It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GamerGal
reply to post by RRconservative
And how did the UAW kill the auto companies? I'm pretty sure it was the 4-6 dollar gas. Or will you use the usual "Unions make it so the companies can't use slave labor!" BS? It was the gas crunch. Before people could afford a truck and fill up the thirty gallon tank. Not at 5 dollars a gallon though. And who offered gas sippers? Japan and Korea. My KIA is Korean and I've gotten over 40mpg!
Originally posted by jibeho
Omni/Horizon, Chevette/t1000, ... Tempo/Topaz,
Originally posted by RRconservative
10 Cars and 1 Union that sank Detroit..........
The Auto Workers Union
Do Not Bailout the Auto Industry.
Contact your Reps!
Originally posted by vox2442
Originally posted by jibeho
Omni/Horizon, Chevette/t1000, ... Tempo/Topaz,
I have owned one of these (Chevette) and have a lot of experience with the other two. They were cheap to buy, cheap to drive, cheap to maintain, and could be a lot of fun if you avoided the automatic transmissions. They were a good second car for a family, a reliable winter beater, and for about 65% of the people my age in the late 80's, one of those cars was the first car they ever owned. The chev cav and ford escort would round that out to about 95%.
IMO getting rid of these models is where Detroit lost the plot. You need to have a cheap base model, without the bells and whistles, that anyone can drive away with -and own outright - regardless of their budget. Detroit got away from these models and got into the leasing scam, which wound up costing them huge in the long run.
The carmaker sold its Jaguar and Land Rover luxury units to India's Tata Motors Ltd. for about $2.4 billion in June
Jaguar X-Type. Ford bought the British luxury brand Jaguar in 1990, when all three Detroit automakers were seeking ways to expand their global reach. Eventually, Ford decided to build an entry-level Jaguar starting at around $30,000 for people looking to move up from, say, a Mercury Marquis. The down-market move "represented everything that Jaguar is not," says Libby of J.D. Power. The X-Type was built on an ordinary sedan platform from elsewhere in Ford's lineup, and the front-wheel-drive system underwhelmed enthusiasts used to rear-drive European makes. Jag purists were horrified, and aspiring luxury buyers shunned the X-Type in favor of BMWs, Lexuses, and Acuras. After fumbling the luxury brand for nearly two decades, Ford sold Jaguar to an Indian conglomerate in 2008.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
reply to post by GamerGal
don't forget that american cars are notoriously unreliable!
why bailout a company that makes unreliable gas guzzlers?
they should have been focusing on reliable, hybrid type cars instead of
huge trucks, suv's and crappy cars that would do you no good unless you are a mechanic!
The debate over aid to the Detroit-based automakers is awash with half-truths and misrepresentations that are endlessly repeated by everyone from members of Congress to journalists. Here are six myths about the companies and their vehicles, and the reality in each case
Originally posted by uplander
I wholeheartedly agree with you here! My very first car in 1989 was a 1979 Mercury Zephyr. LOL WOW What memories that brings me! I loved that little brown box, even with the crumpled up front quarter panel! It took me everywhere and ran like a horse.