Originally posted by Mercenary2007
First a certification of live birth is not a birth certificate.
A certification of live birth is a short form used in place of a birth certificate.
... Limited information is taken from the original birth record (the long form) and stored in a database that can be accessed quickly when
birth certificates are needed in a short amount of time. ... The short form typically includes the child's name, date of birth, sex, and place of
birth...
So... If the "short form" is information taken directly from the "long form" and it includes the
place of birth, that's ALL we need to
know. Right?
He was born IN HAWAII and is therefore eligible for his new job. I know... that's not good enough for some.
Great points, Southern. I'm afraid much of your research falls on some deaf ears, but it's important, nonetheless.
Some lawyers become VERY
popular by being involved in high-profile cases and I think both Berg and Keyes are hoping a lawsuit against the most popular president in many
years is their ticket to fame. (Had anyone heard of Phil before this?)
Even losers become popular and get a hike in business. These guys are both multiple losers in their fields and are grasping at what they see as the
brass ring...
The problem with these suits is they state several vague charges. They include "Obama
might have been born in Kenya" or "he
could be
a citizen of Indonesia" or maybe "he's
possibly not really a natural-born citizen of the US", but they don't settle on one charge because
they're not sure of
any of them, so they cover all the bases in hopes of a deeper investigation to turn up something!

Please! SOMETHING!
They're desperate to find
SOMETHING to keep this man out of the White House, so they bring lawsuits with multiple
possiblecharges and
hope that something will stick or "turn up".
If they had any real evidence, they'd go for ONE charge and present solid evidence. Everything they have is circumstantial, at best.