It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MetatronCubensis
So there are 17 different lawsuits now? How can Obama continue to sweep this under the rug?? It's amazing that he is just letting this controversy grow and grow. It's time to produce or he will never live this down. It would look a whole lot better if he produced on his own without being forced to. This is worse than the 2000 election.
2008-11-12 21:24:49 - Is anti-Obama lawyer Philip J. Berg exploiting vulnerable citizens? A complaint to the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court requests an investigation...
...Berg has been disciplined in the past for misconduct:
...He is a threat to vulnerable citizens who tend to believe his false claims and give him money on the false assumption that Berg is acting in good faith. By stealing small amounts of money from people across the nation he has flown under the radar of professional discipline. No competent attorney could have acted as Berg did during the past three months. His behavior in federal court, all of which is a public record, is outrageous.
Originally posted by gordonwest
***-Thank You- America, for being Australia's friend.***
GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Originally posted by Mailman
How can you be so sure he has the ability to lead?
If all this it true, legal citizen or not, Did you vote for sombody that doesnt heed the call of the Supreme court?
Is that the change you voted for?
I think you do not understand the workings of the court:
1) December 1 was the deadline for participants in the Berg case to provide any relevant or supporting evidence for their cases. Obama was (and is) under no obligation to provide anything by that date at all. In fact, it would be unusual for him to do so. Now that the deadline has passed, a judge will decide whether to recommend that the case go to conference at some later date.
2) The purpose of the conference (like the one for the Donofrio case on the 5th) is to decide whether the court will consider the merits of the case. Most cases do not reach this point, and very few are actually considered by the entire court. Don't hold your breath on this one. (source)
Originally posted by malcr
Jesus the desperation. From over here in the UK it is all very amusing at how this election has upset so many people.
There's a mixed race democrat as a president FULL STOP
Originally posted by Irish M1ck
reply to post by MissysWorld
Hey as long as you can back it up with other sources, and it does not provide opinions based off of wild speculation, there's no big deal. You can take a smart attitude if you want, but I am just trying to help you and others from looking foolish by posting up blogs as evidence.