reply to post by Demandred
i never ruled out the orthodox approach, which focuses on temperatures, i simply added another variable into the mix, which is experimentally proven
to have that effect.
if anything, sunblocker is as manmade as it gets, so i'd love to see it changed (or gone if necessary) like yesterday, its effect on Vitamin D
synthesis is bad enough anyway. only a ban can lead to conclusive results, obviously.
PS: that's exactly the problem i see with all AGW threads, if it ain't CO2 it does not exist, could be proven dimethyl mercury (extremely toxic
compound, btw) pollution, it would still only be about CO2 here and warming there, while any other proposed or identified mechanism is either ignored
or denied.
|
