It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Clearskies
reply to post by Deaf Alien
Since it has little to do with American history and belief, I would say no.
Maybe in Iran.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
[
Religion has no place in public schools; and the "theory" of creationism is exactly that... religious doctrine. It is not, and never will be, a scientific theory.
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
There is NO LAW in America that says you can't teach creation science now, so I don;t get the assignment. Nor will any law stand the Courts test if one was passed, it has been tried.
Scopes monkey trial, SCOPES LOST and ACLU paid the 100 dollar fine...
Learn your history, then maybe you can do a decent job on your assignment...
My opinion is easy one, teach neither Evolution or Creation in schools as both are not provable by empirical science methods. By the way Gravity is not a theory it is a LAW, just as the thermodynamic laws are.
You get an F already...
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
The extra-terrestrial seeding theory is not the most supported one. The most supported one is that basic amino acids were created as a result of the complex primordial chemical mixture, and a spark of life. This was replicated in the Miller-Urey experiment.
Actually, Miller used the wrong atmosphere model.The atmosphere model modern evolutionists say was around at the time of the development of the first cell was actually a mixture of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water, methane, and sulfur dioxide.
If your argument is that organic molecules is all that is required for the Miller-Urey experiment to be valid, then you are doing great. However, since the same things were not created in the corrected atmospheres, it is still invalid. The only organic compound that could be made from the corrected atmospheres is embalming fluid, which is a mix of cyanide and formaldehyde, as well as some other inert chemicals. embalming fluid is not enough to prove its validity. It is what would be the most prevalent secondary mixture in there, but it is a far cry from the possibility of life or even prelife.
Enshrined in high school textbooks, the Miller-Urey experiment raised expectations that scientists could unravel life’s origins with simple chemistry experiments. The excitement has long since subsided. The amino acids never grew into the more complex proteins. Scientists now think the composition of air on early Earth was different from what Dr. Miller used, leading some to question whether the Miller-Urey experiment had any relevance to the still-unsolved question of the origin of life.