US Military.... why?, page 14
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 1-2-2009 @ 09:32 AM by SuperViking
reply to post by pollovonfollo



International law is a joke to everyone who's given it enough thought. But, firstly, those people from the Balkans who are at the Hague couldn't have been there without American-led NATO intervention. That's the fact of the matter.

But beyond that, international law and the UN are failures. Collective security was seen to be a failure nearly a century ago, because it demands that all nations respond to what's deemed a threat in the same way, with the same measure of response. That assumes that all nations share the same risk, and that obviously isn't true. So there is breaks down and never recovers. It happened in Greece in 1923, and, more stunningly, it happened in Ethiopia in 1935. The UN is, at this point, entirely a tautological structure. When strong nations want to listen to it and use it, it's important. When they don't, it's not. Pointless. The UN has no job, it has no purpose; it just asks for money sometimes and wants a ride- like that cousin we all have. And that's the authority behind international law? You think a a system like that can work?

And ya know, it makes me partly ashamed to be an American. Why? The saddest part is this dumb**** Wilsonianism spread from the US to Europe, when we could've been spreading normal looking jeans or female armpit shaving. Disraeli, Metternich, Bismark- they all must be rolling in their graves. If you would've told a 19th century European statesman that in the future, they and their constituents would view war as an engagement where one side was "right" and the other was "wrong" they would've looked at you in disbelief. So would your average educated Englishman or Frenchman. War was seen as a natural result of competing and clashing national interests. But that ****ing Wilson. Worst ***hole ever, now everyone is an armchair moralist.

But you don't really want to talk about IR, do you? You just want a soapbox.


reply posted on 1-2-2009 @ 12:08 PM by dooper
reply to post by pollovonfollo



I also consider international law a joke.

As for the Hague courts, there wouldn't be a Hague court if not for the US.

You have a bug up your butt over the behavior of the US. That irritation is entirely different from trying to suggest a differing moral response to events that require military action.

You have a political problem - solve it politically.

You have a military problem - that means some folks need killing. War must be efficient, and I don't give a fuzzy rat's ass what your moral standpoint is, there's just no nice way to kill your enemies.

To be most merciful, you must be most ruthless. Get to the enemy, bring everything you have, overload your enemy, kill him in the greatest numbers, as efficiently as you can, in the greatest concentrations, and the war is quickly over.

There is a number of enemy, that must be killed before they quit. No one but the enemy determines what that number is.

The faster you reach that number, the quicker its over.

Morality in war?

Victory.

Not persistence.


reply posted on 6-3-2009 @ 01:27 PM by SkurkNilsen
reply to post by glimmerman



"This is the LAND of the FREE...BECAUSE of the BRAVE"

More like the land of:

Slavery.
False Flag Operations
Consumerism
High School Shootings
Obesity
Illiteracy
Poverty
Genocide Of It's Native Population
Corporate Controle Of Government
Foreig Debt

Because of:

Corporate Controle Of Government
People Willing To Let Themselves Be Tools
Consumerism
CitiGroup
Corporate Greed
Corruption Put In A System (Lobbyism and Election Funding)
Media Brainwashing (FOXNews)

Im no fan of Michael Moore, but here's a glimps of what the U.S could have if it wasn't so damn stupid that they let the corporate bastards let you play war so they can make money. The point isn't to make $$$$$ but to preserve the population, the U.S has, I mean had no real enemies but still are fighting wars all over the world. How hard can it possibly be to se the connection?
And don't come blahblah'ing about 9/11, after killing a couple houndred thousand in Iraq and Afghanistan your thirst for revenge should be sattisfied, even if you just made yourself a bigger target through doing so.
And also all your b.s about how when in a situation you just do what is necessary, you should never have been in that situation in the first place, it's that easy.
Good luck to you guys in the army, I wish you and your loved ones the best.




reply posted on 5-4-2010 @ 02:32 PM by MischeviousElf
Bump

To answer the OP's first Thread Qusetions in the form of:

WikiLeaks Video Released

Which along with others mentioned here, may explain why some feel unsure of the men who represent their countries.

Elf
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 14 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 8 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 18 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 10 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 15 days ago with 57 member flags