reply to post by exponent
The WTC was not a normal controlled demolition, who is saying it was, YOU?
There has never been a demo done on any building of this size this was not done with conventional explosives. (My opinion only)
This is a perfect example of why people typically don't respond to your posts unless they agree with you.
Humm, Pot calling the kettle black.
I asked you specifically to name why and how the perimeter column sections would be ejected
We really do not know why, not until a real investigation is done. However looking at the video and pictures that SPreston has shown us, there is no
denying the perimeter column was being ejected up and outward.
You have completely failed to answer this in any manner, and have accused me of denying explosives.
Now now, you and everyone including me, fail sometimes to answer questions, so “stop” being so demanding.
Are you denying explosives?
[ b]Why and how were these columns ejected out and up according to you?
We know they were by examining the photos and the video you would have to be blind to not see it, infact that is proof.
What possible reason is there for this method, and how would such a large amount of explosives be planted on every floor of the WTC without
a single tenant noticing?
We do not know why the reason for this method but it just happened that way
Who is saying it was a large amount of explosives?
Who is saying planted on every floor?
I am not interested in your copied and pasted posts
Then why is it ok for you to do it? Should we not be interested in your copied and past post then.
which do nothing but accuse everyone of being complicit in the attacks,
It dose not and that is your “opinion” only.
I am interested in evidence,
If the poster has not given you enough evidence to prove his point then this is a good time for “you” to do some digging you might find what you
are looking for, instead of insulting the poster.
something your posts thus far have been sorely lacking.
If it is so sorely lacking, why do you respond.