I agree with everything Freeborn says re skinheads.

This issue is very interesting, though. There's an implication here that the authorities are behind the leak. Let us suppose that is so - should the fact that the majority of us find their views outrageous and unpleasant deny them the basic right to privacy that the rest of us enjoy? If so, why?

We all have our secrets - how would you feel if yours were broadcast over the web together with comprehensive contact details?

The flip side to which argument is: is a right to privacy a desireable thing if it protects a perceived threat to society? Where does the line get drawn?

LW

Originally posted by Nuevo
Immigration into the UK (from outside the EU) has always been fairly strict and has recently been made more difficult.

You raise some interesting points Nuevo, but a few I'd like to contest.

The Government can publish all of the polls and statistics they like, but what counts are the experiences and perceptions of the average man or woman. Britain is seen as a soft touch. Look at the waves of asylum seekers who've travelled through 20 safe EU countries to reach the 'fabled green Isle to the far North West'. I could list a number of unnacceptable case studies from my own experience - like residence automatically granted through arranged marriages between British men and Indian or Pakistani women... or the fact that barely a word of English spoken at my local carboot sales, or... well, you get the picture. Point is, I don't care what the Government says. I've never been to a country and witnessed as many non-native-language speakers as here in Britain. We're not strict by any calculation. In terms of EU members, it's our benefit system rather than border policy that's to blame for our inundation.

Originally posted by Nuevo
But perhaps the many British expats in Spain should learn Spanish and not hide away in their English communities, reading The Sun and eating Fish & Chips. We should practice what we preach for a change.

I fully agree there. Anyone who flees Britain and complains about migration into Britain is a hypocrite, particularly if they don't even speak the language of their new home nation.

Originally posted by Nuevo
If a wealthy Brit doesn't want to pay his taxes (taxes set via a democratically elected government), then I seriously doubt their claims to be a patriot if they run.
...
These same people also didn't care at all about the local white people's low wages and high unemployment. Bottom line: racists are self-serving, power control freaks.

I'll address these two together. Both those types of people are NOT patriots, no matter how racist they are . Patriotism is about loving your own folk, not hating others. You stick with your country through thick and thin.

Originally posted by Nuevo
The oft-cited decline of British culture is another myth.

No it isn't, or rather, it should be phrased differently. It's not so much a decline of British culture but more a loss of its sovereignty. It exists but no longer predominates. I do feel this is as much to do with Brits abandoning their culture as foreigners forcing theirs in. But there's a whole other issue related to that - the Globalist agenda's use of political correctness and white guilt to destroy the resolve of Brits. There are definitely pockets of people keeping traditions alive by gathering in pubs to play folk music, or by glorifying ancient history and myth in art, or by celebrating halloween, or speaking gaelic/brethonic - but more often than not those people feel they have to keep those things behind closed doors in order not to upset the politically correct climate, or be labelled 'racist' because they're celebrating their white forefather's traditions.

Originally posted by Nuevo
Many companies would simply fail without their labour force of low paid eastern Europeans. The local Brits are simply too lazy, claiming their many many benefits to get off their fat druggy arses and actually work for a living.

I argue this point more than any other, regularly. Yes, there are lazy scroungers, but mostly they simply have less incentive to gain from medial labour. To a Pole, minimum wage on a crappy job, for a temporary period, goes a long way to providing them a future in their home country. It does not go any way to providing a future in Britain for a Brit. British people aren't more lazy, they just have different requirements to foreigners. If you could buy a house by cleaning toilets for 20 years (like say, an Eastern European could) you'd do it. If not, why bother? It's important to note that the benefits system as exploited, proportionately at the very least, by foreign-born residents.

Originally posted by 44soulslayer
Just imagine how bizarre it would be for me to say "we" when referring to the British Raj controlling India, when in fact I come from India.

Absolutely. It works both ways and British Imperialism is no exception.

Originally posted by 44soulslayer
What I propose is a two-tier system where the British culture of the indigenous peoples of this country are iconicized and institutionalised. All the legal, political, religious framework of the state must be indigenous British in nature. Beyond that, it doesnt really matter if each community eats different food or listens to different music.

Seems the most sensible solution. I think the more absolutist types such as the BNP would find this an effective long terms solution too. Part of the reason that many other European countries are bypassed by immigrants looking to settle is that we're overly tolerant here - to the point of our detriment. If it were made clear that British law and religion is not to be challenged or superceded, many immigrants might find this island a less desireable destination. We'd then receive only those who respect the country's traditions and want to live somewhere that allows a certain freedom of culture and belief.

Here we have a great potential conspiracy, and yet all most people wish to discuss is how racist and evil BNP members are.

How exactly does it happen that a group of people espousing nationalism, is precluded from employment with and in the British power structure? In America this was known as McCarthyism when practiced against the Communists, perhaps a bit of an Eye for an Eye by the Globalists against the Nationalists?

Why is this document being released now? Could it be Obama's election driving fears of a resurgence of British nationalism? Or economic hardships on the horizon and the inevitable blame that will be laid at the feet of those currently in power? A preemptive show of force and of the repercussions to those that would dare oppose the current ruling elite?

Instead all that's said by the useful idiots, which is supposed to be meaningful, is that the BNP is a Racist organization. Discredit the messenger so people can deny the message and the environment in which it was delivered.

Deny Ignorance and think for yourselves.

The BNP Is almost a terrorist group,

And a Baby at the same time.

Their Values include: White Supremecy, Lazyness, Wife Beating, Drug dealing, Money Laundering.....I would go on, but it's best not to.

dont vote them into parliment, it's bad enough what we have at the moment.

Originally posted by monkeybus
Their Values include: White Supremecy, Lazyness, Wife Beating, Drug dealing, Money Laundering.....I would go on, but it's best not to.

Evidence please! It'll be gladly accepted if you can provide it. If not, we can write your post off as malicious slander. I mean, the BNP are far from perfect, but generalisations are exactly what an anti-racist like yourself (and myself) should be avoiding.

Originally posted by Freeborn
However, to compare the BNP with Muslim extremists and terrorists is downright disgraceful.
]

I said extremist radicals not terrorists.
The sweeping and ignorant way both groups stigmatise people they've never met to me seems quite similar.
Indulging in lazy prejudice and fostering (and promoting) feelings of bigotry,intolerance and prejudice could also be another comparative factor.