Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by djeminy
I have never heard CIT making any particular claims about anything! As far as I know, all they do is presenting factual evidence!
Their "theory" requires a high-speed, low-altitude, flyover. That is the
consequence and implication of everything they have posted and in
all of their videos.
And do you know why you don't hear them saying a jet flew over and away from the Pentagon? You should. Why do you think they concentrate on their NoC
flight path, even though all of those 13 eyewitnesses either saw the jet hit the Pentagon, or believe it did, and NONE witnessed a jet flying over and
away the Pentagon?
Did it ever occur to you that CIT wants everybody to
infer that a flyover took place
without ever having to take the
responsibility to demonstrate a flyover with positive, verifiable evidence?
Why do you think that CIT evades providing that evidence?
How can you possibly call it a "theory"!!
They trust the witness statements, that the plane approached NOC. Full stop.
So do I.
And so should you. At least you should if you're a honest man; as there exist
absolutely no logical tangible valid reason to cast aspersions on these ordinary
average broad general all-round people, who are just like the rest of us, and certainly very much just like yourself, jthomas!
They are people who got absolutely no reason to lie, and got absolutely nothing to gain
from being dishonest in any way.
It seems to me, jthomas, that the only reason you're casting aspersions upon these
witnesses, witnesses you know nothing about personally, would be because you got
ulterior motives. There can be no other explanations. And that would again indicate that
you are not really a honest person to deal with - does it not!!
You keep repeating over and bloody over and over again, tediously, infinitely boringly,
that the witnesses saw or thought they saw the plane impact the building!
But for heavens sake! you, I, CIT, and a billion other people would probably have come
to the same conclusion, or same assumption, or same belief, same conjecture,
presumption, inference, supposition, postulation etc. etc. as the witnesses came to, if
we had been in the same locations all the witnesses were in.
And naturally so, especially if that was what the media told you over and over, again and again, had "indeed" happened!
It is logic for caged chooks we are talking about here, jthomas!
Wake up, dear fellow. You're walking on very thin ice, and you're getting heavier and
heavier by the hour! - in stark contrast to us who want to know the TRUTH, and in our
endeavour, of course, are feeling lighter and lighter by the day.
Join us, and you'll feel that heavy burden of slander, aspersions, spin, fibs, boredom ad
nauseum, hostility, acid sarcasm, etc. etc., you're carrying around, disappear like dew does for the sun!
The evil you're protecting have slaughtered hundred of thousands of people. Amongst
them countless women and children. They have splitted up families and made millions
homeless. They have with wild abandon caused immense destruction of that which
through many many years laborioushly has been built up. They have caused the death
of at least 4200 of their own citizens with many more young and injured, scarred for life.
And all this horrible misery for no GOOD reason. Repeat: for no GOOD reason.
All this horrendous misery and unimaginable suffering, caused by nothing else but lies
and fabrications!
Leave this evil alone, lest you become its servant!
PS!
Thanks MOD for fixing my 'quoting' problems!
How can I do it myself if a 'next time' comes up??
Yes, I'm less than an amateur with regards to this!
[edit on 21-11-2008 by djeminy]
