AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Is this a top secret plane?


<<  11    12    13    14    15  >>



reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 01:12 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by Canada_EH
White sands is a big place


White Sands? White Sand is no where near Area 51 WTF?

White Sands is in New Mexico
www.wsmr.army.mil...

Area 51 is in Nevada



[edit on 26-11-2008 by zorgon]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 01:30 PM by Shadowhawk


In one of the original photos, Whitesides Hill is clearly visible on the right side of the image. It has a somewhat pointy peak but the white feature that gives it the name is not visible from this angle. I still find the vehicle highly suspect (it looks like an R/C model) but at least we know the picture was taken overlooking Tikaboo Valley, Nevada, and pointing in the general direction of Groom Lake.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 02:00 PM by Canada_EH


reply to post by zorgon



Its was a joke Zorgon. I'm well aware and it was sorta joking jab at location.

On top of that everything looks the same out there anyways

[edit on 26-11-2008 by Canada_EH]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 02:08 PM by Canada_EH


reply to post by Implosion


Umm what code tags?
Also yes this works on any jpegs. Program is called HexEdit that i use.
And yes I'll repeat again no this doesn't prove a fake but its a strong mark against it.
But no one has done much to prove its real. The strongest thing that has come up is the background and trying to figure it out.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 02:10 PM by Implosion


Originally posted by Canada_EH
reply to post by Implosion


Umm what code tags?



Like quote tags, but instead of "quote" type "code".

I think so anyway, been a while since I used BBCode.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 02:15 PM by Canada_EH


Oh sure I can try it that way to fix the issue thanks. Didn't understand thats what you where referring to. Its already posted as visible in the photo account but doesn't hurt to show it again.

ˇÿˇ‡


And thats the result. So it doesn't fix it what ever the issue is. The image is still there for people to see hex screen shot.


[edit on 26-11-2008 by Canada_EH]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 02:18 PM by Implosion


Originally posted by Canada_EH
Oh sure I can try it that way to fix the issue thanks. Didn't understand thats what you where referring to. Its already posted as visible in the photo account but doesn't hurt to show it again.

ˇÿˇ‡


And thats the result. So it doesn't fix it what ever the issue is. The image is still there for people to see hex screen shot.


[edit on 26-11-2008 by Canada_EH]


Oh well, worth a try.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 10:05 AM by AlienCarnage


Nevermind. Answered my own question, missed someone elses posting.

[edit on 11/28/2008 by AlienCarnage]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:39 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by Canada_EH
Its was a joke Zorgon. I'm well aware and it was sorta joking jab at location.
On top of that everything looks the same out there anyways



AH Must be that weird CANADIAN humour Eh? :p

But my point was I asked the OP where he took the photo. While it may all look the same to a crazy Cannuck, to me it doesn't. I know the hills around the neighborhood. The fact I cannot get an answer on the location speaks louder than whether the photo is real or not . Surely he can point to a map and say "I was here"



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:45 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by Implosion

Like quote tags, but instead of "quote" type "code".
I think so anyway, been a while since I used BBCode.


I think what you want is unicode. ATS is one of the few boards that has set up the Unicode feature...

www.joelonsoftware.com...

Code for Pluto..

U+2647

Theta

U+952

www.ssec.wisc.edu...



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:46 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by Implosion

Like quote tags, but instead of "quote" type "code".
I think so anyway, been a while since I used BBCode.


I think what you want is unicode. ATS is one of the few boards that has set up the Unicode feature...

www.joelonsoftware.com...

PHI... & # 936 (Leave out spaces)

Ψ

Pluto... & # 9799



tlt.its.psu.edu...

www.ssec.wisc.edu...

☿ ♀ ♁ ♂ ♃ ♄ ♅ ♆ ♇

Works on all the math symbols for equations as well but its a lot of work

√ ∛ ∜

Wonder if it works on CHESS..

♙♚♛♜♝♞


WOO HOO it does



DINGBATS anyone?

✠ ✡ ❁ ❄ ➑


Hey don't mind me Just found a new toy



...---...


[edit on 28-11-2008 by zorgon]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 12:51 AM by ALLis0NE


I think he is talking about code tags? #

(code) (/code)

 
function kill(hoax)
{
hoax.thread.offsubject = true
hoax.exif.data = false
hoax.dead = true
}
kill(thisthread);


[edit on 2-12-2008 by ALLis0NE]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 07:35 AM by shasa


my two cents go on :

aereodynamic low altitude tests of the scramjet testbed ( the hypersonic plane launched "publically" a few years go on top of a pegasus missile... this looks bigger, perhaps a proof of concept model ...

or possibly a blended wing plane ( but looking at the pictures i'm more for #1 option)

definetly not f117, not a trianglar ufo kid of craft since it is triangular but two sides are obviously longer than the other giving it the so called "aurora" look.

Interesting pictures, not cgi in my opinion



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 12:32 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by ALLis0NE
kill(thisthread);


So who is paying you to push killing this thread?




   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 07:00 PM by Rumor-Buster


I've said it before and I'll say it again. This is a hoax. It has no visible propulsion system, the fin on one side and not the other makes it look similar to an X-38, and, oh yeah, zooming back a bit, yes, Project Aurora is a classified project, involving a prototype bomber currently located at A53, in Virginia. The S does not stand for AntiSubmarine. The topic is interesting, but I don't believe it's the subject for debate about whether it is an F-117 or UAV.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 09:37 PM by Zaphod58


reply to post by Rumor-Buster



So instead of using somewhere like Tonopah or Area 51 they're going to test an ultra top secret aircraft in Virginia. Sure, makes perfect sense to me. Interesting how there isn't even a rumor of an Area 53 too. If you're going to test something this top secret, the LAST place you would test it would be Virginia. Too many chances of being seen, when there are too many wide open less populated areas that could be used.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 09:40 PM by SpartanKingLeonidas


reply to post by ampaf707



It's the side-profile of the F-117 Nighthawk. You can see the cockpit sticking up in the middle of it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 09:42 PM by Zaphod58


We've pretty much established that hoax or not, its definitely NOT an F-117 at any angle.



   copyright & usage 


<<  11    12    13    14    15  >>





























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.012 seconds
Page processed in 0.219 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.