It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A man who has spent 20 years studying aerial phenomenon said today a mysterious object seen in West Texas and New Mexico was a spacecraft from one of the neighboring planets.
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to post by Frank Warren
Thank you for sharing that story. Many people forget to realize that Lonnie Zamora saw an egg shaped object.
Originally posted by lifeform
sorry the first thing i could think of was this uk.youtube.com...
an intresting story, thanks for sharing.
Originally posted by kitos
reply to post by Frank Warren
Good revist.
The thing i would like to menton is the fact that the craft used "thruster" type engine to take off. This leads me to believe also that the craft is a shuttle and not a intersteler craft. I would venture a guess that it came from the Moon but a Mother Ship is also possible.
Also the engine quiting on the car indicates a stong EM feild pressent to be able to disrupp the coil of the car for there was not elecronic ignition in that car at that time. That would led me to believe that there is anouther type of engine on the craft that uses electricity some way.
I wanna meet them in the flesh.
Originally posted by kitos
Copy that Frank.
If i remeber correctly the craft took off with a roar, not a common description of you typical soundless ufo. Also the ground was "burnt" at the point of touchdown, so it lends creadance to a fule type engine that produces noise and heat, so buy the size alone of the craft there would have to be room for fule.
I am not an expert by anymeans but there is calcualtions for thrust based on wheight to fule ratio.
The size of this craft at that time does not match anything that nasa was showing the puplic.
So maybe the craft does not have enough power to break earths gravity.
Food for thought.
Cheers,
Kitos
Sorry all,
Originally posted by Scramjet76
reply to post by kitos
Sorry all,
Don't be.
Check out those links I provided. Unless there was a mass hallucination with physical effects (electrical systems dying), then this case is a slam dunk. Even if one witness reported a "roar," I don't think anyone else did. When you see an object move that fast it is human nature to expect a roar. Perhaps in their astonished psychological state they interpreted a noise as louder than it truly was? Just a thought..
In checking "other" reports, there were in fact additional witnesses who "heard a roar." However, since we're ignorant to UFO propulsion systems, this doesn't "prove" anything definitively.
Originally posted by Scramjet76
reply to post by Frank Warren
In checking "other" reports, there were in fact additional witnesses who "heard a roar." However, since we're ignorant to UFO propulsion systems, this doesn't "prove" anything definitively.
hey frank,
Well I guess what I was getting at is what percentage of the reports heard roar vs didn't hear roar. You know? Pure math is the only way to sort it now I supose.
One more thing. Even though we're ignorant to UFO propulsion, we do have access to a dataset which points to "silence/lownoise" as an attribute.
-SJ76