Real Contrail Science, why they persist and why they spread out and why they are not chemtrails , page 12
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 61 times


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:40 AM by s0ndernet
www.rense.com...
Those are not chemtrails. I repeat they are not chemtrails. Chemtrails are an internet rumor, only. What you photographed are just condensation trails from jets flying at the same altitude all at once, some at 90 degree angles, and also other jets flying at the same time in the same or completely opposite direction within a few thousand feet of each other. Air traffic control lets that happen all the time. There are a lot of jets up there and although condensation does seem to last longer than it did in the past you should not worry.

The fact that you went outside and took the time to observe and take photographs is alarming to me. You are not watching enough TV. I might have to report you. If you spend too much time outside with a camera you could be a terrorist. Stay inside. Watch Fox news for information, and sports and reality shows for entertainment. Stay entertained. Don't question, and above all don't think.

In the near future some Obama Youth Corps helpers will be there to assist you from causing this kind of trouble again, so relax.

Dick
Honolulu
------------------------------------------------
Again, [inset sarcasm] ignore the obvious, watch more tv, hate your neighbor, assault your enemy and deny facts.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:57 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by s0ndernet



Thank you so much.

You have allayed my fears. I will no longer investigate the chemtrail phenomenon.

Thank you, and God bless your soul


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 05:01 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by Velvet Death



The fibres are produced by modified bacteria living symbiotically within the modified nematode.

The fibres act very much in the same way tree roots do when they destroy infrastructure - the ordinance is deployed over areas containing primarily concrete infrastructure - which the nematodes have also been modified to consume at an increased rate. The fibres also serve to accelerate and facilitate erosion. They make an effective force multiplier, as stated in my post a few pages back.

I hope I have been of assistance.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by TruthTellist]


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 07:56 AM by dave420
reply to post by defcon5



Also, in some parts of the country the ATC routes planes through corridors which are not straight, hence some aircraft might make slight course alterations at various points along its route. That is because the ATC system is rather old, and doesn't use GPS to route the planes. It's for safety, and it is rather inefficient. There's talk of switching to the new GPS-based system, though that will take years and cost billions.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 07:56 AM by dave420
reply to post by s0ndernet



How do you know the barium came from the planes? That's a guess, right? Unless you collected them directly from the plane, they could have come from anywhere.



reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 08:03 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by dave420



He already provided you with the answers to the questions you just unnecessarily asked.

I suggest you reread his post.

Your feigned ignorance is too obvious, and your links still aren't working.

Edit

[edit on 19-11-2008 by TruthTellist]


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 08:06 AM by dave420
reply to post by TruthTellist



No, he made wild-ass guesses. That's something different.

And the link is still working - may I suggest you check your internet connection? The link is working perfectly. If you can't even download a PDF what makes you think you can call into doubt the accumulated knowledge of all the world's meteorologists, pilots, aircraft manufacturers, chemists and physicists? Are you really that arrogant?


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 08:19 AM by Zepherian
reply to post by dave420



Give it a rest Dave, Truthtellist has linked orders of magnitude more external stuff than you have, at least respect him for it. For the most part you just throw negativity around based on, well, not much. If anything you are hurting your side's position of the chemtrail debate, as it is obvious such groundless insistance is based on mania or agenda.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 08:36 AM by dave420
reply to post by Zepherian



It's all about quality not quantity. He's posted links about all kinds of stuff not related to "chemtrails". He can't even demonstrate anything he's saying. All he has is weak anecdotal evidence. I'm showing there are obvious, mundane explanations for all these misidentifications of contrails. It's ridiculous.

Couple that with the arrogance of the believers who think just because they saw something they don't understand, that no-one does, including the experts who study these phenomena day-in and day-out.

It's ridiculous. There is no debate. On one side there are a group of folks who know about the phenomena being described, and how the scientific method works, and on the other side there are a bunch of folks with what can only be described as paranoia, explaining things they simply don't understand to some shadowy cabal.

This is like the creationism vs evolution debate. One side argues with logic, the other has none. The believers are in the latter camp.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 08:37 AM by Essan
Originally posted by s0ndernet
Chemtrails exist, i used to collect the barium rocks by the handfuls in southern california. and i sampled the polymers as they collected on plantlife after misty pollution rains.


What's a 'misty pollution rain'? Drizzle?

Since rain falls from low level clouds tens of thousands of feet below the level at which alleged chemtrails appear, how you connect those 'chemtrails' with the barium found after rainfall? Maybe the barium comes form low level pollution sources?

If barium were falling out of so-called chemtrails it should land a few thousand miles downwind of the trail, several days later, and probably not during rainfall.


Its often used on the west coast for over the horizon communications


Here in the UK we use satellites

But presumably you, and those believing chemtrails cause Morgellons, disagree with TruthTellist who was earlier claiming chemtrails are some sort of NATO defence network thingie?

As I've said before, it's one of the fundamental problems: every believer believes something different. And none of you can explain why chemtrails should be visible, let alone look and behave identical to contrails.

Unless, as I keep suggesting, what you're seeing is not chemtrails?

Which obviously does not mean chemtrail spraying is not happening - just that you've been deliberately misdirected. But maybe that's too much like a conspiracy? And this is ...... oh, wait a minute, this is a conspiracy website

(For the record I do not believe any significant spraying does take place, but I can neither prove it does not nor would I be so arrogant to deny that it can not. I just know what people see and claim to be chemtrails are not chemtrails)

[edit on 19-11-2008 by Essan]


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 08:40 AM by populardisbelief
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by populardisbelief
Also two different planes sharing same direction and slightly same altitude:

Plane No1) No long contrail
Plane No2) Long contrail

Here (on page 37) is a photo of two different aircraft flying side by side, one generating a contrail and the other not, simply due to newer engine design. In the 1990’s the airlines started retiring the workhorse 727 aircraft, which used older engines, for the newer 737, 757, 767, and airbus families.

Originally posted by populardisbelief
Well...I am posting in a thread that appeared all of a sudden out of nowhere claiming chemtrails do not exist and we do know, at least I do that this is the time they resume spraying for the winter after they seem to stop in spring, at least in Europe!

The reason why you see more contrail in the winter should be obvious.
Temperatures go down, and contrails form easier.

[edit on 11/18/2008 by defcon5]


You do realize what is shown that page 37 is:

1 plane with an older engine (I can accept that) leaving no contrails, the widely seen and familiar short contrails AND
1 plane with newer engine technology that leaves the widely seen and familiar (again) SHORT contrails (you should accept that) in an altitude different that we used to.

Where are the planes that leave the weird behaving and sometimes colored contrails that last for miles? The ones that change to strange patterns when the wind blows through them, the ones that can stay observable for hours, the ones that can literally form clouds from their substance, the ones that you see in the US, I see over Europe and some other guy sees over N. Delhi for instance.

BOTH planes leave SHORT contrails.
We are looking for the LONG ones, which an urban myth termed as chemtrails.
Say, I do not believe there are chemicals being sprayed from airplanes, but PLEASE show me in what conditions do we have LONG contrails that behave like I described above.

YOU CANT!


[edit on 19-11-2008 by populardisbelief]

[edit on 19-11-2008 by populardisbelief]

[edit on 19-11-2008 by populardisbelief]


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 08:43 AM by doomsauce
reply to post by dave420



Thank you dave, the link worked for me and was very informative, except for the math, which I have no grasp of. (2+3=skeletor? NO WAY!)
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>    ^^TOP^^



Starship Enterprise could be a reality by 2032, engineer says
  Posted 13 days ago with 77 member flags
WARNING: 3D TV\'s Possibly Causing Strokes and Vision Loss
  Posted 19 days ago with 27 member flags
I want to build a free energy generator! Suggestions?
  Posted 16 days ago with 20 member flags
World’s longest-running experiment now with webcam
  Posted 14 days ago with 19 member flags
Schoolboy \'genius\' solves puzzles posed by Sir Isaac Newton
  Posted 1 days ago with 17 member flags
Bye Bye Co2 and global warming
  Posted 6 days ago with 16 member flags
TV Networks Say You\'re Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials
  Posted 0 days ago with 16 member flags
Big Oil Vs. Plasma Battery Technology - Guess who is winning?
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags