AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Aliens and UFOs discussion forum.  (rss)


Must See! Video:38 levels above Top Secret!


<<  1    2    3    4  >>



reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 03:42 PM by DCPatriot


Originally posted by NavalFC
This is BS. There is no "level" above top secret, but then you get into top secret/ compartmentalized information. here in a project each portion is compartmentalzied and no one in any compartment knows anything about the others......


Also, the audio of the gentleman who suggest information was intentionally withheld from President Jimmy Carter is SOOOO out of synch as to be ridiculous.

This is BS, IMHO.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 03:48 PM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 03:51 PM by karl 12


Originally posted by Bspiracy
I don't know about this "38" levels thing but COSMIC clearance is a NATO clearance level and represents the highest and most sensitive. There are 5 other levels from that point before it goes back to the individual country.



B ~Good post heres C.S.M. Bob Dean discussing NATO's interest in the UFO/OVNI subject and a report known as the Assessment:

YouTube Link

Bob Dean comments on information he was privy to during his tenure at NATO.The ET-UFO information was classified under "Cosmic Top Secret". Dean said a summary report was written that said (1) the UFOs did not present any hostile threat; (2) "they" have apparently been monitoring the Earth for many hundreds of years; and (3) "the technology was so far advanced of anything we could conceive- at least 1,000 years off- that it appeared as 'magic' "


[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 04:02 PM by rocksarerocks


reply to post by RFBurns



Really? What if there is nothing to disclose? I mean seriously, how many people do you actually think are willing to lie for the government or any organization?



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 04:06 PM by Pocky


reply to post by rocksarerocks



Only 25 people in the world know the very top classified information at level COSMIC... so who are these 25 people? I'm thinking they have to be aliens, hybrids or something like that. Perhaps they are people that we have never seen. Hmmm I'm curious to know who this elite group is, and how only 25 people can retain the very secret info about this sector of the universe.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 04:15 PM by T0by


Originally posted by Retikx

...so you believe that the us govt is covering up UFO's? You believe that they are capable of covering up the existence of intelligent alien life in space.. But they wouldn't cover up the real reasons behind 9/11?

Your a joke.


lol true. They did a pretty poor job of covering that up. Surprising if they could cover up ufos 100 times better.

[edit on 17-11-2008 by T0by]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 04:48 PM by Schaden


Originally posted by DCPatriot

Also, the audio of the gentleman who suggest information was intentionally withheld from President Jimmy Carter is SOOOO out of synch as to be ridiculous.

This is BS, IMHO.


I don't know anything about this former Chief Master Sergeant Salter, honestly the so called alien contact intelligence organization (ACIO) sounds ridiculous, but the attorney Daniel Sheehan's credentials are impeccable. Google his biography and background.

He's the primary source for the story that President Carter was denied access to UFO information by the CIA director. The narration in this video was terrible. For some reason they didn't trust Carter ? He made it a campaign pledge to disclose the government's UFO knowledge ! Of course they weren't briefing him !

I encourage you to watch Sheehan's full disclosure testimony. The video in this thread only presents a small snippet. There is more to the story. Bush told Carter he didn't have blanket authority for access to all the UFO files, but he did tell him how to go about asking for it through the Congressional Research Office. And that's how Sheehan and Marcia Smith became involved.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 05:14 PM by Anonymous ATS


reply to post by Schaden



People should think some more before completely dismissing the notion that someone from the CIA would tell President Carter he's not privy to information. Yes its highly unlikely, but keep in mind that the CIA had by that time become its own powerful entity that Carter was very much aware of. When you cross the CIA and their agenda, you risk assasination ( JFK / RFK ). So even if I were the pope I'd likely back off if I wanted to enjoy life.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 06:49 PM by UmbraSumus


Originally posted by DangerDeath
Facing secret knowledge is like facing vacuum. It draws you out of your skin.

You try to fill this vacuum with your imagination, and that's all you get - fantasy...

The real consequence is that you are rendered passive, or reactive - you react to ignorance, you are powered by ignorance.

Let's try to be creative.

What is the effect of those who keep secrets (sometimes in our names)?
Animosity. Division. Opposition.




Though i do not agree with your conclusion entirely , i commend the way you laid out your perspective of the inherent pitfalls in a "quest for truth".
Whilst in the midst of questioning other peoples motives , we have to stop and question our own from time to time.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 06:55 PM by Bnmssnit


reply to post by Anonymous ATS


I dont believe Pres Carter was allowed to know the truth about ufos.He stated during his campaign that he had seen a ufo at one time and if he were ever President he would tell the American people the truth.Well he blew the lid off about Israels nucleasr arsenal not long ago and if he indeed knew about ufos he would have told the public...thus he was kept in the dark.If he would have fired Cia director Bush we know what happens to Presidents that do that....re Kennedy!



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 09:29 PM by Lasheic


Originally posted by Pocky
reply to post by SpaceSilence



Yea, it's quite intriguing. What is most interesting is the quote from George Bush to that reporter... something of the sort... " If they knew what we have done, they would lynch us" ... in response to the idea of disclosing all the major secrets.


Or maybe his comment has more to do with dumb **** like this that our government and it's agencies have been pulling for years. Perhaps nothing to do with anything truly phenomenal - but certainly morally reprehensible to the highest degree.


YouTube Link


He was seriously going to mount Bin Laden's head on the wall over the fireplace and use al-Zarqawi's pelt as a skin rug. Regardless of whatever half-jokingly suggestions people have similarly proposed - to think that the leader of our nation would actually do something so sadistic and more befitting Vlad Dracul than President of the United States would undoubtedly inspire rage and indeed likely get him lynched.

The record of assassination attempt on Fidel Castro certainly provides another illuminating and rather entertaining in it's bafoonery insight into the crap our government pulls. I can only imagine some of the horrific things our government has attempted which we will likely never hear about - because they WERE successful. I simply believe this extends more to political maneuvering and wartime atrocities (Abu Ghraib, for instance) than it has to do with mass killings of the public or hiding UFO information.

[edit on 17-11-2008 by Lasheic]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 10:36 PM by Schaden


It came out recently, that back in the 1950s or 1960s, the govt released highly radioactive gas into the air in Washington state and Oregon to test how wind currents impact fallout. It was called Green River or something. There are undoubtedly people who got cancer from such experiments.

There were other experiments where they injected unwitting healthy human beings with plutonium and other highly toxic substances. Sounds like something straight out of a Nazi death camp, but it was the American government.

I don't think Bush's quote was directly referring to a UFO cover up. He's far too smart to say that in public. My guess is he's talking about usual government malfeasance, selling us out to the NWO etc...




[edit on 17-11-2008 by Schaden]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 12:57 AM by Dbriefed


Think of Compartmented as the way they keep submarines from sinking from a leak. If one compartment is compromised, the rest is intact. If you are read on to a compartment, the government goes to lengths to make sure you're not read on to a second compartment of the same project.

Top Secret has a few levels.

TS/SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information)
TS/SI-TK (Sensitive Information Tango Kilo (Satellite Imagery))
TS/SI (Sensitive Information)
TS (Run of the mill Top Secret clearance)

The levels require different types of investigation.

TS/EBI (Extended Background Investigation - 20 year pre-birth)
TS/SBI (Special Background Investigation)
TS/BI (Background Investigation)

A couple of add-on qualifiers:
COSMIC simply means NATO information.
NOFORN means No Foreign disclosure
EYES ONLY means only one person can read the material

Most agencies recognize a common classification dictionary. There are some temp agencies with no names that are outside the normal classification scope.

[edit on 18-11-2008 by Dbriefed]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 01:27 AM by zorgon


Originally posted by Kenan
I got a crater on Mars to sell you.



How much?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 03:36 AM by wonkamaniac


Well... In my opinion the following things are true, and I stress, this is Opinion:
The OP has posted old hat info, although this is good for those new to the field.
Salter seems genuine, but perhaps is mistaken in his idea of compartmentalized intelligence.
The thing that really bothers me (and Friedman) about Salter is he switches back and forth
between "Cosmic" and "Cosmos". If you're gonna be a whistleblower, get it straight, and stick to your story.
Perhaps that was what he was led to believe by those "in the know".
The Australian video was extremely cheesy, but hey, there are plenty of examples of that in this field.
I personally have seen 2 UFO's in my lifetime. Were they extra-terrestrial? I can't say.
All I can say is they were strange lights that made impossible (by our known physics) maneouvers.
Could it have been military? Sure... no doubt.
Could it have been extra-terrestrial craft? Absolutely. Who knows?
Whatever I saw fits the definition of "Unidentified Flying Objects". Point of origin: Unknown.
I personally believe that life is the rule, not the exception in the Multiverse.
But, this is just a personal belief, a faith, if you will...
I try very hard to be a believing sceptic. In other words, I believe SOME sightings are genuine...
Most are hoaxed, or misunderstood, perhaps even the things I saw were natural phenomena. Who knows?
I do believe that we have been and are being visited by extra-terrestrial life forms.
However, I also believe that a very SMALL percentage of sightings can be attributed to this explanation.
IMHO, the Disclosure Project was brilliant.
Over 400 witnesses willing to testify before Congress that what they experienced cannot be easily explained.
Where did this get us? Nowhere.
It's a hot-potato for politicians, as the military doesn't really want the truth out (whatever that may be).
Congressianal inquiries always end up with the same conclusion: Unknown.
The Disclosure Project did one good thing: It raised questions, and questions are good.
There has been an intimidation campaign by top levels of government trying to squash information.
That alone raises many questions, but are they extra-terrestrial, or military black ops?
I am of the opinion that if these things were ET and hostile, we would no longer exist.
That gives me hope.
If they are military, of course they are going to disinfo things to an ET level, to avoid scrutiny.
The truth is: we have no clue what these things are, and it is going to remain that way until
the military is ready to let us know (think Stealth Fighter and Bomber).
I wish us all luck, and am ready to know the truth...
Until then, it is all merely speculation.
If you want to get to the truth: "Follow the Money"



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 05:04 AM by karl 12


Theres some good,well researched information in this film about security clearances/data compartmentalisation in the U.S. government and how it is quite realisticaly credible for a relatively small number of people within it's power structure to maintain secrecy.
It also shows how corporate entity owned media companies disseminate propaganda with full government approval:

video.google.com...

Google Video Link


Synopsis of film:
NEWS MEDIA COMPLICITY AND THE TRUTH EMBARGO, with Terry Hansen. A mesmerizing account of his investigation into whether some of America's most influential news organizations, many having maintained close ties to the U.S. intelligence community, have willingly suppressed full and accurate news coverage of extraterrestrial related phenomena for a variety of "national-security" reasons. Hansen reveals the remarkable and persistent difference in UFO-related news coverage exhibited by local and national news organizations and reviews the history of censorship and propaganda during the twentieth century and the evidence for media-government collusion over the course of the half-century-long UFO controversy.
Hansen holds a bachelor’s degree in biology and a master’s degree in science journalism, both from the University of Minnesota. He was a founding partner of KFH Publications, Inc., a Seattle computer-magazine publishing company. This presentation covers some of the more recent and important stories that have been suppressed by the media cartels and powers-that-be.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 07:57 AM by DigitalHero


I've red about ACIO about year ago on Wingmakers site [google it]. I thought that most of it was a myth..but since there is a lot of new info and this video shows that it may be true, I consider to think about that as a true.




[edit on 18-11-2008 by DigitalHero]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 03:11 PM by EarthCitizen07


reply to post by Anonymous ATS



I agree with you. The president has clearance to see anything he wants whenever he wants, unless off course our constitution and legal system is a total fraud.

Now they might claim "no access" but more-than-likely this is simply a case of legal maneuvering to remove all potential liability. For example when we have a case of corporate fraud how often do the executives say: "Oh...really, I never knew this happened because no one told me...."



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 03:44 PM by EarthCitizen07


[edit on 18-11-2008 by EarthCitizen07]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-11-2008 @ 06:07 PM by Epsillion70


Originally posted by DangerDeath
Secret knowledge - is an oxymoron. And worse...

What does it mean? You have some knowledge, but you want to keep it secret. This forces you to act in denial of your knowledge.

Denial of knowledge is ignorance.

Now, how does it work?

This "secret knowledge" affects us (others) even though we don't know what it is. It is so because those who possess secret knowledge turn everybody else (those who don't have their secret knowledge) into enemies, into those from whom they guard their "secret" knowledge.

Facing secret knowledge is like facing vacuum. It draws you out of your skin.

You try to fill this vacuum with your imagination, and that's all you get - fantasy...

The real consequence is that you are rendered passive, or reactive - you react to ignorance, you are powered by ignorance.

Let's try to be creative.

What is the effect of those who keep secrets (sometimes in our names)?
Animosity. Division. Opposition.


What are the possibilities?

1 - There are aliens who are exactly the same as our governments - secretive, inimical, institutionalized, power-mongering, hypocritical, etc...

Perhaps it is better for all of us to stay away from them...

2 - There are aliens who only communicate with individuals (those who are not delegated to speak in other people's names).

There would be no need to prove such contacts, since they are exclusively personal. Nor would that be possible. (Anarchist aliens ).

3 - There are no aliens. The very idea of aliens turned into "secret knowledge" generates enough black energy to make certain things inherent to the establishment run - secrecy, illegal activities and practices, claiming that certain information are confidential.

Let's be practical, the third option seems to me the most operational.

It can be used by the ptb any time and in any occasion when their responsibility for what they do is demanded. They always hide behind secrecy (denial of knowledge).

Someone is trying to sell us this idea of 38 levels above top secret because it is a perfect way to claim IGNORANCE where ignorance should be a disqualifying criteria for anyone in office!!!

Think about it. This is the tangible evidence we have.




Knowledge like Truth is always there, it may however be hidden or out of view in the same way clouds block out the Sun but don't make it disappear.

One merely has to have the willing mindful intent and knowledge will make itself present. How you experience and act on that knowledge is completely up to oneself. Though only two outcomes are only ever possible;
Embrace and accept it or deny and reject it.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4  >>





























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.012 seconds
Page processed in 0.275 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.