Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
He was incorrect about the time.
You have no ability to claim that.
Big deal!
The fact that he saw a plane at "9:12, 9:11" means he did not see any plane consistent with your "theory."
That is an easy and quite typical mistake that means nothing.
You can't claim it was a mistake.
But the fact is that in BOTH interviews he explains seeing what he thought was a "2nd plane" flying away immediately after the explosion in
the building.
His first account says
no such thing. You know that.
But he never saw 2 planes.
He never saw the plane approach because as he describes in detail, he was inside the Pentagon and just hung up the phone at that time of the
explosion.
I have already shown you exactly what he said. He was OUTSIDE when the explosion occurred and he only saw one plane outside the Pentagon at 9:11 or
9:12, completely unrelated to the attacks.
It would be impossible to see the plane approach from inside the building.
Roberts didn't claim to see
any plane approach in his first interview, now did he, Craig? You can't put words in his mouth to make your story
work. It's intellectually dishonest. Roberts clearly stated that the only plane he saw outside the Pentagon was the plane "flying around the south
parking lot" at "9:12, 9:11". It doesn't help you to keep misrepresenting Robert's statements which everyone can hear for themselves:
"Then my seargent, Seargent Woolwich, Woody, he called and he said, hey, rob, listen, we gonna threatcon delta. As I hang up the phone, the
plane hit the building. It all came at the same time, watching the tv, it was like, it was almost timed for preciseness. So, as I hung up the phone,
and I ran to the center of the dock and I looked up and I saw another plane flying around the south parking lot, it's about like 9:12, 9:11 in the
morning. And then there was dust and stuff coming from the ceiling, you could hear people screaming. So, what I did was, I turned around and drew out
my weapon, and I didn't know what was going on. I thoughts we was being invaded, I didn't know what was happening. So I ran back into South Loading
and I start forcing people out of the building."
memory.loc.gov.../afc911bib:@field(DOCID+@lit(afc911000155))
Your ridiculous 30 minute fantasy is a sad sorry cop-out and really exposes your desperation to spin the information at all costs to honesty
and truth.
It's simply not what Roosevelt ever described to anyone.
In fact, that's exactly what Robert's described and you can spin it like you do everything else to suit your desired conclusion.
The fact remains: Roosevelt Robert's saw NO flyover of any jet either at the time or in the way that your "theory" requires that he does; that he
describes two different accounts, one to LOC and one to you, that he claims in his interview that a jet flew toward the Pentagon from the southwest,
circled, and flew away back to the southwest,
which is completely in contradiction to YOUR OWN flyover claims.
You know for a FACT, Craig Ranke, that Roberts is no credible eyewitness to your theory and you can continue to spam here all you want but everyone
can see that your theory makes no sense and is not supported by any evidence whatsoever.
The only honest thing for you to do is admit it here and every other forum and to
shut down CIT.
[edit on 1-12-2008 by jthomas]
[edit on 1-12-2008 by jthomas]
[edit on 1-12-2008 by jthomas]
