Originally posted by postings
Careful there, Bush went bankrupt (if memory serves) trying to run his own oil business. If not bankrupt, he had some serious financial difficulties with it. Does he have more experience? Maybe . . . Is his experience? Questionable. Personally I think that the fact that Kerry doesn't have any connections (that I know of) to oil indicates that he would be a better president. Maybe he woudn't be as much a slave to those interests. I wonder what other interests he would be a slave of?
-P

I'm really not sure how much we need to rely on a President's background. Many of them have been governors. There's been an actor and a peanut farmer.
I think the advisors he picks are far more valuable to a President.

As far as Kerry, I would say a slave of ketchup and hair pieces

We've lost 4 years of focus on alternate fuel innovation and application by not having Gore as president.
The symbiotic relationship of innovation/need/committment that will be prought to bear in the Kerry white house on this issue is reason enought to vote for him. Being the world leader in applicable alternate energy tech will add millions of jobs as well as cementing or perch position.

How is that no one has mentioned that Kerry's plan will have virtually NO effect on current gas prices?



seekerof