Originally posted by snowen20
Very well said, I dont know why so many take up for Bush by mentioning Clintons antics.
They do this because they have nothing else to say. They can't counter your argument so they try and muddy the water. It would be like say, if you
had proof that Bush was the devil, they would say "Yeah, well, Clinton sometimes wore red." It makes no sense and in no way counters Bush being the
devil. It only works to muddy the water and in a way change the subject from Bush, to Clinton.
You see, if they allowed themselves to be wrong, which is a good thing from time to time by the way, they would then have to reexamine the logic that
brought them to voting for the worst president in American history. Personally, had I voted for the schmuck this is exactly what I would have done.
That way, the next time I voted I would not make the same mistake again.
But, that would lead them to voting for a Democrat or not voting at all. And of course, voting for a BJ getting, abortion loving, taxing Democrat is
much worse than voting for an illegal war starting, constitution destroying, debt creating imbecile of a Republican.