In the coming months, I believe the only *new* rich people will be those that buy life insurance on the NWO members. It's probably a better investment than the garbage "investment vehicles" their lousy banks offer.

Presumably a forgery.

it's a bit too perfect, doncha think? 'the lower class of people...' etc... come off it.

Probably faked by the same anti-semite elements which concocted the 'Protocols for the Elders of Zion'. May well date from a similar time

I seriously doubt this thing is genuine... cool find though, if the back story about Lindy is true

Ya know... sometimes the best way to conceal the truth- even if it wasn't a manifesto from 1892- would be to encase it in lies and scams......

My question is how do you beat a foe that has been winning for over a 100 years?

I fear that we will never be able to beat the planning and organizational abilities of those in control.

They are very good at what they do.

The system has been made so those within it can not recognize the cells they are in.

Actually, for the sake of the possible legitimacy of the manifesto, if you read the response by another poster quoting off a bankers magazine from 1924. It's almost exactly the same as the manifesto, that you said the website made in 2003?

If it is fake then it is strongly influenced by that article for sure. Or if it's real... well you get the idea.

[edit on 17-11-2008 by Boogley]

If this did come from 1892 time then it sure is odd - the main political debate at the time was between the populists who were causing quite a storm in the midwest with there economic policy,

"Populists and other free-silver proponents advocated unlimited coinage of the white metal [silver] in order to inflate the money supply, thus making it easier for cash-strapped farmers and small businessmen to borrow money and pay off debts."

At the Democratic National Convention in 1896, the assembled delegates nominated William Jennings Bryan, an avid supporter of free silver, for president but was defeated by the "sound money" Republican William McKinley. The free-silver movement went into rapid decline. McKinley's reelection and the statutory adoption of the gold standard in 1900 spelled political oblivion for the Populists.


So this would have been about the sort of time the bankers were cooking up a plan to deal with the 'little people' because they realized that sooner or later a populist movement would usurp them - HOWEVER if someone was going to fake a document such as this then there were quite a few people around who might just fit the bill.....

"Populist leaders such as William Peffer and "Sockless" Jerry Simpson were often portrayed as deluded simpletons who failed to understand the true causes of their economic plight. The Populists' "stupidity" was also attested to by their apocalyptic rhetoric, conspiracy theories, and radical agenda, which included nationalization of the railroads, a graduated income tax, and the unlimited coinage of silver. Critics scoffed at their overblown rants, mocked their paranoid style, and dismissed their simplistic nostrums as the distempered ravings of "socialist hayseeds.""
-Quentin P. Taylor, assistant professor of history and political science at Rogers State University, Claremore, Oklahoma

So, it could have been exactly the right time for the NWO bankers to have created this document OR exactly the right time for the TROOFERS to have created it. Personally though i think it stinks of modern forgery.

Hate to tell you, but this is completely phoney!

It isn't real, it is made up.

Fantasy or delerium, take your choice.

Sorry folks, but the author of this crap obviously needs some more medications to control his hallucinations.

Originally posted by Jezus
My question is how do you beat a foe that has been winning for over a 100 years?

By waking up. It's easy to beat a competitor who doesn't know he's competing. When we realise that there's a silent battle raging, we might stand a chance.

Originally posted by Boogley
Actually, for the sake of the possible legitimacy of the manifesto, if you read the response by another poster quoting off a bankers magazine from 1924. It's almost exactly the same as the manifesto, that you said the website made in 2003?

I thought so too. Actually, if you google the bankers manifesto there are quite a few websites giving it credence, and only a couple of them cite NESARA as their source. I still can't be certain about its legitimacy, so I'm hoping we can use this thread to get to the bottom of it. In practical terms though, how many of us would be surprised if it were real? I know I wouldn't. What's admitted in the manifesto is precisely what I had previously believed the banks to be engaged in.

Originally posted by Cythraul
By waking up. It's easy to beat a competitor who doesn't know he's competing. When we realise that there's a silent battle raging, we might stand a chance.

True, but many people won't accept the information you present to them.

Look how many people immediately assume it must be fake...

without any kind of research, analysis, or critical thinking.

Thanks to the poster who researched the history of the website. It probably IS a scam. I like to think it's just their company having gone bust and now the guy who pays for the website posts his deranged manifesto drunkenly one night.

All of it is absolutely true, of course. There's no doubting that. But, as other posters have said, the way its written is distinctively modern. Sort of like that "This is what I have done. I am Caeser." e-mail quote that got circulated around in 2003-2004.

I sure don't know if it is authentic or not, but back in the early 90's, a friend gave me a pamphlet that had this Manifesto (or something very similar) in it. I can't begin to remember the name of the pamphlet, but it had all sorts of interesting things in it. We talked about whether it was authentic and came to the conclusion that we would probably never know for sure, but we both thought that whether or not it's authentic, it sure seemed to be the way things were. 18 years later, I still have no idea if it is authentic or not, but sure seems to be the way things are.

I had just "woke up" shortly before I saw this and was spending almost every weekend at the law library. I searched everywhere I could think of to see if I could find anything hidden away in the law library that could verify this, but never found anything.

A lot of things I discovered in the law library (obviously true and authentic) and various books/pamphlets and other stuff (authenticity questionable) I got back then are appearing on the Net these days. I don't think I will ever know what's authentic (outside what I found in the law library) or not, but can look around and see that many things I read then have come to pass.

I don't know if it's authentic, but it has been around for a while.



[edit on 17-11-2008 by inthesticks]