posted on Nov, 7 2008 @ 05:13 PM
Originally posted by spitefulgod
It definitely ain't CGI the motion blur and AA aren't "perfect" enough to be CGI.
No, these images are CGI.
There is no motion blur, and the Anti-Aliasing on the first image sucks. The edge of the object is to sharp, and the sharpness doesn't match the rest
of the image. The pixels of the edge have to much step to them. They should have some blur.
Depth perception is also missing. The focal length seems to be non-existent for the object, but existent for the rest of the images.
This is definitely CGI, and I bet you all the money in the world the OP will not respond to my request to see the original images straight from the
camera. Right now the EXIF data is stripped from the images to hide it.
I'm almost certain this is a HOAX.
You people shouldn't believe images until you see where they are from. In this case, a random guy with pictures hosted on Flickr that don't have
EXIF data, is very suspicious, it is not a good source.
Flickr was also the place the C2C Drone started.
These images don't look right. I think you all should ask the OP for the original images from the camera.