It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Syria Storing Iraq's WMDs
By Bill Gertz
Washington Times | October 29, 2003
Iraqi military officers destroyed or hid chemical, biological and nuclear weapons goods in the weeks before the war, the nation's top satellite spy director said yesterday.
Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. James Clapper, head of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, said vehicle traffic photographed by U.S. spy satellites indicated that material and documents related to the arms programs were shipped to Syria.
Other goods probably were sent throughout Iraq in small quantities and documents probably were stashed in the homes of weapons scientists, Gen. Clapper told defense reporters at a breakfast.
Gen. Clapper said he is not surprised that U.S. and allied forces have not found weapons of mass destruction hidden in Iraq because "it's a big place."
The DRUDGE Report links to this story at:
www.observer.co.uk...
DNA tests after missiles strike 'Saddam convoy'
Human remains removed after US Hellfire missiles target source of dictator's satellite phone call
Jason Burke in Baghdad
Sunday June 22, 2003
The Observer
American specialists were carrying out DNA tests last night on human remains believed by US military sources to be those of Saddam Hussein and one of his sons, The Observer can reveal.
The remains were retrieved from a convoy of vehicles struck last week by US forces following 'firm' information that the former Iraqi leader and members of his family were travelling in the Western Desert near Syria.
Military sources told The Observer that the strikes, involving an undisclosed number of Hellfire missiles, were launched against the convoy last Wednesday after the interception of a satellite telephone conversation involving either Saddam or his sons.
The operation, which has not yet been disclosed by the Pentagon, involved the United States air force and ground troops of the Third Armoured Cavalry Regiment based around Ramadi, a major town 70 miles west of Baghdad.
Despite previously unfounded US claims that Saddam had been killed during the bombing of Baghdad before the invasion by America and Britain, the sources indicated that they were cautiously optimistic that they had finally killed the target they described as 'the top man'.
By the way, if you are developing to develop by why of developing the ability to develop WMD, is that still a crime?
Originally posted by Shoktek
Maybe admit that you were wrong, and look like less of a fool in the long run...you're not tricking anybody, at least those who can think logically.
Originally posted by John Nada
I think the the funny thing here is that it's a bit of a stand off, and neither of our sides can be fully proved until they are found (if). As long as they are not found we are right and your documents don't mean squat, and if they were found you would blow us away. Personally I wont trust anything, including documents from ANY nation from ANY government. I could get my nan to type them up, it doesn't make them anymore true.
Originally posted by TheEXone
If not now then later. Eventualy those sanctions would have had to be lifted, and Saddam would have gone strait back into full military build up. A man like him doesn't just sit back content with what he has, he always wants more power and control. Ten years down the line we would have been in the same situation as 91, except this time maybe Iraq would have had nuclear weapons. And don't forget the thousands of Iraqis that would have continued to be imprisoned, tortured, and excecuted had this war not taken place.
Originally posted by Shoktek
You can play this game as much as you want..no one is guilty for something that you think they MAY do in the future, this is no argument at all. How can you say how it would have been 10 years down the line...you can not.
[Edited on 3-4-2004 by Shoktek]
Maybe admit that you were wrong, and look like less of a fool in the long run...you're not tricking anybody, at least those who can think logically.
Originally posted by Shoktek
You can play this game as much as you want..no one is guilty for something that you think they MAY do in the future, this is no argument at all. How can you say how it would have been 10 years down the line...you can not.
[Edited on 3-4-2004 by Shoktek]
Originally posted by Muaddib
Oh wait...let me guess, he was trying to buy some time to hide candy and milk that those factories were producing...
Originally posted by TheEXone
I can't predict the future you are right, but Saddam already demonstrated that he was capable of threatning the whole region and our vital interests, and there was absolutely no indication he was going to change his ways.
Simple logic leads one to conclude that Saddam would continue to puirsue his dreams of regional domination as soon as he had the chance.