If you have software to cut this long video from 4:00 to 11:00 so that make this video to be less 300M, I will share the download link of this video with you.

SUPER Video Converter. Go to the bottom of the page, hit Start Downloading SUPER Now. Next page, hit Download and Use. All the way to the bottom again, and hit Download SUPER Setpud File. Install. Will convert pretty well anything to anything. Just turn it into an AVI or WMV file with a smaller resolution, should chop off huge amounts of memory and make it easily loadable.

Recommended Parameters:
Scale: 640:480
Frames/Sec: 29.97
Output Container: AVI
Audio Bitrate: 64 kbps

Should make a tiny file. Will probably take a while, though, depending on your comp's speed.


[edit on 11/18/2008 by Darkpr0]

There are already plenty of Youtube links on it, including this one:

YouTube Link

[edit on 19-11-2008 by CreeWolf]

Already fixed, Nevermind..

[edit on 19-11-2008 by Chadwickus]

Uglified Flanker with a single vertical stabilizer and single engine? Planform seems kind of Miragey.
Anyone know any specs?

This was all posted before:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

and the OP even posted in that thread!

reply to post by Phage

---

Here are the specs:

Max Speed: crap
Max Altitude: crap
Battlefield Endurance: crap
Avionics: atari 2600 flight computer, Colecovision Radar

*ok, I should get serious now. Basically, this thing was obsolete the second it made its maiden flight.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by CreeWolf]

reply to post by CreeWolf

---

so your saying the Gripen, the Typhoon , the F-16 block whatever and the Rafale are all crap as well? since they are of a similar generation and ability.

No, I didn't mention any of them. I was just talking about the Chinese J-10. The others might have similar capability, but my personal opinion still rates the J-10 as "crap".

I actually like the Gripen. The Typhoon and F-16 are ok, but the Rafale is French crap. (IMO)

Hmm, the F16 was designed in the sixties and seventies. In its day there are those who considered it to be the best dogfighter of its time, but that was thirty years ago.

Very knowledgeable there...



A very strong argument could be made for the Rafale being the best of the 4.

reply to post by CreeWolf

---

so other than a misinformed `opinion` you offer no information whatsoever as to why you think the Rafale (with AESA now) or the J-10 (which china bought the plans for the LAVI , itself based upon the F-16) are in your words `crap`

edit:

let me point a few details of the J-10 for you:

the engine is an AL-31FN (the domestic WS-10A isn`t ready yet) which prduces 27,000 lb thrust the chinese built will produce 29,000 lb thrust

compare to the F-16 block 50 which has the GE F110-GE-129 which also produces 29,000 lb thrust, the gripen which has 18k thrust and the typhoon which has a pair of EJ200 engines , each making 13k thrust (total about 26k)

the rafale has a pair of 17000 thrust engines (snecma-M88)

so not short on power

weight

the J-10 weighs in at 18 tons

same as the gripen (again 18 tons) but slightly more than the F-16 at 12 tons , and 1/2 the weight of the porker called the Typhoon - a larger 34 tons there, with the rafale very much similar to the typhoon at around 34 tons.

payload?

well the J-10 can carry around 9 tons very similar to the F-16 , gripen is less at 8 tons - the number i can find for the `big boys` are similar again - pictures of the typhoon show it wuth 1 fuel tank and 8 1,000 lb paveway

fuel tanks weigh 1 kilogramme per litre (+ the tank iteself)

wing loading:

J-10 64 lb/ft
F-16 84 lb/ft
Gripen 68 lb/ft
Typhoon 63 lb/ft
Rafale 83 lb/ft


so not really a highly loaded wing either.


radar? appears at this time to be a version of the Zhuk as used on there own flankers - although it is reported to be fielding a chinese radar the 1471 which is better than the Zhuk with 15/4 (track and scane targets) and A2G capability.

electro optical tracking system - home bilt and better than anything russia can sell them - china wants a radar small enough so it can move the ImIR system to the nose.

only typhoon has an IRST - none of the rest have them (yet)

so tell me again , why is the J-10 `crap`?

i would really compare this aircraft to the F-16 block 50 , both having features the other doesn`t - but very much a capable workhorse.

[edit on 19/11/08 by Harlequin]

A bit spurious there Harlequin comparing the dry thrust of the EJ200 with the full burner figure for the M88, then calling the Typhoon a porker for being the same weight as the Rafale?

Rafale has approx 11,000lbs dry and 17, 000 with burner, Typhoon is 13,000 dry and 23,000 with burner, a significant advantage.

The AESA is a major boost for the Rafale, but the Typhoon has also already flown with an operational AESA set, we just need to hope we find the money to produce it.

I agree though that the J-10 cannot be dismissed as crap, it isn't.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by waynos]

[edit on 19-11-2008 by waynos]

ok, here is the download link, what I requested I have already done it by myself.
J-10 Demo. complete edition
hope you like it

[edit on 19-11-2008 by emile]

reply to post by waynos

---

ta for picking the thrust one up - why i put the dry thrust i`ll never know

www.hitechweb.genezis.eu...


^^ the boeing entry to the LWF competition which lead to the F-16

Boeings entry was quite similar to the F-16 in many ways, except for the swept wing.

reply to post by Harlequin

---

I know how to look up an aircraft's capabilities. I understand thrust to weight ratio, wing loading, etc..... I spent 6 years in the US Air Force and one of my jobs was Threat Assessment--Combat Aircraft.

All I was offering was my OPINION. To me, the J-10 might be the better performer in some aspects when compared to its contemporaries, but I still think its ugly. And, its Chinese.

By the way, as for the F-16; the only thing that makes any of these aircraft you mentioned able to fly in the first place is FLY-BY-WIRE. Which was the first production fighter aircraft to introduce it? The U.S.A.'s F-16 Fighting Falcon.

So, tell me, exactly WHAT is so innovative about this J-10? Did they utilize anything different that wasn't already in the Gripen, F-16, or Rafale?

[edit on 19-11-2008 by CreeWolf]