therightperspective.com...*bold emphasis mine
If The Supreme Court Decides...?
At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.
If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.
"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."
Read through the above carefully. At no point do the claims and or assertions being made amount to anything more then conjecture, political perspectives and or individual opinion(s).
In all honesty, I have no dog in the fight per se, nor any vested or veiled interest either way. I guess it's just the oft and ill-mannered representations that chap my backside. This particular thread/title seeming just that... as the SCOTUS hasn't officially requested or ruled on Any aspect of Berg's "case".
... not that they won't or can't, they just haven't at this time.
headline News though, if only it were... as "claimed".
