Is this a top secret plane?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 56 times


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 01:17 PM by METACOMET
The second pic is great. Again, can we get the original pic data so the experts can find out if it's legit or not?

I'm certainly no expert on aircraft or airframes, but isn't a scramjet a single thruster on the bottom of the airframe? This looks like it has 2 "conventional" engines on it, like an f-18 or something. If it were a scramjet, I would expect a single block protruding from the bottom. Maybe it is one of the supposed glided air vehicles?

Aurora Scramjet
Scramjet
Scramjet

Questions to OP...
Can we get the original 7MP pics, pretty please?
Was it coming or going or just cruising? What direction was it heading? Do you think it was coming from Dryden?
Were there any other aircraft in the area?
What did it sound like?
Did you see a wind shield or cockpit?
You said it was smaller than an f-16. In your opinion, was it unmanned?

Edit to add: What is this at nellis, could it be? 34*57'00.86N 117*53'05.72W

[edit on 7-11-2008 by METACOMET]


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 02:15 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by IronMan



cool finally summit new to look at and not summit everyone goes ufo hoax, with todays tech out there it must be so hard to work out wot is real and wot is cgi, great photos hope we see more now.


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 02:43 PM by harrytuttle
One thing I haven't seen anyone mention here is the atmospheric haze present in the second photograph. Judging by the shear lack of atmospheric haze between the aircraft and the photographer, we can conclude that the craft is relatively close to the photographer. Thus, the aircraft is actually quite small suggesting it is a UAV of some X type.

Compare the haze between the foreground mountain and the background mountain. Then look at the aircraft - no haze. Being that the aircraft is black, if there were haze we would see that clearly.

So, my conclusion is that the aircraft is a small UAV of some experimental type. Which in the end, is completely plausible. The US Airforce has stated many times that the future of aircraft is with the unmanned type, and being that Area 51 is an aircraft testing facility, it all makes sense.




[edit on 7-11-2008 by harrytuttle]

[edit on 7-11-2008 by harrytuttle]

[edit on 7-11-2008 by harrytuttle]



reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 03:15 PM by Mondogiwa
reply to post by harrytuttle



Excellent deductive reasoning, both by you and the British concept.
I know a member of the RAF who is currently stationed in Ft. Worth, Texas as part of an exchange and evaluation program involving the JSF..he mentioned a thing or two about just such a test and evaluation program regarding UAV's and the evolution of a smaller more 'hive minded' type of craft that is being developed by both countries.

Anyway, looks like for the time being we will have to discuss this aircraft project within the UFO forum until it is moved....very interesting photos. I must say though, that you could really interpret the craft as quite a few different aircraft if you were not persuaded or disuaded in any way.
Does anybody know the date of the photos yet?

Peace,
Mondo

[edit on 7-11-2008 by Mondogiwa]


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 03:28 PM by the seeker_713g
reply to post by shaolin_dragon

SD, the shape in the photo you posted is not correct; op pic shows upswept stabilator type wing tips, yours does not, therefore IMO it isn't the same craft. Also yours shows a wider cross-section and appears to be shorter in length.




seeker


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 03:37 PM by the seeker_713g
reply to post by Mondogiwa


According to the write up on Flickr, the photos were taken in August of this year.

After zooming in on both photos, in #1 the craft is heading away from the camera at a 11 o'clock angle; in #2 it is pointed at 3 o'clock moving almost parrallel to the camera.



seeker


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 03:54 PM by Helmkat
reply to post by the seeker_713g



AND according to Flickr this pic was taken with a 7 meg camera (with a 2 meg photo posted) AND the pic has been touched at least once AND the files showing if the picture has been manipulated more have been purposely removed.

I want this to be real to but imho the OP -must-answer these questions.

[edit on 7-11-2008 by Helmkat]

[edit on 7-11-2008 by Helmkat]


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 04:01 PM by Shugo
reply to post by oconnection



I'd be somewhat interested in that as well, as I observe the image closer, I am noting atmospheric distortion in the background, but for some odd reason, there's nothing distorting the plane at all. Digi cam though...what if.

[edit on 7.11.2008 by Shugo]


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 04:07 PM by the seeker_713g
reply to post by Helmkat

oh, most definitely would like to see his answers and the raw data files, but this was his first day/post here, so, who knows? May be the last we ever see of the op.




seeker
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 14 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 186 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 11 hours ago, 102 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 71 replies