Obama Nominates 1st African-American Attorney General--Does This Anger People?, page 1/
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 06:22 PM by MOFreemason
reply to post by TeeJay



Thank you for sharing your insight. Much apprecited.



reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 08:01 PM by MOFreemason
reply to post by HIFIGUY



I hate creating a thread about race because there are some people can not handle speaking about race appropriately.

Having said this, we can't avoid the topic.


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 08:05 PM by PowerSlave
reply to post by Benarius



I am sure it is not so easy when the first thing you see from the MSM is headlines stating "first black _____" (fill in the blank)

America is not allowed to stop thinking in terms of black & white


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 08:42 PM by marg6043
reply to post by RRconservative



Exactly my point, while here in this thread the "racial issue" is been manipulated, big story here about Eric holder may have some skeletons in his closet linked to the controversial pardons under the Clinton Administration.

Beside he may be the "first black Attorney General" but he was the deputy Attorney General under Clinton so he is been already around the duties of the office after all.

Now back to the controversial pardons and Marc Rich.

You are right RRconservative this guy worries also.



reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 09:01 PM by PuRe EnErGy
You know I hear yah... don't care, not race related... but for a second I'd rather take another position.

I do care...

Do you want to know why?

My reason for caring goes something like this...

My problem is a fear... not fear of black people, .. not fear of white people... but fear of people in general, ... people that take situations like this to act, .. people who act upon racism or bigotry. People who act in extremes because otherwise they would cease to feel like they acted at all.

Why worry about black or white.. is it because it's not familiar?
It doesn't even really matter what the circumstances are, peoples main drive IS NOT Survival, it is familiarity .. people will kill themselves rather than face the unknown.

What I would like to purpose is that we actually judge things according to the fruit those things produce, or the effects that peoples actions have regardless of their supposed 'intended' outcomes.

In our recent history; an example of what I mean would go as follows...

Elected Bush -> Bush Messes Up -> Bush Messes Up -> Bush Messes Up -> Relected -> .....

instead bring on the ol' COMBO Breakers... and when someone continuously messes up we do something about it, and try something else.

I loathe politics, it just seems like the wrong people always get elected miraculously, as if there was some other control in place that we can't see... So I'm not really for or against anyone, that is until they start severely screwing things up.

I don't know much about Eric Holder therefore I cannot really comment on him, since I don't know him.
But I'll wait to see how he handles things *if* his nomination leads to the position and according to the situation I'll determine whether or not I should be mad about it....

[edit on 11/18/2008 by PuRe EnErGy]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^