posted on Nov, 3 2008 @ 11:27 AM
reply to post by ThroatYogurt
Sorry, I had to laugh there. Even though I don't see eye to eye with TY on quite a few 911 'issues' I must agree. The man said 'pull it' which,
logically, can mean virtually anything. Without an actual admission there is no way to confirm what he meant. Of course you won't get that
admission so stick to the OP.
As for the videos, well, nothing has changed my opinion one bit as to them falling completely unlike they should have with the damage they received as
described by ANYONE.
Although, I must also state that the pieces shown during the collapse do appear to be the core and not the exterior. Still doesn't mean the building
should have came down that way. Why? Well, first off, that core was broken thus from that point and up the building should have collapsed to one
side or the other. Not straight down with little to no resistence. Still not buying it.
Just another part of the many coincidences that surround this event.
The same for WTC 7. There is no reason (main support beam 1993993745 collapsing at once or not) for that building to come straight down (all four
corners) at the same time. To the side of major damage towards where the towers were? Yeah. But straight down? Nope. Not buying it.
Nice vids though.