Monsanto Genetically Modified Foods to End Life on Earth, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 31 times


reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 03:01 PM by antar
reply to post by Dulcimer



Dulcimer! I am shocked at your lead on this one...

Can you provide one shred of evidence "FOR" GMO'S which could possibly validate your stance? Are you serious?

Even people who work for the companies which produce the GMO's call them Terminator seeds...

A simple Google search will give you mountains of information as to why these GMOs need to be stopped. Do you think that they placed even a single GMO seed in any of the food vaults? Why on earth do you suppose they needed to place real natural organic seeds in vaults in the first place? Think about it for just a minute, I am sure you can put 2+2 together and get 4 right?

Sheeze.


reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 03:16 PM by Dulcimer
We had seed vaults because there are numerous plants that become "extinct" every year just like animals.

Do they contain GM seeds... I dunno, I guess they could because they are all separated and storied individually.

As for terminator seeds:


The decision by the biotechnology giant Monsanto never to commercialise so-called "terminator gene" technology for crops has been called "a major U-turn that will send shock waves across the industry", by the charity Christian Aid.


news.bbc.co.uk...

Are there other plans in the works? Yep, but they are different.

Any farmer in the world could produce terminator technology. I could grow wheat, take the raw seed and microwave it and sell it to you. It would make tasty products, but you couldn't grow it if I did it right.

The germination is nearly destroyed.

This already occurs with hemp seeds.

The future of terminator technology will be in applying some sort of technology to the seed in which you will require other Monsanto products to produce a quality crop.

Its the old razor, razor blade formula. It works every time.



reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 03:26 PM by Brothers
Originally posted by skeptic_al
Originally posted by seenitall
Theoretically, GM crops shouldn't be any different than the normal crops except that they contain genetic code for proteins from different organisms. Something like an unexpected allergic reaction may happen once in a while etc.

It is possible that some crops are causing other issues, but I doubt it.

You also have to weigh this all up against the fact that without GM crops, we wouldn't have nearly as much food on the planet. However, this is not to say that I agree with Monsanto's methods, especially concerning fisheries, where gene flow between escaped GM fish and wild populations could cause ecosystem collapses.

*** I need to see the source studies before I can comment on the sterility, disease etc issues.


[edit on 16-11-2008 by seenitall]

[edit on 16-11-2008 by seenitall]


making more food is not the answer, it just allows the allows the
existing problem tp proliferate even more.

There are simply too many people on the planet, perhaps providing
free condoms for Africa, China, Japan and America would be a better
solution. And possibly some form of baby license prior to copulation is
needed.



Sorry. But condoms for Japan. The population of Japan is shrinking because no one wants to have children. Its one of many countries in this world whos population is going down. American population is up only because of the immigration. The regular Americans are having less children. India, China ,Africa and other nations where there is no education is on the rise. Also, did you know that some countries are saving the native seeds of plants and trees for future generations??? Because they know that someday we will need it when GM foods are no longer produced.


reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 05:15 PM by Phatcat
reply to post by Cool Hand Luke



Several studys have shown a tendency that we, as a species, are becoming less fertile though.

Not saying this is caused by this, but coupled with the sterile nature of said seeds, would it not be prudent to at least investigate the link ?


reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 06:16 PM by Cool Hand Luke
Originally posted by shortanconfused

What do you mean the plants use less pesticides? The plants produce the pesticides themselves. All this eliminates is the dangers of workers having to spray the plants and the the money spent having to constantly buy pesticides/herbicides.


I believe you answered your own question.

Also, you are mistaken. GM crops do not always produce higher yields of crops than non-GM crops. For example, a study of hundreds of soybeans fields showed that non-GM crops actually had a general trend of having higher yields than the GM crops.


I am going to assume you are using the numbers from the link you posted earlier. Those figures are from 1999. And even in the article they admit that many crops had higher crop yields. From the article:

In the six crop/region combinations where Bt crops or herbicide tolerant crops (HTCs) fared better, they exhibited increased yields between 5-30%


Now I understand what the article is saying but those figures are from 9 years ago. I would be very curious if those numbers have not improved significantly as the demand to buy GM seeds has increased a great deal.

Yes, it may require less energy to use certain GM crops, but once those plants exhaust your soil because you mono-cropped the # out of it, what available energy is left then? None, because you created arid, worthless land.


Is that not the farmer's choice how to use their land? If they decide to overuse their soil, how does that in anyway lay responisbility on a company like monsanto? Plus was that not always a danger even before GM crops were started?

Of course we've been eating GM crops for the past 10 years. Does that make it OK? NO! There's much too much evidence against GM crops to call it a "hunch" that it is bad. Do a little research before you decide to make a post like that again.


People keep getting healthier and healthier and living longer and longer. That fact has not stopped for the last ten years. In fact it has increased.

Please read through the article I posted above before you respond to this post.


I did and certainly does not "crush" GM crops. It also uses figures from many years ago. Techonology keeps improving. I would be like if used statistics from a cellphone from ten years ago against an iPhone. Apples and Oranges.

Also if you notice in the article it uses alot "it may do this" or "may be related to this" when it has no reason to make these assumptions. Well my gas tank "may" explode, should I stop driving my car?


reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 09:08 PM by shortanconfused
reply to post by Cool Hand Luke



gah! i had a long, thought out reply to this but accidentally opened a link and it opened a new page, losing everything i typed. i'll have to get back to you later when i'm not extremely busy studying for finals. Well thought out response though. karma's a bitch, eh?

Basically, IMO, pesticides/herbicides don't belong in our crops, especially ones that are supposed to be "fit for human consumption". There are natural ways to counteract this, that actually increase the fertility of the soil and health of the crops. Pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, etc all build up in your system to create toxic states, allowing for the perfect environment for cancers and other diseases to form.

Yes, it's an old article, but the message is still just as relevant. We do not know the effects of GM crops on our immune systems in the long term yet we are already consuming them. there has barely been any independent research done on the effects of GM crops.

[edit on 16-11-2008 by shortanconfused]



reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 10:35 PM by skeptic_al
reply to post by Cool Hand Luke



Perhaps it's the bigger picture that you can't see
If all Crops were GM, then bugs and animals and won't eat it unless
nothing else left. That might be good right?, if the bugs die due to lack of
food then that will effect the entire food chain. Alternativly the Bugs turn
into Super Bugs being resiliant to anything we throw at them.

Putting all life at risk because of few bean counters and lawyers deciding
what lives and whats dies has to be a really bad idea.

Nature has been doing this for donkeys years by cross pollination of near
similar plants. But mad scientists come along and start inserting parts of
salmon DNA into things like corn. It's not that different from science
screwing around with better ways to kill bugs. Kitchen Anti-Bacteria that
kills 99.99% of bugs, the .01% that survives starts breeding like rabbits
and becomes a super bug. Nature always finds a way to survive in any
given environment.

Then there's the other thing scientists like to do, Introduce a new species
into a environment to kill a known pest. The cure then becomes a bigger
pest than the pest you were trying to get rid off. Unlike a computer,
Nature does not have an Undo button.


The big difference is Nature makes minor changes taking hundreds of
thousands of years, but these mad scientists want to achive the same
results within a few years.


reply posted on 17-11-2008 @ 03:36 AM by Maxit
Originally posted by Dulcimer
There is so much B.S. in this thread its hard to take it all in. The members of ATS like to scream disinfo all the time, but funny how it doesn't come up when they do not realize they are doing it themselves.

People need to get the facts straight.

If you want to bash the health effects of GM foods you need to produce the documents confirming years of research.

In my opinion the entire effort has not been around long enough to produce concrete scientific fact to say that either A) GM is ok or B) GM is killing us all.


Im surprised nobody has brought up "terminator technology" into this discussion yet.

If Monsanto controlled the food supply they would have a better stock price instead of nearing a 52 week low and going into the toilet.




Do you still believe in stock charts? For me they are just rubbish. they demonstrate nothing.

Nature must be left alone, it worked perfectly for billions of years and if we wouldn't messed up everything it would continue to work perfectly for other billions of years. Nature is a wonderful mechanism and I believe we don't have a clue of what may happen when you try to alter the laws of nature.

Monsanto and al the others are to be considered no less than terrorists, OGM are a crime against humanity amd should be banned forever. Unfortunately a lot of people don't even know what is a OGM, greed do the rest so the only way to stop this would be a collective uprising against it but, as for many other things in this corrupted world, sheeples are good to their masters.

In Europe we are still resisting OGM but our beloved authorities are pushing more and more to become like the US, a "poisoned country" with "poisoned" people (I have nothing against the US people of course).

Don't mess with nature!!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 17 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags