posted on Nov, 15 2008 @ 03:27 PM
reply to post by jsobecky
I am not a Signature Expert in any way, but I find it weird that someone's signature is not allowed to change over a 25 year time span. It seems
like a ridiculous premise to put forward, without first looking at anything besides Obama's most recent signatures for comparison.
Obama would have been 18 when he signed up for Selective Service. His signature now, would be much more refined after years of signing documents. I
would like anyone in the world to show me examples of documents signed 25 years apart where the signatures are exact, especially after the person has
signed as many things as Obama would have. Try it, go find one of your College papers, and I imagine fyour hand writing has changed a great deal.
Besides that, I find it strange that the "O" in Obama is not at all the same.
In a previous thread, I noted that Obama's 'O' was reminiscent of the Alchemical Symbol for Sulphiric Acid, but in the 'older' signature, that
meaning would be changed, seemingly to represent the 'mineral kingdom'
If the signature proves to be 'authentic' on the selective service form, then either my theory about Obama's use of symbols is shot, or at least he
had not yet gained the knowledge in 1980 at such an early age. If the signature from 1980 is fake, then I imagine Obama will have some explaining to
do, but it is very likely that both Signatures are his regardless of possible embedded symbolism.
Who better to bring "Change" than a man who uses 'Sulfuric Acid' as a symbol in his signature, right? I guess if you want that 'Change' be
eaten with holes....
VOTE for H2SO4!