These pictures are friggin awsome. My vote is on it being "aurora-like" I guess is the way to put it. With the fox news teaser that came out regarding a pulse/jet powered craft capable of mach 10 i'd have to lean more towards 'black' projects from the US gubbernment than any ET technologies.....

Still the similarities are pretty striking. Reminded me the most of these pics from the Belgium triangle sightings.







We're planning a trip out to groom next spring some time. Hopefully our luck is as good! Cool stuff.

---

---

Originally posted by spitefulgod
It definitely ain't CGI the motion blur and AA aren't "perfect" enough to be CGI.

No, these images are CGI.

There is no motion blur, and the Anti-Aliasing on the first image sucks. The edge of the object is to sharp, and the sharpness doesn't match the rest of the image. The pixels of the edge have to much step to them. They should have some blur.

Depth perception is also missing. The focal length seems to be non-existent for the object, but existent for the rest of the images.

This is definitely CGI, and I bet you all the money in the world the OP will not respond to my request to see the original images straight from the camera. Right now the EXIF data is stripped from the images to hide it.

I'm almost certain this is a HOAX.

You people shouldn't believe images until you see where they are from. In this case, a random guy with pictures hosted on Flickr that don't have EXIF data, is very suspicious, it is not a good source.

Flickr was also the place the C2C Drone started.

Anyway,
These images don't look right. I think you all should ask the OP for the original images from the camera.

I think this should be labeled a hoax unless and until the OP returns with the full size images with EXIF data. Also, hoax or not, this is not nor ever will be an F-117. I wonder at the knowledge of aircraft of anyone who has seen the blowups and still claims this.

I am so glad this was posted and a mate saw it and told me about this place. That's the thing we saw from the drilling platform while we were moving it in September 2007. I ran to get my camera but the boss said no and then he got the pic which didn't show much but a black smoosh from behind. There was no contrail and no sound. It crossed over us and was out of sight in about 30 seconds moving from West to East over the North Sea.

Awesome. It's the exact same bird. It's big.

I am not sure why the images are only 2 megapixels instead of 7. I used my cousin's camera to take these and I had him put the pics on a cd for me. I then took the cd home with me and I took the images off of it. They should be exactly like they were on the cd. Thank you once again for all of you replies!

Maybe just maybe its this?





Look similar ish though I know nothing about planes and latest jets etc :-)

Elf

I heard no sonic boom so the plane must have stayed subsonic. Oh and 1 more thing, I did some reading today to try and figure out for myself what I took a picture of. I looked at some of the "black triangle" UFOs and this seems to be very similar, especially because of the lights on the plane's belly.

These pictures show something that is strikingly similar to the UFO seen over Illinois by a bunch of police and civillians. There was a UFO tv show recently about it, where an independant company took witness statements and made a recreation of what they had seen.

BUT...... when you look closely at the pics of this thing, it looks fake. And add to that, the person who supposedly took the pics wont come clean with an original photo, or even a good excuse for not having it!

My Dad used to tell me, "if it sounds to good to be true, it probably is." I've tested that to the best of my ability since childhood and it has always been proven true for me.

Sorry folks, but I think we're all looking at a fake!

ok, i looked at the photo's, the 1st one looked like a very aerodynamic UFO, the 2nd one kinda looked the same but with a shift tword the front. At first it looked like a stealth bomber, but i zoomed in and it wasn't