Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama, page 2

Check out this response from one of the commentors - in response to the Postal Stamp on the document:

Posted by: Bones at November 14, 2008 03:24 AM

I have two points to make in regards to this matter of the alleged 'phony' Selective Service registration. (I believe it is phony.)
First, if Barack were not a citizen, would he be required to register just because he lived here in the U. S.? That could explain why there was no authentic registration from 1980. He needs to cover his tracks by producing one now to lend credence to the lie that he's a citizen.
As for the second matter of the incomplete or questionable 'postmark', I can speak with some authority on the subject as I was a postal employee for over 30 years from before 1970. This mark is created by a 'round dater' stamp. Each one was assigned to a specific employee and included an identifying number unique to the employee whose 'round dater' was used. That way, a 'postmark' could be traced back to its origin if a question of its authenticity ever came up. A 'postmark' was considered so reliable and sacrosanct that it could be used as evidence in court. This was an accountable item and was kept under lock and key at all times when it wasn't in the possession of the individual authorized to have and use it and it was never allowed outside of the Post Office. It is a federal offense to postmark an item with any date other than the date on which the item was actually stamped. (There was a famous case where there was a contest to guess the final score for some athletic contest, a Superbowl or World Series, and the letters with the guesses had to be 'postmarked' prior to the event taking place. A group of postal employees conspired together and used a 'round dater' to illegally postmark their entries after the game was completed so they knew the score. They were caught and convicted.) Once the old 'Post Office Department' was reorganized into the new 'USPS' / U. S. Postal Service in the 1970's, new 'round daters' would have been issued. Apparently someone in the Chicago machine has been able to find one of these obsolete stampers that was spirited out of the system from years ago and probably uses it when the need arises. The missing '19' from the year '1980' is probably because they don't have the full set of numbers to change out the entire date or they weren't familiar with the way the 'round dater' was used. Also, the employee's identifying number is missing that would show to whom this particular 'round dater' was assigned.
It seems our only hope for a legitimate outcome to this travesty of justice is the Supreme Court or God himself. I'm not holding out much hope. We've been thwarted at every turn so far.

S&F - I can't believe we are now questioning the SSS registration of the President Elect. His life is like a slice of swiss-cheese.