not representing the majority of their base, they were being much to centrist and almost right leaning.

I figured... hey.. if 4 or 8 years of W doesn't wake them up, nothing will. And well, they woke up.

All in all I think it's a good thing.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:06 PM by grover
Originally posted by nyk537
reply to
post by HunkaHunka


On the other side of my point though, at the end of these next 4 years, the Democrats will have nobody to point to the finger at this time.


It didn't stop the Republicans from blaming the Clinton's and Democrats for years after they
won
in 2000.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by grover]


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:12 PM by dariousg
reply to post by seagull



Exactly. We have heard all of the tell tale BS passed about pointing fingers here and there and there and even over there a bit. Now, especially if this happens, it will have to point soley at THEMSELVES. I do not like the idea of such power in one side of the house but hey, let's see what happens over the next couple years. If they turn things around and actually save this country from the damage the current administration has done then I may actually consider becoming a registered democrat!


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:19 PM by dariousg
Originally posted by nyk537
I disagree that it's a good thing.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love nothing more than to see a super majority of Democrats have to take the full blame for terrorizing this country. To see them have to look American in the eyes and admit their ideas were wrong.

I just can't stomach the sacrifices the country would have to make to reach that point.


Wow, when you said this you HAD to know you were going to get some replies (not necessarily good ones either).

Okay, this is where I stand. I like to think of myself as mostly conservative. I used to think of myself as republican but I no longer believe that party represents a truly conservative view.

Now, with that in mind, you are saying what you said with the intent of saying that the dems have been responsible for all that has happened over the past decade? I beg to differ. There is a REASON I am no longer a republican. It is because of the actions of the current republican administration.

They have steered this country into an unending war purely for profit. Profit for themselves and their friends. Period. If you have oil ties, you have become filthy rich because of this administration. If you work in the defense (Military Industrial Complex) you have become filthy rich because of this administration.

They have doctored intelligence reports so that they would have reason's to attack soveirgn nations and they have reinstated torture as a good way to obtain information. Even though it is WELL documented that information obtained from torture is about as worthless as used toilet paper. Yet, they insist that it is okay while still threatening anyone who dares to torture our troops or agents that may be caught in their own countries.

Such hypocrisy is what has made me sway from the republican party. This administration is packed full of criminals. People that would be tried for war crimes in any international court if the threat of the big bully America wasn't behind them. They have flaunted their enormous egos and have pushed allies into supporting illegal wars.

And yet you are blaming this on the democrats? Hmmm, I'm not a democrat but I don't quite see where you are gleaning that information from.

Please enlighten us.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 113 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 12 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 16 hours ago, 42 replies