It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
reply to post by -zeropoint-
Nevermind. Go back to watching TV. Gee, isn't MSLCD great?
Do you have anything to back up your arguement? Certainly, if I can be asked to back up my arguement without being asked to rely on self-responsiblity to come to my conclusions you must believe the proof is left to the individual who makes the statement!
I personally predict no one who has had an Obamamy will look into the facts deep enough to see the truth.
[edit on 16-11-2008 by HillbillyHippie]
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
reply to post by -zeropoint-
A prejudice comment that shows your true colors - I never said I was conservative, nor would I EVER be neo-conservative.
Why must such people who claim liberty and freedom always put such ugly labels on those who disagree with them?
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
reply to post by jimmyx
Good point. Now my question was, is that good for us as a people?
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
reply to post by -zeropoint-
Once again "first low" is an excuse, not an arguement.
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
Is it even conceivable that Barack Hussein Obama could receive the required security clearance for the United States Presidency given his known associations?
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
Is it even conceivable that Barack Hussein Obama could receive the required security clearance for the United States Presidency given his known associations?
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
reply to post by neformore
How do Bush's horrible appointments towards our country's national security make Obama's election and appointments any better? YES, your arguement is poor.
If you give one ounce of a damn about our country how do Bush's actions make Obama's any better given our knowledge about associations?
Since I am not a Neo-con as some would like to suggest (simply because they love and worship Obama which is weird in itself)
Should we, as Americans be concerned when ANY president has associations with or appoints cabinet members who are questionable towards National Security concerns? Could this issue be why we seem to be screwed in the first place? Could it be that we keep electing presidents who don't care about US?
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
reply to post by jimmyx
First, why attack the messenger, nothing constructive to say?
Second, I fail to see how your comment nullifies my point? It only strengthens it by making clear that something need be done.
4 years (2008-2012) of Bush and his crew did it does not solve the problem. Are you that indoctrinated by the television and newspapers to not see that? How do your statements answer the question other than placing blame (which does nothing)?
Are you on some political side, or are you on the side of the Constitution and the American people?
aahh yes...here it comes, you questioning my patriotism...what a shocker!!! that boat has long left the dock and is now just tiresome
ok..i will put it simply for you...obama was elected president, therefore he has the highest clearance as any other president has ever had.
his "associations" have nothing to do with his security clearance, therefore your original point is moot (not of any consideration)
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie
What was asked of him and BY WHOM? By whom is the most important.
Have you asked or has the money behind him? Where is the strength behind your arguement accept by money (which you hate because of Bush)?
Have you asked where Obama's money came from?