It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by noobfun
actually no
i cant discuss main stream christianity with you as you dont follow or understand its working(you may but your discussing your personal religeon)
in the same way i dont follow or understand your own version so cant discuss it with you, which is why you percive im ignoring what your saying, im not i just dont have an understanding of what it is you beleive strong enough to debate it
in the same way we are having difficulty here because i am discussing mainstream while your discussing your own
your a programmer and ive done some so if we were discussing programing languages im talking about C and your talking about VB or python they arnt compatible in the discussion unless we are comparing merits and draw backs of both languages
the reson you get flak from both sides is your discussing VB in a debate about C and its plus and draw back features
Originally posted by badmedia
And there are numerous times where he says those who believe and accept him will follow the path. And there are numerious times where it points out that people will do things in his name, but are actually working in sin.
And I prove and show that both of these things are true. Just look at how the "Christian right" were all in favor of going to war, and not even in real defense of themselves. Things which go against what Jesus said. They support the killing of other people, and judging them etc. If you will know people by their fruits, then I know these peoples fruits are rotten.
And all the christians of today who also follow the symbolism and institutions of today rather than the teachings are fated to the same thing. And hell is not eternal, it's only the result of what you have sowed. You can at anytime pull yourself up out of there. We are in a hell now of my/our own making, unless you suggest this heaven.
Because what parent punishes their child for eternity? I do not punish my kids to hurt them. I punish them to teach them a lesson. If they do not lear the lesson, then I will have to punish them more.
You mean the roman's present in the land, who were the rulers and the authority which he was against? Do you really think he is picking them out because they are simply romans, or because all the romans there were the people who ruled over them?
unfortunatley you have, you may not be aware of it but you have.
I have yet to change the meaning of what is said. You have only claimed I did, and that I moved the goal posts because I added in the verses between and proceeding what you quoted.
These are all just opinions. I have already shown where and why you were wrong in your claims.
Originally posted by calihan123
[look at the mayan culture. look at the egyptians. they had hyroglyphics of monsters and aliens... these things have been around just as long if not longer than the bible.
these are no modern day tales
good start here yes its similar but not quite the same as between different religeons
Originally posted by badmedia
Between programming languages, the only thing that really changes is the syntax and structure. The actual logic's involved for the most part are the same between all languages.
good over view but your missing factors here, this is why im saying you are not a christian your belief could be classed as many things but not christianity
And I see religion and such in that same light. Once you understand the logic(philosophy) behind them, then the rest comes naturally. And any decent programmer is going to follow that logic and see where it leads.
but if its an historical actual real moment in history and time the people and events are the action, your seeing the war but not the people fighting it and the things and tactics they are doing/using to play out the war
And anyone who is actually paying attention to what is going on is going to look at the actions rather than the images/people/events gonig on, as that is where the logic/philosophy behind the actions is.
no not fell apart yet
You and it seems the majority of people who want to dismiss the bible only want to argue against the mainstream version. As soon as I come in talking about what Jesus actually said and meant - in a way which btw, is logical and can be understood, you're arguments seem to fall apart.
the arrogance i dont know if i should laugh, cry or cry with laughter
As soon as I come in talking about what Jesus actually said and meant
Originally posted by calihan123
I don't get it...
billions of people on this earth believe in the bible. in god. in jesus. many other religions believe similar stories that vary.
these people believe it so much, they literally argue and argue and argue that its the truth until they cant breathe.
so my question is this. why is it so easy for everyone to believe the insane stories of the bible, these larger than life stories that in modern day would never ever seem to happen....
yet not many people believe in ghosts?
not many people believe in aliens?
not many people believe in other creatures such as bigfoot and chupacabra?
If we can believe the outrageous claims made in the bible, but we cant even believe a little ghost story...
what kind of hypocrites does that make us?
[edit on 6-11-2008 by calihan123]
Originally posted by Gorman91
Why does one have to believe it all?
Does a restaurant require you to eat their whole dish?
If I find something I disagree with, I will not agree with it and screw you if you tell me otherwise.
Originally posted by noobfun
hahaha yes yes he does but what he really meant by that was he loved camels and terrapons and they were all going to heaven with a free pass (if your gonna treat it all as a parable then so shall i)
and guess what some of the christian left wanted to go too, and some of the none christian left and none christian right wanted to go too, this doesnt prove your right it just proves some people wanted to go to war
and it also doesnt prove your version of faith is correct either, the earth goes round the sun does not prove that evolution is correct or that toast will always land butter side down when dropped from sufficient height it just proves the earth goes around the sun
i suggest it is neither were in the middle fo the two if christainity and the bible are to be believed
again go read the bible jesus clearly states thrown in to the fires of hell for eternity and once your in there there is no comming back
same with genesis all women are punished for the actions of 1 woman, all men are punished for the actions of 1 man
all snakes are made to wriggle around on thier bellies like they did anyway .... ... erm ... .. becasue of the actions of 1 snake
all donkeys carry a cross on thier shoulders for the actions of 1 donkey
its a trend, one for all and all for one takes an interesting twist suddenly
it was the gentiles and samaritans Matthew 10:5-6 although you will probabily impose some external meaning onto it
which yes does cover the romans but also covers you and me i can say with reasonable certainty you me and practically every christian of the last 2000 years never should have heard the message of jesus
unfortunatley you have, you may not be aware of it but you have.
you are adding external context "jesus said this becasue he was talking to ... " you are reading and analysing the bible as a parable or play your looking for the message within the story
but it is a historical account of the life of jesus which means it doesnt have extra hidden essoteric meaning, for it to have that it would have to be fictional not factual which would mean jesus didnt do or say those things
so which is it? a real account or a parable?
parable n. A simple story illustrating a moral or religious lesson.
these are just oppinions as are yours, unfortuantley you havent shown anything except the way you view the bible
which is in a polar opposite to how christainity views it, how historians views it, how the average person on thew street views it, how islam views it, how athiests view it
now im not gonan fall into the they all believe so you must be wrong,
but i will ask how it is yours is the right view when you havnt studdied the bible in the context it was written, have less understanding about its history and traditions and dont have a historical line of writings and research back to the creation of the bible and the life of jesus him self
Originally posted by noobfun
good start here yes its similar but not quite the same as between different religeons
good over view but your missing factors here, this is why im saying you are not a christian your belief could be classed as many things but not christianity
if the only language you know is C and then a VB compiler is opened infront of you and your told to make a a certain program with it you cant just go at it becasue you dont understand the object orientated aspect, its going to take time and explaoration and a bit of trial and error to get a grasp of it
right now you understand C(your own faith) and you are trying to force it(VB compiler) to work with C code and no VB objects, you dont understand the object orientated nature of the programming language you dont understand all those different objects you can add from the list on the right or how to add code within them but declaring that VB is wrong and you are right and it must use the same text only structure of C becasue you understand that
you understand C but your insiting your a VB programmer by demanding VB work exactly the same in every detail as C
you understand your faith but your insiting your a christian by demanding it is what you want it to be not by you doing and becomeing what it demands its followers to be, it was here first it gets to make the rules
but if its an historical actual real moment in history and time the people and events are the action, your seeing the war but not the people fighting it and the things and tactics they are doing/using to play out the war
your saying Alexander won against Darius at Gaugamela becasue he was alexander the great, your ignoring the fact they were massivley outnumbered, the tactics he initially employed the way he cahnged his tactics to counter Darius's troops, how parmenion's troops had to hold and fight almost the point of collapse, how Alexander ignored this to the last second to go after his personal goal
your seeing only an overview and in many cases its an overview you your self have created
Originally posted by prototism
You are absolutely right. Popular opinion is whatever the majority of the population has said, says it is, and says will be.
I often think that, assuming alternate realities exist, we in this reality simply put more weight on the belief of God and Jesus, etc. But whats to say that in alternate realities/timelines, weight isn't put on the things we scoff at?
From that we can ask, who is right? Does "right and wrong" (not in the moral sense) even really exist?
again i ask were you there? what evidence have you? why do you know better?
and that is the entire point in what Jesus was saying about people who do things in his name but do not follow what he taught, and their hearts are far from his.
becasue the bible and christianity is very clear what hell is, badmediaism follows a different path
Btw, what makes you think you aren't in a form of hell already?
You will have to post verses. Sorry, not going to respond to your claims of what it says, especially given your history of taking things out of context.
cant read the bible properly cant read a reply properly either it seems ........
As I already told you, I did not get the message from Jesus, I got it from source. .
I could care less if Jesus was real or the history of it. It doesn't matter to me at all. What I do care about is the understandings contained within. The understandings given when you understand what a parable is in the first place. But as the bible says Jesus spoke in parables, then obvious it can be both, and is not a dualistic switch of 1 or the other. I don't know, I wasn't alive back then that I can remember and only have text to go on.
Anyway, this is basically what turned me towards the bible. It was when I realized the truth is universal and the idols and story only change with the cultures, that the underlieing truth was universal that I started talking about the bible as something other than mind control.
If the things I say do not make logical sense, then point them out. But for some reason, you can't do that. All you can do is hold popular belief as being different than mine as a way of claiming I am wrong
And pretty much the rest of your post was a bunch of crap spewed out. Like was I there? Were you? All the things you accuse me of can be said of anyone of these times,
in this discusion im interested in the christian view of truth not the badmediast view of truth
to hold yours up above all others is as i said at the very least arogant and bordering dilusional
again i ask were you there? what evidence have you? why do you know better?
the fact you asked your self a few questions and formulated your own belief structure doesnt in anyway shape or form mean you got it right, from an historical view point of that time and early church writting your way way way off base
and the funny thing is they are all important biblical events and most of them hapen within a few sentences of each other, why do i beleive you dont have a clue about the bibles contents or meaning ... you keep showing you dont
cant read the bible properly cant read a reply properly either it seems ........
As I already told you, I did not get the message from Jesus, I got it from source. .
you couldnt care less if jesus was real or historical.... thansk for finally admiting your not a christian, to be one you have to beleive those very same things
Originally posted by noobfun
If the things I say do not make logical sense, then point them out. But for some reason, you can't do that. All you can do is hold popular belief as being different than mine as a way of claiming I am wrong
ok lets do that shall we
and if you were in india you would have found the truth of hindusim or bhuddism and in the middle east found the truth of islamic jesus, so your turth is bound to locality and not a global truth so as said logic got lost along the way if it was global you would value the quaran as highly as the bible and every other religeous text
for thousands of years man has worshiped literally thousand of gods, not one of those gods has been proven to exist
of these thousands of gods only a handful are today worshipped, gods are worshipped replaced and recycled into the new dieties of choice time and time again. as modern gods have failed to prove them selves they wil inevitably go the same way as they predocessors(infact islam is already doing this) they will be replaced recycled and reworshipped under a different name with a different face
people of all religeons claim to have a religeous experience a moment of ultimate clarity when they see the truth of god(only evr thier god of choice though), athiests and agnostics also describe similar moments of clarity and enlightenment but do not acredit them to any specific god or to a god at all
2 possabilities exist for this either
it is a natural part of the conciouse/unconcious mind that we as yet do not understand and its this naturaly action that is bieng attributed to some higher power wrongly, and with time the gods we have now will be pulled down recycled and replaced with other equally as silly gods (athiest - without faith)
or
this experience hints at a higher power that occasionally we tap into or become aware of, this higher power is not found in anyone of the worlds religeons specifically and the commonalaties of all religeon would suggest they are just a poor attempt to understand this higher power making all religeons equally bad at showing the truth, god is a power we as yet have little understanding of and no religeon is great enough to come close to encompassing its reality (agnostic-with faith)
we have written accounts leading back almost to chirsts death thanks to the early churches, were they there no can they read from sources that were there yes, can you, no
they have the historic high ground of how the bible was written/to be read
yes i whole heartedly agree you are not a typical christian as you are not a christian
Originally posted by badmedia
external? You were quoting things out of context, I was quoting the verse before and between the verses you quoted. A a parable is simply a story given to convey an understanding. But yet, in what you say the understanding isn't valid.
Not once have you yet to be able to show me where I am wrong. It's the same old story, over and over in this thread. And that is you accusing me of being wrong, based solely on the perception of Christianity by the mainstream. I openly and freely told you, and others that I am not your typical christian.
this is a comparative comment not and ad hominem
Have you completely forgotten what this thread is about? It was someone talking about how people change almost over night into belief and such.
You calling it "badmediast" is just a lame personal attack on your part. Why do you need to resort to Ad hominem attacks?
I've quoted it multiple times in this thread, it came directly out of the bible.
The bible says - seek and you will find. The way you seek is by asking questions. I did not just make stuff up in my head, I thought about things logically. *snip*Once I realized that, the rest just really fit right into place. I then started to see little bible quotes here and there, and started looking at the bible deeper, and for the first time it actually made sense.
ad hominim and unfounded ^_^
Skipping over your old tired arguments here a bit.
i have yet to take it out of context
If you know it so much better, then why did you start posting in this thread by taking things out of context?
ahh my bad i picked the wrong bit of the holy trinity .. does god and the holy spirit live in your head then? (sarcasm not an ad hominim)
The source I got it from was from god and the holy spirit. Just as the bible says will be done.
well based on the fact the word has alway meant none jewish people
And now you are saying that Christians, the people who follow Jesus are "gentiles" based on what the term meant for the time? Are you actually suggesting that only Jews can hear Jesus?
you have asked me to take your misreading and added external context as truth which would make that the factual way to read the bible
And where have I asked you to take anything as fact? All I have done is pointed out how you have taken things out of context, and provided meaning.
b12 fatty acids are good for memory maybe you should take a few (ad hominim ... ill build you some strawmen later and point those out too)
As I remember it, you were taking things out of context and asking everyone else to take that as fact.
but still you insit your a christian -_-
finally? I openly admit it, and tell people exactly that. Multiples I have told people that. The idol is not important to me, the message is
metaphors and parables are a good way to simplify or give a comparative understanding
A parable is designed to give understanding, bottom line. Most often the parables come as the result of 1 of the disciples asking for clarification on what he said while talking. Coincidence?
Originally posted by badmedia
It's pretty simple. The truth is universal, the idol(messenger) changes from culture to culture. The truth doesn't change, just the way it is convey'd. The major flaw in all religions is that they focus on the idol rather than the understandings. That would be the things they do in the idol or gods name.
Idols. False idols at that. And as they are all false idols, including the idol of Jesus they will continue to be replaced with new idols, because the idols were never the important thing to being with. Understanding however keeps evolving.
the point i made
Perception. In these moments of clarity or whatever, you experience things which aren't exactly describable in words, and have no real names. As such, you will look for the closest things you can find to try and convey what you've seen/understood.
here comes the im right the world is wrong argument again
As for the first part, that will only hold up until you realize the limited perception and start asking what consciousness is.
glad to see you lost your arrogance -_- when you found an imaginary friend (sarcastic ad hominim)
Our eyes take in light, which is then converted into electrical patterns. Those patterns travel to the back of the brain where they are converted again into the images/reality we see. Who is the viewer? I was once atheist, until I realized it was completely arrogant to make such assumptions based on a very limited perspective
well gee wizz guess we should all be glad your here then preachiung to us the global truth of the none idol while using your regional varient of the idolitry hand book to do it
As for the 2nd, as I have been trying to point out to you - The reason religion has been a poor attempt at showing the truth is because all the focus is put on the idol/messenger rather than the understandings that are trying to be shown.
no no it didnt the dark ages is somthing very very different i cant even be bothered to correct you anymore its getting that tedious the dark ages also had little to do with religeon(well it played a part but is not the casue for the dark ages)
Directly after the bible was compiled into what it is today, it lead to the dark ages. And these people have the historic high ground?
The common people weren't even allowed to own a bible.
i agree do you really beleive this stuff?
What nonsense.
Originally posted by noobfun
yes i whole heartedly agree you are not a typical christian as you are not a christian
muslims beleive in jesus too but they are not christians as they dont hold the tenats of christianity to be true, christians and muslims beleive in the abrahamic god but are not jews becasue they dont hold the jewish tenats to be correct
you beleive in jesus but do not hold the fundamental tennets of christainity to be true so there fore you are not a christian... theres a whole host of things you can beleive once you get in this group but your not even making it past security
as for out of context? i quote the verse you say your miss quoting it your not showing more of the text, i quote more of the text and it still shows the same you then call out of context and add extrenious content and meaning
the bible has its own context, jesus goes to temple heals a man, jesus leave people follow he talks to the people, some of the pharosei also followed one asks him a question, he answers question someone interupts jesus to alert him to the presence of mother and brother, he denies them saying that only his true followers shall be coinsidered family(and thereby saved)
that is the shortended version in context
this differs to what your trying to impose on it and then tell people is the truth of the bible