Cancer Cure Patents, The Smoking Gun

If there is no cure for cancer, why are there so many cancer cure patents?
It isn't like anyone would waste their money on patents that don't work.
As a matter of fact, the claims of these patent holders do not mince words. They state a claim and it is in plain english that anyone can understand. If these and other cures such as:
DCA,
www.studentprintz.com...
www.depmed.ualberta.ca...
cfpub.epa.gov...
MMS,

The Gerson Diet/Therapy,
www.youtube.com...
Cancer Cure that Works,
www.youtube.com...

Hemopurifier,
www.sciencedaily.com...
Are not working, then why would patents make claims such as:

This one claims:
"...is sufficient to render the bacteria, viruses, and/or fungus ineffective to infect normally healthy cells while maintaining the biological usefulness of the blood or other body fluids. "
patft.uspto.gov.../51887 38&RS=PN/5188738

This one claims: (same owner name)
"sufficient to render the bacteria, virus, parasites and/or fungus ineffective to infect or affect normally healthy cells while maintaining the biological usefulness of the blood or other fluids."
patft.uspto.gov...,139,684.PN.&OS=PN/5,1 39,684&RS=PN/5,139,684

This one claims:
"selectively inactivates and/or destroys malignant cells with relatively little damage to normal tissue as compared to conventional radiation therapy procedures."
patft.uspto.gov.../46658 98&RS=PN/4665898

This one claims:
"results in a reduction of tumor mass and may lead to complete eradication of a tumor."
patft.uspto.gov... 2F4323056

Originally posted by imd12c4funn
If there is no cure for cancer, why are there so many cancer cure patents?
It isn't like anyone would waste their money on patents that don't work.

People will often patent something they think works even when it is not yet proven. A lot of free energy machines are patented but you'll see very few videos that claim to be functional examples of such things, and none that do a particularly good job at proving the claims.

[edit on 9-11-2008 by truthquest]

Cures don't make money. Also there's the problem of over-population. This is a type of technology that can affect the masses, and they don't want to have stuff like cures which can ruin the pharmaceutical business. Think about how many prescriptions they are selling now for all types of diseases. Major money..

John Bedini did some very interesting work, following rife's work.

You can now listen to the interview here, where he describes what he did.

www.icehouse.net...
www.icehouse.net...
www.icehouse.net...

You can follow along here where they reference the site during the interview.

www.icehouse.net...

This is a device which you could simply stand next to and be cured for about the cost of 10 cents worth of electricity.. Perhaps one day when we get our act together those technological wonders will be available to the general public...

Who said there is no cure for cancer?

There are treatments and outright cures -- in both mainstream medicine and alternative medicine -- for many types of cancer. There is no conspiracy hiding these cures.

I have an aunt who was diagnosed with cancer a few years back(diagnosed early, thank God), was treated by a regular doctor in a regular hospital, and now the cancer is gone -- although she gets regular check-ups.

I also think some of the "alternative" cures are real.

So your opening statement "If there is no cure for cancer..." is a fallacy. There are cures and nobody is denying that.