Why the F*** is there a PNAC banner on ATS?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 1-4-2004 @ 12:10 PM by Seekerof
Don't worry Bob...I'm clicking the hell out of that PNAC banner!
I like this part from the banner:
The Project for the New American Century intends, through issue briefs, research papers, advocacy journalism, conferences, and seminars, to explain what American world leadership entails. It will also strive to rally support for a vigorous and principled policy of American international involvement and to stimulate useful public debate on foreign and defense policy and America's role in the world.


"Educated guesses" only go so far and in the end, end up proving nothing, other than to show that the corrupt prior administration was the real cause of 9/11.
Even Mr. Clarke has admitted as much, though no word of this in his 9/11 Committee hearing though....
Richard Clarke Flashback: Clinton Dropped Ball on bin Laden
And in a "60 Minutes" interview set to air Sunday night, Clarke blasts Bush for doing "a terrible job on the war against terrorism."

But just a year ago Clarke was singing a different tune, telling reporter Richard Miniter, author of the book "Losing bin Laden," that it was the Clinton administration - not team Bush - that had dropped the ball on bin Laden.


Spin that one while your seeking to spin the PNAC 'conspiracy' there BT.
More of this man's "spinning, and flip flopping" comments can be found and placed upon request, and that BT, takes no "educated guess".



seekerof

[Edited on 1-4-2004 by Seekerof]


reply posted on 1-4-2004 @ 01:01 PM by Bout Time
Originally posted by Seekerof
More of this man's "spinning, and flip flopping" comments can be found and placed upon request, and that BT, takes no "educated guess".


Seek - you're famous for being a linking 'demon', so I hold no doubt that you can post scads of gerbil droppings supposedly in support of your positions, we're knee deep in 'em!

So much so, let me return the favor & offer up the perfect avatar for your Bush Apologist profile:



That's you to a tee, especially lately with the complete buy in of the White House smear on yet another Republican come to their senses!!

Larry Lindsay, Scott Ritter, Paul O'Neil, Dick Clarke, John DiIulio,Generals Eric Sinseki -Tony Zinni-Norman Shwartzkopf, Ambassador Joe Wilson, Richard Foster......all voted for Bush in 2000, all worked on his administrations payroll.......YET, they are all bunch of flip floppers & lying LIIIIBEEERUULL'S, HUH?

I can't wait for Long Grain Rice to testify , lie through her horse teeth, and have you spin it like it's gospel!
I mean, you have what? 50 TV appearences by her in the last week saying how Dick Clarke is the DEBIL!?

I guess it makes sense to you for Bush AND Cheney to testify at the same time too, huh?
No problems there?
We have our differences, but you do keep me coming back for more!


reply posted on 2-4-2004 @ 06:08 PM by Seekerof
BT.....slap-shot this one will ya!?
Reads like PNAC and all courtesy of your beloved prior administration:
A NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY FOR A NEW CENTURY:The White House December 1999

Surprising thing in mentioning all those names you did BT, is that each and everyone of them believed and voiced that:
>Saddam and Al-Qaeda were indeed linked.
> they endorsed and agreed with the war against the Taliban and Iraq.
>all of them are being slammed and debunked by who else: Slate
> specifically your "DEBIL" is a mega liar...yep, thats right, in more ways than you admit and side-step. Another?....Oh my...while under oath before the 9/11 commission:
Under questioning by Republican members of the commission, Clarke, who said he voted Republican in 2000, rebutted charges by the White House that he was engaged in a partisan political attack.


9/11 Panel Told Terrorism Initially Not 'Urgent' for Bush


And here is what he said on "Meet The Press":
MR. RUSSERT: And we're back. Did you vote for George Bush in 2000?

MR. CLARKE: No, I did not.

MR. RUSSERT: You voted for Al Gore.

MR. CLARKE: Yes, I did.

Transcript for March 28--Guest: Fmr. White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke

Yep BT...sad that your "DEBIL" is either mentally confused or a significant liberal lair and smells of conflict of interests and credibility issues!!

The sad part about liberals is that asking for consistency from 'a' liberal is like asking for love from the likes of the devil....what ya think?



seekerof

[Edited on 2-4-2004 by Seekerof]

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Internet as a case study of Socialism
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
The Greenbay Packer\'s Prove That Socialism Works.
  Posted 18 days ago with 5 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags