Some predictions of the Bible code., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 1-4-2004 @ 12:16 PM by lilblam
Originally posted by infinite
lets say the bible codes are real and accurate, how can a human being write a detail book with hidden messages containing messages about the future?? u really think a human being is able to write a book, with a mathematical formula to give out accurate messages?


But you're ASSUMING they are real and accurate! If, and ONLY if that assumption were true (and we don't know this), then there are 2 options.

1. Humans used computers to do this (not good for 2000 years ago).

2. More advanced beings "inspired" this to humans.
=================

However, because we cannot assume that any bible codes are real and accurate, you cannot state with certainty that humans did not write the Bible, at least not by looking at Bible Code as support for that statement!

Edit: With enough work, the Bible can be written as it is with REAL codes in it, by humans without computers. You should look at some WARS and the messages that were sent by the countries in code, where the message said ONE THING in plain language, but if you know the code to decypher it, you get an entirely different message.

Instead of a "Hi, how are you? What lovely whether we have outside!"

You get a "The fascists are on the east bank of this river" or something (only the original message is much longer, to incorporate this code of course.

Therefore, I annot even make the assumption that computers are required for this sort of thing, since it has been done by humans without the aid of machines before! I wouldn't underestimate our minds...

And once again, you don't know if the Bible Code is accurate, do you?

[Edited on 1-4-2004 by lilblam]



reply posted on 1-4-2004 @ 01:02 PM by lilblam
Originally posted by infinite


And once again, you don't know if the Bible Code is accurate, do you?


the bible code hasn't been proven wrong yet, So you have to believe that someone higher then a human wrote this complex book.

Just because something hasn't been proven wrong, doesn't mean it has been proven right. Until you know one way or another, it is foolish to assume anything, as your assumption can end up being completely false, so what benefit is it to you to pretend before you truly know? How do you prove anything like this anyway? Isn't it a matter of being convinced or not, individually? For example, if seeing "Hitler" and "Nazi" next to each other on one bit of the bible code is sufficient proof for you, that is your choice. It may not, however, be sufficient for someone else. In this sense, proof of this sort is just "subjectively sufficient (or not) evidence", which his not proof at all, as it is not objective.

How does one obtain objectively conclusive knowledge of the validity of this code or lack thereof? Well, if you start seeing amazingly accurate things in the code of Moby Dick, or any other fat book, then it would seem that all books are heaven-inspired with codes. If you see evidence that other books have codes, then you must ask yourself if it's possible that all literature is written by someone other than people (which is false), or perhaps the codes are not really codes, but wishful thinking on the part of the determined humans who're looking for specific things and don't stop until the find them.


The software used to find the codes is done on orignal text, but i have seen with my own eyes, the words "Nazi" and "Hitler" in the same passage.
These messages are soo detailed we can easily tell what events they are reffering to.

You honestly think a human beings over 2000 years ago sat down and wrote the bible, with codes??


If it is possible, then I cannot assume whether it's true or false. It IS possible, and just because you cannot think of a good enough reason or motivation to do this, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Some people do pretty "strange" and "amazing" things, if properly motivated. Also, humans could've had outside assistance for writing this in CODES.

However, this is only assuming that the codes are any more valid than Moby Dick codes etc.

In conclusion, regardless of whether the codes are valid or not, with enough effort, time, and determination, this book and others could've been written. Now look at the result of this book and what major effect it has on the world, and how many people are put into control of OTHERS thanks to this book and others like it. Some people, when tempted at the prospect of control and domination, will go to extremes to accomplish what they want.


reply posted on 1-4-2004 @ 01:03 PM by lilblam
Originally posted by infinite
Originally posted by darklanser
I have the program that looks for bible codes. You can import any text and try the same lookups. The text that you import cannot have any spaces. The letters are written one after the other. They say this is how the bible was written. The problem I have with this is that you can import the KJV bible, *torah, *tanakh, *talmud...etc. Which is correct? If there was a mathematical formula contained within the texts of "the bible", over the thousands of years of copying it verse for verse, word for word, letter for letter....one tiny mistake could throw the entire code off. In todays programming languages, coding is very specific and difficult. One wrong syntax and it wipes the whole code out. This is a highly debatable subject.

The Talmud is a vast collection of Jewish laws and traditions.
The Torah refers to the Five Books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
The Tanakh or Written Torah is the Old Testament.

All of these texts can be sifted for equidistant letter sequences (ELS). Does that make them otherworldly?


as your reffering to holy books, i find it hard to believe that humans can write scared text. Either they never wrote them OR humans were helped. Books like these are too comlex to just sit down and right.


Who said someone just sat down and wrote it? APparently it took thousands of years...
Also, if you pay attention to history, every time somebody seemed to doubt something (like that humans can fly) etc, they very often have been proven wrong later. Why would this happen? Simple: ASSUMPTIONS.

You are assuming that it's not possible because it's so complex. You are assuming based on your idea that the human mind isn't capable of this. You can stick to this belief till the day you die, but it still will not make it true - the belief that this book could NOT possibly be written by humans.

The day after you die, we may find proof that indeed it was written by a determined group over a period of many years, so what good is it to assume?

[Edited on 1-4-2004 by lilblam]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Strange Sounds, The Dogon, Sirius B and The Bullroarer.
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
The Mahdi does not negotiate. Neither should we
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
When Video Games Predict The Future.
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
Prophecies of Rasputin
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
HEADS UP! Prediction in "The Conspiracy Theory" movie: 4/23/12
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
Hopi-Tibetan Prophecy
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
Sky sounds = "World Wide Sounding of Ram Horn"?
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 6 hours ago, 57 replies
Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 15 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 11 hours ago, 52 replies