reply to post by southern_Guardian
Gee I didn't know you were a school teacher giving grades
One - You fail on simple spelling/ third grade writing comprehension. "his an ambassador" ?
"First of all the ambassador has no authority as to whether to say Obama was born there or not, his an ambassador for petes sakes"
But guess what? He did say it and if it were not true why would he say it? Political recognition on a lie?
Two - "The ambassador does not have access to Obamas long form of his birth certificate and has not seen or even mentions his short form
certificate" Good Spin, But isn't that what most people here are looking for, Obama to produce a valt copy.
Three - "in tradition they considered honory (HONOREE) kenyans, especially in the case of being famous" According to what I listened to in the
interview they are going to erect a monument in the place of Obama’s birth in Kenya and they also created a new
holiday in Obama's honor.
Fourth - "This guy probably got paid plenty of cash to say this and yet he has not been able to verify it, neither can the radio station."
Are you saying that the Ambassador of Kenya Peter Ogego a Government Official would accept bribe money to say what a small time radio station wanted
him to say? Gee who would of thought a Government Official could be bribed.
Or could it be that if someone says anything you don't want to hear their being paid off?
Fifth - "And heres another clue, one of the radio hosts mention "america RIP" "
You might want to get a clue yourself because nowhere before, during or after the interview does anyone mention America RIP. although the first
commenter did leave that in type in the comment area, maybe what you read you just thought you heard?
So on that note you Failed Miserably
You fail on simple spelling, punctuation and capitalization/ third grade writing comprehension.
You fail on simple listening/ short term memory comprehension.
You also fail on understanding what people are asking for.
You see this is a constitutional issue it is not bias in any shape or form, this issue could have been put to rest
very early by producing his valt copy as McCain did, but instead he just thumbed his nose at everyone and
ignored them just like the Bush administration has been doing for years, this led to lawsuits being brought to
the courts with even more questions and at the tax payers expense I might add, who do you think is footing
the bill for the Judge, the use of the court room, the stenographer..etc...etc this all is being done at the tax payers
expense and I know I'm not to happy about that are you?
This may be a bit off topic but I think it is important and factual to the issues at hand and I believe it should be investigated to bring forth
beyond all reasonable doubt that Hawaii is indeed legally a State of the United States because in 1993, a joined Congressional resolution, signed by
President Bill Clinton, apologized for the U.S. role in the overthrow. The House approved the resolution by voice vote. And the Senate passed it 65 to
The overthrow of a Sovereign Nation in 1893 for Political and Corporate gain, The Americans voted for Hawaii's Statehood, not the Hawaiians. There
are still debates going on about this in Hawaii as well as some civil unrestwas this legal? have a read and judge for yourself.
The Annexation of Hawaii
Hawaii is not legally a state!