It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
APPENDIX.
THE REAL IDEOLOGICAL ROOT OF TERRORISM: DARWINISM AND MATERIALISM.
Most people think the theory of evolution was first proposed by Charles Darwin, and rests on scientific evidence, observations and experiments. However, the truth is that Darwin was not its originator, and neither does the theory rest on scientific proof. The theory consists of an adaptation to nature of the ancient dogma of materialist philosophy. Although it is not backed up by scientific discoveries, the theory is blindly supported in the name of materialist philosophy.
This fanaticism has resulted in all kinds of disasters. Together with the spread of Darwinism and the materialist philosophy it supports, the answer to the question "What is a human being?" has changed. People who used to answer: "God creates human beings and they have to live according to the beautiful morality He teaches", have now begun to think that "Man came into being by chance, and is an animal who developed by means of the fight for survival." There is a heavy price to pay for this great deception. Violent ideologies such as racism, fascism and communism, and many other barbaric world views based on conflict have all drawn strength from this deception....
Darwin set out with one basic premise when developing his theory: "The development of living things depends on the fight for survival. The strong win the struggle.The weak are condemned to defeat and oblivion." (Darwin never said this)
Furthermore, Darwin proposed that the "fight for survival" also applied between human racial groups. According to that fantastical claim, "favoured races" were victorious in the struggle. Favoured races, in Darwin's view, were white Europeans. African or Asian races had lagged behind in the struggle for survival. Darwin went further, and suggested that these races would soon lose the "struggle for survival" entirely, and thus disappear.(Darwin never said this either)
That the Nazis were influenced by Darwinism is a fact that almost all historians who are expert in the matter accept. The historian Hickman describes Darwinism's influence on Hitler as follows: (Hitler) was a firm believer and preacher of evolution. (More lies.Quote from Mein Kampf:
The fox remains always a fox,the goose remains a goose,and the tiger will retain the character of a tiger.
As we have so far seen, Darwinism is at the root of various ideologies of violence that have spelled disaster to mankind in the 20th century. The fundamental concept behind this understanding and method is "fighting whoever is not one of us."
For this reason, the root of the terrorism that plagues our planet is not any of the divine religions, but in atheism, and the expression of atheism in our times: "Darwinism" and "materialism."
FOSSIL SKULLS.
BLOW FROM FOSSIL SKULLS TO DARWINISM.
In the face of the disappointment caused by the fossil record and the lack of any evidence, evolutionists could only re-arrange the fake skulls several times and make speculations about skulls which have been documented to be counterfeits. However, researches made on the skulls of apes, as well as other living beings and different human races that lived in the past, revealed that these living beings have had existed with all the features they had and have not changed throughout history.
This means that living beings have not undergone any process of evolution, and have all been created by the All-Mighty God....
Darwinists claim that the imitative capability of apes is evidence for their allegation that apes evolved into humans. True, apes are capable of imitating the gestures and behaviors they see. When trained to do so, they can differentiate the shapes and colors of objects, and react intelligently to stimuli. However, this does not mean that they evolved into humans over the course of time. If such was the case, then all the animal species known to be intelligent—dogs, cats, horses—should be expected to evolve into humans gradually.
It is amazing to watch people with academic careers seriously trying to explain these unreasonable claims, by embellishing them with scientific terms and Latin words. No matter how the apes develop their mental capabilities and manual skills, or imitate what they see around them, this would not some day make them humans. Apes have always been apes, and will always remain so. And no matter how hard evolutionists may argue otherwise, the truth is evident: Man has come into existence not through any evolutionary process but has been created by God, with the intelligence, consciousness and conscience God has given him.(I'm guessing he either doesn't know what 'common ancestry means or he's deliberatly ignoring it)
“Lucy” is the name given to the fossil discovered by anthropologist Donald Johanson in 1974. Many evolutionists claimed that Lucy was the transitional form between the humans and their so-called hominid ancestors. However further analysis on this fossil revealed that Lucy is only the member of an extinct ape species, known as Australopithecus. The brain size of the Australopithecus is similar to chimpanzees. Many other characteristics—such as details in their skulls, the closeness of their eyes, their sharp molar teeth, their mandibular structure, their long arms and short legs—constitute evidence that these creatures were no different from today’s chimpanzees. Even the pelvis is similar to that of chimpanzees. (Like a chimpanzee,Lucy had a small brain,long,dangly arms,short legs and a cone-shaped thorax with a large belly.But the structure of her knee and pelvis show that she routinely walked upright on two legs,like us.This form of locomotion,known as 'bipedalism',is the single most important difference between humans and apes,placing Lucy firmly within the human family."Bipedalism is the most distinctive,apparently earliest,defining characteristic of humans," says Johanson,now director of the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Darwinists have no answer as to why bears have not decided to become bipedal on a given day, or why a fox has not been evolved into a skilled professor by developing its intelligence, or why a panda has not become a painter who creates impressive works of art. The subject of evolution has been depicted with examples and logics that even children could easily dismiss, simply to proclaim the inconceivable irrationality of Darwinism. Darwinism is presented as if it were a scientific theory, but is in fact an inconceivably irrational ideology.
As you shall see, Darwinism is the biggest scandal in history, founded entirely on lies and fraud and on irrational and illogical claims. The entire world will witness the final collapse of Darwinism in the 21st century.
CONCLUSION: EVOLUTION IS A DECEIT.
The theory of evolution is a theory that fails at the very first step. The reason is that evolutionists are unable to explain even the formation of a single protein. Neither the laws of probability nor the laws of physics and chemistry offer any chance for the fortuitous formation of life.
Does it sound logical or reasonable when not even a single chance-formed protein can exist, that millions of such proteins combined in an order to produce the cell of a living thing; and that billions of cells managed to form and then came together by chance to produce living things; and that from them generated fish; and that those that passed to land turned into reptiles, birds, and that this is how all the millions of different species on earth were formed?
There are many species in the world that resemble one another. For instance, there may be many living beings resembling a horse or a cat and many insects may look like one another. These similarities do not surprise anyone.
The superficial similarities between man and ape somehow attract too much attention. This interest sometimes goes so far as to make some people believe the false thesis of evolution. As a matter of fact, the superficial similarities between men and apes do signify nothing. The rhinoceros beetle and the rhinoceros also share certain superficial resemblances but it would be ludicrous to seek to establish some kind of an evolutionary link between these two creatures, one being an insect and the other a mammal, on the grounds of that resemblance.
There is a very big difference between man and ape regardless of a mere outward resemblance. An ape is an animal and is no different from a horse or a dog considering its level of consciousness. Yet man is a conscious, strong-willed being that can think, talk, understand, decide, and judge. All of these features are the functions of the soul that man possesses. The soul is the most important difference that interposes a huge gap between man and other creatures. No physical similarity can close this gap between man and any other living being. In nature, the only living thing that has a soul is man....
www.harunyahya.com...
[edit on 6-11-2008 by jakyll]
Does it seem logical to you, then, for highly trained researchers who crudely mimic systems in nature to solve difficult engineering problems to attribute the genius of devising the original idea to unintelligent evolution? If the copy requires an intelligent designer, what about the original? Really, who deserves more credit, the master artist or the student who imitates his technique?
Originally posted by jakyll
plenty of and laugh out loud moments.
but mommy i want a pony could be considered an enviromental factor ..
The theory consists of an adaptation to nature of the ancient dogma of materialist philosophy.
yes by thousands of scientists who all want ponies
Although it is not backed up by scientific discoveries, the theory is blindly supported in the name of materialist philosophy.
wow with the removal of anything Evolution related we find the reasons for the crusades witch burning and numerous historical events, could it be Darwin wasnt responsible for the numerous crusades and colonialism that happened before he was born?
"God creates human beings and they have to live according to the beautiful morality He teaches",*snip* There is a heavy price to pay for this great deception. Violent ideologies such as racism, fascism *SNIP*, and many other barbaric world views based on conflict have all drawn strength from this deception....
expert in what matter? the history of mongolian basket weaving? he also believed god told him to kill the jews becasue they killed jesus.. this seems a more workable explenation for his actions then i read a book and figured id try it out and see what happens
That the Nazis were influenced by Darwinism is a fact that almost all historians who are expert in the matter accept.
wow jesus and muhammed were evolutionists 2000 and 1500 years before Darwin was born
As we have so far seen, Darwinism is at the root of various ideologies of violence that have spelled disaster to mankind in the 20th century. The fundamental concept behind this understanding and method is "fighting whoever is not one of us."
so umm nothing to do with god saying burn down thier temples and kill the unbelievers in my name then? despite him repeating the message of love and cuddleyness several times
For this reason, the root of the terrorism that plagues our planet is not any of the divine religions, but in atheism, and the expression of atheism in our times: "Darwinism" and "materialism."
up and down the west back hammas carry out thier call to arms and action "Darwin achbar" -_-
And when we look at the present day, we see that all the members of terrorist organizations -- even those that portray themselves as Muslim organizations -- are Darwinists, atheists.
you aint kidding lol, only read the first one and felt the need to point an mock
Originally posted by jakyll
My biggest argument with creationism are those creationists who have to tell downright lies about Darwin and have to manipulate evolution as has been done in the Atlas of Creation.
If their theory of God created all is so sound then they shouldn't have to stoop to such levels.
this guy is special though and another one thats done jail time for fraud, did you know he has had richarddawkins.net banned in turkey because they dont say nice things about him
Originally posted by jakyll
noobfun.
I know.Its like they're not even trying anymore.lol.
Maybe their hoping that if they say it enough times it'll become true.