Fox News: Palin didn't know Africa was a continent, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 06:27 PM by ACEMANN
Originally posted by mopusvindictus
reply to
post by lee anoma



She wasn't bro, she was acting, screwing McCain over

I'll back it up in the future i'm so sure of it... she is one serious witch and... I don't blame her either

I remember reading in the first week how his staff wanted her to tow Mccains line and she had issue with that then a few days later "agreed to conform"

They tried to silence her, because of stance on abortion and g-d and other true conservative issues

and I live around the corner from McCain, I drink with these guys, they are sexist and I am certain they all told her to play a game

and LOL she sure did...

If people will believe she is THAT dumb and a person can't throw a few tantrums on purpose...fine, but I know better, I know a Smart womans malice, i'm divorced!!!!!

The Girl is Crafty Like Ice is Cold





This is EXACTLY what I have been thinking. For days I have been stumped as to why she had been so "moronic" after her initial appearance. Think about it:

When she walked out on that stage - and for the next few days, weeks, etc, the GOP was only talking about "SARAH!!" Everyone and I mean EVERYONE forgot about McCain. Its was only SARAH...

Then she got dumb. Had horrible interviews, etc. This stumped me: everything I had read & seen about her - and I had read & seen a lot - did NOT match up to the woman I was watching. Her winking and "hocky mom" stuff got old. How the F could a woman who fought tooth-and-nail to to get the Alaskan Gov. position stoop to winks and corny catch phrases AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL?? It didn't make sense. You might be able to get away with that in your home state - but you would have to be a serious "dee-da-dee" to think you could win OVER 50% of the population with that sh&t. I guess I'm not the only one who thought something was up.

And NO - I am not a sobbing McCain supporter. I am not surprised he lost. But what I am surprised at is that it seems his VP pick cost him the Presidency - on purpose.

great thread - this IS a conspiracy site right??

[edit on 6-11-2008 by ACEMANN]

[edit on 6-11-2008 by ACEMANN]

[edit on 6-11-2008 by ACEMANN]


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 08:34 PM by xpert11
reply to post by spacedoubt



Look after her comment about seeing Russia from where she lives even Fox news couldn't sugar coat her forever . Never the less this news clip does represent the blame game more then any post election post mortem .

To put it politely Palin was to insular and right wing even by American standards . McCain selection of Palin was a tactical victory that turned out to be a strategic defeat . McCain faced a choice he could either continue to appeal to moderates that he won over during the primary's or bring his party core supporter base to life . It was impossible for McCain to do both because the Republican supporter core supporter base has become disconnected with the rest of America .

Although I don't have any figures but I would wager that Palin wouldn't have appealed to urban votes outside of the likes of Texas . It would be like a rural(SP?) Kiwi farmer taking his rifle and campaigning amongst Latte drinkers in Auckland . It just wouldn't go down to well end of story .


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 09:04 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by xpert11



I wonder what she saw or heard that she might spill? She has no party loyalty. She made herself governor by exposing corruption in her wn party in Alaska. She needed to be thoroughly discredited before she might talk. The weapon of choice is FOX news.


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 09:05 PM by spacedoubt
reply to post by xpert11



Maybe so, xpert11.
But I took the Russia comment as nothing more than that it would serve to keep one mindful of a country that not so long ago, was considered enemy number one. And That when our airspace is crossed, that's where it happens.

But yes, it did expose her naivete, when dealing with a press that was well prepared to make fools of anyone who was not glazed-over with Obamaphilia.
Katie Couric had a field day with that one, and Sarah let her do it.

And now, Carl Cameron, who is NOT my favorite reporter (it's a Ron Paul thing)
Pulls this crap..

Palin's response:
That's kind of a small, evidently bitter type of person who would anonymously charge something foolish like that that I perhaps didn't know an answer to a question. So until I know who -- who is talking about it, I won't have a comment on false allegations.

Now that's a smart response, she's learning.

Here is what I really think.

News Corp. has posted some nasty losses this quarter.
And we know that "news" in it's current incarnation, is merely a product, looking for a niche. Bush, Fox's moneymaker for the last 8 years, is pretty much a non-entity now. Fox news is looking to expand it's viewer base, and will begin pimping itself to a more moderate crowd. It's a survival tactic.


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 09:38 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by spacedoubt


Spacedoubt, you're on the right track about Fox. It's actually, though, a little more transparent than that:
gawker.com...
Conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch, under the influence of young wife Wendi Deng, is now a huge Obama fan and rumored embarrassed by the boorish partisanship of O'Reilly and Fox News chief Roger Ailes.


and:
gawker.com...

When News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch decided to sit down for a rare, on-camera interview, it was of course with two reporters from his own media empire, Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher of the Wall Street Journal. In this clip from the Journal's D conference in Carlsbad, California, Murdoch explains how he thinks the Journal and Times will be competing aggressively with one another on all stories — business, political or otherwise — within just "a few months." He also rants about how it's "ridiculous" that an average of 8.3 editors looks at a typical WSJ story, inevitable expanding it beyond reason. "People don't have time for it — there's not a story that you can't get all the facts in (within) half the space." Also: Murdoch confirms he was involved in the Post's decision to switch its allegiance from Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama.


Money, (and the BIG BOSS,of course) still speak louder than words. Ah, the FREE press in America....or as that great philosopher Yakov Smirnoff says:
"American, vot a Country"


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 09:45 PM by xpert11
Originally posted by spacedoubt
But I took the Russia comment as nothing more than that it would serve to keep one mindful of a country that not so long ago, was considered enemy number one.


Fair point . I do find it hard to fathom her wording in that context . Unfortunately Palin reinforced much of the worlds impression or stereotypes of Americans. That is about all I can say without going off topic I have given my views on Russia elsewhere on ATS .

But yes, it did expose her naivete, when dealing with a press that was well prepared to make fools of anyone who was not glazed-over with Obamaphilia.


I can understand where your coming from the media has acted like a lynch mob during aspects of the NZ election campaign .
How could Palin have that kind of naivety after serving in any kind of political position little alone governor ?
Anybody who has held any kind of political office has en counted the workings of the media for the lack of a better description .



So until I know who -- who is talking about it, I won't have a comment on false allegations.


Well I cant say for sure that she made that specific comment about Africa . IMO given her comment about Russia it is likely that she made such a comment .

Now that's a smart response, she's learning.


To be polite once again I would say that you are being generous there . Unless Palin makes an effort to portray herself as being more moderate for a 2012 run she will only ever appeal to a relatively small fraction of voters in the US . Palin may be a good or great governor but she clearly isnt fit for the wider stage .

The long short of it all just about every MSM outlet has an agenda its just that Fox News does less do hide this fact then most outlets . The longer the Republican looks to the era Reagan era for solutions and care more about what someone does in the bedroom then real issues the longer they will be in the wildness .


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 10:17 PM by xpert11
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



Clearly I'm not a Palin fan but in fairness party loyalty is not the same thing same thing as being complacent in corruption or illegal practices . I'm not sure if Palin has actually genuinely cracked down on corruption in her home state or she has just taken token actions to suit her election plank . As I noted above the fact she may be a good governor doesnt mean she would make a suitable VP . IMO there is no conspiracy here rather just a set of circumstances that I have already outlined in this thread . I hesitate to call her a bad candidate because of the impossible situation the McCain camp found themselves in .

[edit on 6-11-2008 by xpert11]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Memorial day thoughts.
  Posted 2 days ago with 11 member flags
Global governance and the challenge to the American Constitution
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
Abraham Lincoln Filed a Patent for "Facebook\' in 1845..? (HOAX)
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Explosive Scoop on Obama from Breitbart.com
  Posted 9 days ago with 1 member flags