It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The computer systems of both the Obama and McCain campaigns were victims of a sophisticated cyberattack by an unknown "foreign entity," prompting a federal investigation, NEWSWEEK reports today.
At the Obama headquarters in midsummer, technology experts detected what they initially thought was a computer virus—a case of "phishing," a form of hacking often employed to steal passwords or credit-card numbers. But by the next day, both the FBI and the Secret Service came to the campaign with an ominous warning: "You have a problem way bigger than what you understand," an agent told Obama's team. "You have been compromised, and a serious amount of files have been loaded off your system." The following day, Obama campaign chief David Plouffe heard from White House chief of staff Josh Bolten, to the same effect: "You have a real problem ... and you have to deal with it." The Feds told Obama's aides in late August that the McCain campaign's computer system had been similarly compromised. A top McCain official confirmed to NEWSWEEK that the campaign's computer system had been hacked and that the FBI had become involved.
Officials at the FBI and the White House told the Obama campaign that they believed a foreign entity or organization sought to gather information on the evolution of both camps' policy positions—information that might be useful in negotiations with a future administration. The Feds assured the Obama team that it had not been hacked by its political opponents. (Obama technical experts later speculated that the hackers were Russian or Chinese.) A security firm retained by the Obama campaign took steps to secure its computer system and end the intrusion. White House and FBI officials had no comment earlier this week.
Originally posted by mattifikation
Oh now that's just scary.
It proves that once again our defense department is the bottom of the barrel when it comes to defending the country from cyber attacks. Supposedly the Air Force was going to be devoting a huge amount of resources to this type of defense. Apparently they need to quit screwing around and get on it.
Originally posted by mattifikation
So the civilian end is the weak link? It seems to me that the government should be stepping in and ensuring that the people who do these jobs are doing them well.
For starters, any computer or network used to do government or campaign work should be secured by the government's people. The right way. The first time.
Any civilian with such a job should be required to have government certification. You can't practice law or medicine without a license, and today, the security of our computers is just as vital for the safety of the country. Getting caught cutting corners should mean the suspension or loss of that license.
It sounds extreme, but it sure beats being brought to our knees by some unknown force that doesn't even need to put boots on our soil. I'm worried that could happen some day. I don't have a link, but awhile back there was a report that the country's entire nuclear power production could be easily threatened by hackers.
This campaign computer hack is nothing compared to some of the messes that malicious hackers could cause.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Originally posted by mattifikation
Oh now that's just scary.
It proves that once again our defense department is the bottom of the barrel when it comes to defending the country from cyber attacks. Supposedly the Air Force was going to be devoting a huge amount of resources to this type of defense. Apparently they need to quit screwing around and get on it.
I promise you, it is not the DoD that failed. It's the *%#$~ civilian 'security' contractors that are doing their usual half-assed effort. Whether it's at the behest of others or simple incompetence, this is the result of the continuous effort to 'outsource' everything because it would be cheaper than hiring an employee who would expect to be paid what he or she was worth.
I agree that China is the most active and typically involved in these matters, but we shouldn't forget the myriad Israeli company 'fronts' that are in this business - on behalf of their 'political' leadership. Ultimately, the only way to asses the damage realistically would be for the campaigns to share what was stored in their computer system. Think that's likely?
Then of course there's always blackmail. Some countries thrive on blackmailing our politicians. But the FBI and the CIA knew that already, since they do it themselves.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Originally posted by mattifikation
So the civilian end is the weak link? It seems to me that the government should be stepping in and ensuring that the people who do these jobs are doing them well.
For starters, any computer or network used to do government or campaign work should be secured by the government's people. The right way. The first time.
Any civilian with such a job should be required to have government certification. You can't practice law or medicine without a license, and today, the security of our computers is just as vital for the safety of the country. Getting caught cutting corners should mean the suspension or loss of that license.
It sounds extreme, but it sure beats being brought to our knees by some unknown force that doesn't even need to put boots on our soil. I'm worried that could happen some day. I don't have a link, but awhile back there was a report that the country's entire nuclear power production could be easily threatened by hackers.
This campaign computer hack is nothing compared to some of the messes that malicious hackers could cause.
Your preaching to the choir, my friend.
I have personally witness true geniuses in the government. You know what they do? They keep the system from collapsing. There is a core of mid to lower level management in there that have literally kept these people from screwing the pooch on numerous occasions. They are rarely recognized, virtually anonymous, and seldom the beneficiaries of government largess.
Then enter the politically or socially connected 'contractors' or 'vendors'. Their apparent function is to maintain the weakest hold on the status quo, and generally inhibit innovation or structural/organizational change from occurring, while simultaneously availing themselves of the opportunity to 'manufacture' consent as to their sacrosanct presence in the government. These corporate control-freaks are often the 'shadows' of every political appointee to the oversight branch. It's shameless, and fraught with fiduciary perils. They have been entrusted to re-engineer an organizational model to their benefit. And the one tool we could use to stop them isn't being used at all. Security clearances.
DoD should NOT employ corporate-sponsored civilians in capacities of leadership. They cannot be trusted as theirs is a corporate loyalty. Corporations which pride themselves on knowing no 'borders.' Therein by the way is another retched example of poor stewardship of the military institution. These 'civilians' somehow magically "automatically" get security clearances, many I dare suggest, wouldn't qualify for such clearances weren't for the commercial opportunity and the political/social connection 'engineered' by lobbyists and social elitists. This is one of many doorways to corrupting our government. It must be closed, or watched - probably both.
[/rant]
Originally posted by oconnection
It's funny even in this day in age how ignorant people are that Windows is for the most part very open. Even when paid professionals are tasked with guarding these computers it is still very taxing to deflect all types of attacks.
[edit on 6-11-2008 by oconnection]