Originally posted by salty-red
i think he was replying to a post a month ago at the beginning of this thread
I think so. That was a reminder of certain numbers having a strong association with the subject based on history.
12/12/2008 was a stunning performance on the part of the manipulator. First, he goes to Japan and convinces the Japanese traders that the US Senate
rejected to provide financial help to beleaguered Japanese automakers. Under severe mind control, the traders finished the NIKKEI session with a
Japan's Nikkei 225 Average plunged as much as 6 percent but closed 5.6 percent lower [NIKKEI 8235.87 -484.6797 (-5.56%) ] led by steep losses in
shares of carmakers. Toyota Motor nosedived 10 percent while Honda Motor and Nissan Motor both dived around 12 percent.
Seeing the carnage, the market analysts knew that when NYSE trading is over, the shares of GM, Chrysler and Ford would incur severe losses. But the
manipulator had a word with the traders assuring them that the Big 3 are in a relatively good shape. At the end of the session, Ford shares gained
4.83%. But some traders showed resistance to the insane suggestion that all is well with the US auto industry, and GM lost 4.35% -- almost three
times LESS than its counterparts in Japan. Shouldn't that be the other way around?
The bold question ushers in once again the concept of opposites, and since we know a bit about how the mind of the manipulator works, we can look at
the Dow result from 12/12/2008 and see the uncanny precision which the mind manipulator can control the market -- and more.
Looking at LAST, its apparent what kind of template was used to arrive at this figure: AB and BA are opposites, so are 86 and 68.
>> LAST: 8629.68 => 862968 => (86)29(68)
We also see something familiar between the opposites 86 and 68: Does number 29 refer to the Crash of '29?
It could, because on 12/11, the day before, we added the YES and NO votes in the Senate tohether and the result was a reference to the most recent
market crash of '87: 35 + 52 = 87.
That must have been a very inspiring idea for the manipulator resulting in (86)29(68).
But number 29 could show up due to an unrelated coincidence, and we need to find out about that. In order to do so, we attempt to find a unique
>> 29 = x + y.
There are many possibilities to solve the equation, but they may not be all equal. How would we justify this choice?
>> 29 = 20 + 9.
We look at the next Dow figure for an answer: CHANGE: 64.59.
It becomes apparent that the LAST and the CHANGE figures are made from the same dough -- they are made of opposites. In the latter case 4 and 5 are
flanked by 6 and 9, which are opposites due to the fact that 6 turned upside down is 9. So let's write down the similarity in LAST == CHANGE:
>> (86)29(68) == (6)4.5(9)
Having done that, we will try to relate the middle figures.
>> 29 == 4.5 ?
Both numbers are nearly impossible to relate using a simple equation, unless an adjustment is made to 29 through 29 = 20 + 9.
>> 20 + 9 == 4.5 ?
The relationship is simple, because 20 = 4 x 5
and 9 = 4 + 5
. And that's the justification for the solution of 29 = x + y
Now, where the 4x5 and 4+5 idea come from; where did the manipulator see this move to get inspired by? I'm pretty positive that he got the 4 and 5
digits from the Senate vote: YES = 5
2 votes, NO = 34
In other words, he was looking at our suggestion to add and multiply the Senate votes and used the concept to arrive at his own results.
Well, Salty, we are getting closer to design a future event. I told you: If the manipulator likes our concept, he will use it to manipulate the world.
Now, let's take that middle 29 from the Friday Dow close, which was 8629.68 points and set up a comparison based on opposites:
>> TOGETHER is to 29 as APART is to ?
How far apart 2 and 9 should be? 2-9, 2--9, 2---9, or more?
Since there would be an empty space between 2 and 9, and nothing is zero, how many zeroes should be there between 2 and 9?
Since the past and the future is measured in time units, like years, for example, there should be two zeroes between 2 and 9:
>> TOGETHER is to 29 as APART is to 2009
Salty, if 29 refers to the Crash of '29, do you think we would have a nice, glorious market crash in 2009?
My guess is that there would be no crash, unless we design it.
Btw, the name of the ET mind manipulator is Pi, which translates Opposite. He arrived from Vega Tau star system the last summer and signed in.
[edit on 12/14/2008 by stander]