New Analysis of Oswald’s Backyard Photo – JFK Assassination, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 131 times


reply posted on 13-11-2008 @ 11:20 AM by TylerKing
reply to post by Anonymous ATS


Artist as well, Oswald's shadow edges look too sharp, especially the top, the blades of grass should have broken it up or at least blurred it. It's odd but this thread makes me realize I never really studied this photo, anyone have a really high res copy of it?


reply posted on 13-11-2008 @ 11:31 AM by pieman
reply to post by Badge01


his index finger has a fingernail, i think, but it's quite shortened. this sometimes happens if you bite your nails a lot.


reply posted on 13-11-2008 @ 11:42 AM by Badge01
reply to post by pieman


You may be right. It's blurry. But the other three fingers' ends have been cropped.

Be interesting to see a negative. Not sure there is one.


reply posted on 13-11-2008 @ 11:43 AM by DocMoreau
Originally posted by NGC2736
Considering the time the photo would have been doctored, early 60's, this would not have been a do-it-yourself type job by someone like the Dallas police. It would have been a "perfect" work of art requiring the skills of an agency like the FBI or the CIA, in my opinion. (They couldn't know the progress of photo research ability now, 4 1/2 decades later.)


But they would have had a better sense of photo research ability now, back in 1992.
President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992
The Act requires that each assassination record be publicly disclosed in full, and be available in the collection no later than the date that is 25 years after the date of enactment of the Act (i.e., October 26, 2017), unless the President of the United States certifies that: (1) continued postponement is made necessary by an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations; and (2) the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.


If I remember correctly, the assassination record was originally scheduled for release 40 years after the Warren Commission was released, so 2003. Obviously, that didn't work for their overall 'Plan'. Perhaps we advanced too quickly, technology wise, and our medicine has kept too many people alive, and our photo analysis got too good too fast.

I don't know...
DocMoreau

Edit to add, I need caffeine, so upon rereading, I am not sure what I doing with some of the grammar, but I am not sure how to say what I am trying to say otherwise. Please be kind.

[edit on 13/11/2008 by DocMoreau]


reply posted on 13-11-2008 @ 12:15 PM by paradigm619
reply to post by pieman


That makes sense, but in the picture, it looks like there are only two folds (folded in thirds). You'd have to really do some creative folding to make an opposing page align itself like that and still look like a newspaper folded into thirds.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags