Bush pardons himself, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 38 times


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 12:45 PM by snowen20
reply to post by Marcus Calpurnius




Well what can we say about that?
Looks like you’ve made up your mind.
Thank you.

[edit on 14-11-2008 by snowen20]


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 12:45 PM by Level X
reply to post by all2human




***** THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION EXIT STRATEGY *****

1. Create a financial 911 to distract the American people.

2. Close Guantanamo Bay to hide and destroy all evidence. (funny how America hates Cuba but are loving enough to have a prison there)

3. Bush and Cheney lower gas prices to dupe the masses one last time before his late night get away. Cheney - "Americans aren't smart enough to think of our blunders while fillin their gas tanks."

4. Rice - "Play dumb as a horse apple as the American morons are all aglow over the first black president." Mean while... She, Cheney, and Bush are scrubbing the place down with republican Bleach.

5. Rebublicans - "Be on your best behavior... Bushy boy you're almost out of office... a few more days and we'll have pulled off a reversed Divinci Code."

6 Bush - "Make sure Condi stays a unic and never marries... cause we don't want no post administration gap toothed pillow talk with no blabber mouthed Mandingo."

[edit on 14-11-2008 by Level X]


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 01:51 PM by djpaec
Japanese Water Boarding

Twenty-one years earlier, in 1947, the United States charged a Japanese officer, Yukio Asano, with war crimes for carrying out another form of waterboarding on a U.S. civilian. The subject was strapped on a stretcher that was tilted so that his feet were in the air and head near the floor, and small amounts of water were poured over his face, leaving him gasping for air until he agreed to talk.

Why do you think they got of good 'ol Alberto Gonzalez was thrown under the bus, it wasn't just cause of the whole politization of the Justice department. He wrote a memo back in 2002. As you'll read the Secretary of State's office, Colin Powell, was against this. Because it was obvious they were looking for loopholes for torture.
lawofwar.org...

"The nature of [a "war" against terrorism] places a high premium on ...factors such as the ability to quickly obtain information from captured terrorists and their sponsors ... and the need to try terrorists for war crimes... [t]his new paradigm renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners..."

Geneva Conventions.
en.wikipedia.org...

It describes minimal protections which must be adhered to by all individuals within a signatory's territory during an armed conflict not of an international character (regardless of citizenship or lack thereof): Noncombatants, combatants who have laid down their arms, and combatants who are hors de combat (out of the fight) due to wounds, detention, or any other cause shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, including prohibition of outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment. The passing of sentences must also be pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

This is why there are those blacksites we send the T words off too. Now if stuff like this goes on at Guantanamo Bay, I believe the supreme court said since it was our land because it was our base, whether we rented it or not.


Now the only thing that gets me with the inhumane treatment that went on in Iraq. Is they prosecuted from the bottom, as opposed to investigation happening. And prosecuting those that gave these orders, like what they did to the Germans in World War 2. Which, if you do you research, looks like it came from the Executive branch and at least from the DOD and DOJ.

Also to the person that said this falls on democrats, old medic I believe, if you watched the video you would know this video is from 2006. And if you didn't pay attention to politics or didn't know Republicans had congress' power from 1994-2006. Now I don't know if this part of the legislation was passed, BUT, why would Bush sign a law/act that reverses this with democrats in power?

[edit on 14-11-2008 by djpaec]


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 04:57 PM by TRAVELS
reply to post by arcnaver



You're missing the point mate, he's a puppet, nothing more...yes he's the dumbest ape on the planet, no he did not orchestrate 9/11...those that did made him sit in a classroom reading a story about a goat when it happened. Kind of an inside joke I'd imagine...he's the monkey,not the organ-grinder...

And as for the topic, this happened over a year ago didn't it? Why talk about it now? You already let this one slip through your fingers America, nice one...



reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 05:11 PM by henry paul
Check this book out: The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. Bush

heres the link:

feralhouse.com...


there is also a FREE downloadable version of the book on the website.


Its incredibly screwed if we let Bush AND Cheney get away with this stuff. Its un-pardonable....

READ THIS BOOK!

Henry


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 05:26 PM by MAINTAL
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Impeachment should be pursued immediately! In order for justice to prevail, all these crooks should be thrown into JAIL! cs


I don't know why anyone is surprised at this. Nixon managed to pull it off why wouldn't dubya. Impeachment wouldn't matter now.

The Democrats never gave a hoot and they had their big chance to get the impeachment process back in 2006 but that wasn't gonna happen with this guy being the Democrats Golden opportunity.

They told Kucinich and Wexler to table the lawsuits and quit rattling chains. Let this President give the American People the full measure of this Bush Fatigue,, then just before he leaves office they would be instrumental in the very last nail in this coffin and one that would crush the neocons reign as the rulling party beating them down as to within an inch of their life as a viable political party.

All they had to do to usher in their longtime goal of converting this contry to socialism is have a dynamic young speaker, it didn't really matter what else he was as long as he was eloquent and said what the American people would be so desperate to hear that the moment Obama said the magic word "Change" people fell to their knees in gullible admiration. A guy with a strong backround in this new conversion would need to crush the current economy to such a drastic degree that nationalizing the economy would be the credit of co-conspirators like Barney Frank and Franklin Raines but the blame for the economy would go to Bush and the Republican party.

All in all, I'd say the democrats would be happy just having Bush leave the most tragedy prone President in history with the most pathetic legacy in Presidential history. I sometimes wonder how he feels knowing that.








[edit on 14-11-2008 by MAINTAL]


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 05:28 PM by djpaec
reply to post by MAINTAL



Yeah all he has to do is Pardon everyone in his admnistration. Then step down, Chenney gets sworn in and pardons Bush.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 10 days ago with 59 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags
White House pressure on Gulf oil leak figures
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags