Originally posted by X-tal_Phusion
...but I'm hesitant to explain anything in terms of faith and/or spiritual manifestations. Our ancestors invoked magic and myth to describe what they
did not understand and to me, it feels like a crutch when we have science.
Perhaps our ancestors
did actually have a good understanding of what they faced in their time.
Oh absolutely there are myths and legends that really defy belief - for instance one of ours is that a mythical figure called Maui literally fished up
our North Island. Yeah. Okay. Good luck on that one...
However whether or not what they held a belief in - however *unscientific* - is a crutch or not is debateable. To me its not so much whether something
is spiritual or whether its scientific...its whether it works for you consistantly that matters.
For instance: My wife has this fancy smancy potato peeler...the thing looks like something out of the 25th century...its all ergonomical this, moulded
that, titanium the other. Cost something ridiculous like $80! For a potato peeler! Lucky it was given to us as a wedding present...
Me - I just use the same cheap sharp knife that I use to core the pumpkin, slice the mushrooms, 'julian' the carrots.
...end result is that the potatoes get peeled.
Having faith in the phenomenon won't help us to learn how to take control of our own environment. The best way to do that is to collect,
analyze, and present evidence. Evidence is data and data helps us to generate hypotheses (testable questions) which in turn may lead to theories
(models with a reasonable level of predictability). Having the capacity to predict events with some level of certainty gives us control. The more we
know, the more options we have.
Absolutely the more we know the more options we have. However on what basis, what 'cut off point' do we stop accepting possible options?
I guess a possible answer to that would be: At the point that those options are not scientifically verifiable.
Which is fair enough really...or else you may as well accept absolutely everything...right down to Ronald McDonald wearing a Tooth Fairy outfit did
it.
So I can totally see the danger in having no real 'vetting' method in regards to what is and isn't accepted as 'options' and how those options
are appraised.
For me again the appraisal, the proof, is in the pudding - or the potato.
Does having faith in something impeed us from learning how to control our environment? Well I guess in some way that could be seen as being dependent
on whether your
environment only/purely consists of what is scientifically verifiable or not.
I feel as though relying on the spiritual realm, while it is comforting to many, relinquishes control over our own fate.
Perhaps again its a case of relying on what works for the person.
Proof is such a kettle-o-fish word. To many that word, Proof, is defined as that which is analytically verifiable. That can be logically,
independently (again, scientifically and consistantly) objectively proven. Fair enough.
Proof for others is a subjective word...and yes I'm aware of the pitfalls of subjectivity...just because someone may believe that Ronald McDonald is
wearing a Tooth Fairy outfit and doing it, doesn't mean its so.
So we come to relinquishing control over our own fate.
Is control over ones own fate a monopoly offshoot/outcome of the spiritual or the scientific?
I know I've heard it numerous times - and please, I'm certainly NOT saying this is something you feel, its a comment in general from what I've read
on many forums, other media, heard from others I've spoken with etc - that there is a feeling...at times a very strong assertion...that things like
faith and spiritually are the bastion of the weak-minded.
Of those who are perhaps 'too lazy to think any more', instead find it easier to simply say "Its ghosts" or "God did it" <-- read that many
times right here on ATS.
Where I'm coming from is this: I kinda think that we all draw our lines in the sand. We all have things we accept as our 'building blocks' if you
will upon which we form our beliefs, what we hold to be true, what we accept as our reality.
Some may draw those lines based on less verifiable building blocks...they may well be building blocks that they have found effective/valid, that they
have found via experience ring true for them.
Others prefer the hard concrete undeniable building blocks that can be shown to be concrete, shown to be blocks, shown to be built upon. Cool as.
Now...
if you have those blocks...be they woo-woo or be they concrete...and if they are consistantly working for you...do you
still
continue to build with them - or do you switch to using building-triangles, or building-spheres.
At some point we accept *something* as the building method or building material. At some point we place our *faith* in something...whatever that is.
So I guess at some point then perhaps we may be seen as reliquishing some form of control via that acceptance of *something* as our building block.
IF however that building block later crumbles...well...we then go looking for a better one. But until it does, then we tend to stick with it.
To me I kinda feel that we relinquish some amount of 'control' when we accept something as a given of sorts. We take some kind of 'breather' when
we do so. We stop 100% 'thinking' - if only a little tiny bit - when we accept something as *true*...be that *truth* a spiritual one or a scientific
one.
Bit like a "Okay. Got it now. It works. Its shown to work. I'll tackle the next unknown now" kinda thing.
At some point we reliquish our 'control' to the method and/or material.
For instance: If we take a mathematical equation, we feed in a number and we get a result. We feed in another number and we get a result. Who/what has
the
real control over the result there?
Is it the person feeding in the number or the equation? Or both?
Probably about to get slammed to the eyeballs by all the Mathematicians and Scientists (of which I'm patently not one

) in the house for saying
that...but please know I mean NO offence by that at all and also likely didn't convey my intended message properly...
...hopefully
some sense was made there though...
peace.
*editted as I can't spell worth a damn...
[edit on 18-11-2008 by alien]