posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 05:25 PM
If there is no cure for cancer, why are there so many cancer cure patents?
It isn't like anyone would waste their money on patents that don't work.
As a matter of fact, the claims of these patent holders do not mince words. They state a claim and it is in plain english that anyone can understand.
If these and other cures such as:
DCA,
www.studentprintz.com...
www.depmed.ualberta.ca...
cfpub.epa.gov...
MMS,
The Gerson Diet/Therapy,
www.youtube.com...
Cancer Cure that Works,
www.youtube.com...
Hemopurifier,
www.sciencedaily.com...
Are not working, then why would patents make claims such as:
This one claims:
"...is sufficient to render the bacteria, viruses, and/or fungus ineffective to infect normally healthy cells while maintaining the biological
usefulness of the blood or other body fluids. "
patft.uspto.gov.../51887
38&RS=PN/5188738
This one claims: (same owner name)
"sufficient to render the bacteria, virus, parasites and/or fungus ineffective to infect or affect normally healthy cells while maintaining the
biological usefulness of the blood or other fluids."
patft.uspto.gov...,139,684.PN.&OS=PN/5,1
39,684&RS=PN/5,139,684
This one claims:
"selectively inactivates and/or destroys malignant cells with relatively little damage to normal tissue as compared to conventional radiation therapy
procedures."
patft.uspto.gov.../46658
98&RS=PN/4665898
This one claims:
"results in a reduction of tumor mass and may lead to complete eradication of a tumor."
patft.uspto.gov...
2F4323056