Originally posted by anachryon
I'm working under the assumption that recovery will happen. Maybe not V-shaped, maybe a wide U or an upside-down candy cane. L isn't
something I'm ready to consider in a research sense. It's possible, and my gut takes it into consideration, but my brain is expecting eventual
recovery.
When new companies start up to take advantage of the next bubble, whatever that may be, whenever that may be, the demand will be there and the will
won't be far behind as the money starts to flow. That hoarded money will come out sooner or later unless there's a complete collapse of the U$ a la
the Papiermark.
I think it depends on what people mean by "recovery"
The further the economy spirals thru the reinforcing cycle of unemployement and less consumer spending, the recovery would not imply a return to
previous years prosperity but instead a stop to the decline and then a subsequent rise which will not come close to reaching the heights of the prior
apex.
In regard to the (supply of hoarded money) i am skeptical as to how much money is being hoarded that is not needed to keep there capital base at a
level that meets the minimum requirements after the beating company's took from deleveraging due to asset price falls. I don't see this hoarded
money as being "inflationary ammo that is being stocked up in the closet" but instead as survival fuel that is hoarded to meet capital requirments.
I could be wrong but that's how i see it now.
I don't see any new "bubble's being created". The biggest potential i see for a "recovery" ( or stop to the potentially free falling economy)
is a wide spread gov't investment in the infrastructure of this country as well as in a very aggressive alternative energy infrastructure plan
implemented. Both could serve to fill some of the employment void's left from the coming job losses. I think obama and congress may be allowed to be
aggressive on this front
Right now we have deflation and this is taking root in the economy, the best way to avoid this is very debateable and the only remedy in monetary
policy maybe to merly delay it's occurence thru more and more reckless bubble's and then on it's eve, try to convince the investor class that it
won' be allowed to happen here. although after it does i think history show's a one time devaluation also makes it easier (a political decison
chosen to pay off any public liablities (medicare/S. security with cheap/worthelss $) and get out of the deflationary spiral as well as inflate real
asset prices again (that the wealthy elite hold)
Regarding public debt, some country's also have historically allowed a debt forgiveness /jubilee as well which brings down public debt to a level
that would allow them to take on new loans which could get the economy moving again. Regarding Gov't debt, keeping intrest rates arificially low on
debt (via intrest rate derviatives) and having country's dependent on your consumer (japan , china) are great ways to continue to keep the intrest
rate burden on the gov't debt at a serviceable level for longer than it otherwise should(not to mention having petro dollar revenue's recycled into
your gov't debt) and when that is falling off due to (lower oil $) the political leverage wil be used to "entice" citizens to place there 401k's
in a position which fill the void in demand for gov't debt to keep the intrest payment's on gov't debt serviceable. wether the international debt
(gov't intrest rates can be kept down) or the public debt obligations hit the fan first may determine what policy's of (1 time devaluation) debt
forgiveness or default may be used and *in what order*.
I don't think many foreign country's are under the influence that the U.S govt is going to pay them back anyway, one group (OPEC) seems happy to
keep investing in gov't debt so long as the u.s protects them militarily (while they price oil $), the other group China, japan seem to invest in
govt' debt merely to keep intrest rates down which helps keep U.S consumers able to buy more of there exports which are need to support there own
economy's. Due to this think it is possible for the bankers to potentially maintain there confidence game with paper and keep asset prices high by
first a one time devaluation of the currency (while foregin govt's continue to purchase the gov't debt (although this choice would be most likely in
the case of a debt forgiveness for the american public) because then the foreign gov't buying u.s gov't debt may think that the u.s consumers would
still be capable to support the foreign country's export markets.........phewwwwwwwwwww
central bank Traditional reflationary measure's can't be used when citizens are in tremendous debt, losing there jobs, and company's are dealing
with the subsequent fall in earnings with many facing bankruptcy as the walmarts survive and especially as financial institutions are heavily
deleveraging from the prior credit expansion. All at the same time a dervivative monster was created in a ponzi scheme which *likely IMO* also serves
to keep intrest rate's and gold prices down so that the confidence game in paper currency can be continued thru connected banks like JP morgan and
Detushe bank in particular. A one time revaluation of the dollar will at some point likely be required to get us out of the deflationary spiral (and
monetize the debt) public and possible gov't debt. If foreign country's don't support the gov't bond market in the face of a large devaluation
then perhaps a default on foreign debt will occur. I see this coming to head in a couple years as the deflationary recession deepends into a
depression and the debt's become relatively larger due to deflation.
[edit on 10-11-2008 by cpdaman]
[edit on 10-11-2008 by cpdaman]