posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 08:28 PM
Originally posted by dampnickers
reply to post by Sonya610
You like the poster before you, obviously did not get the point of my comment.
You also IGNORANTLY disregarded my last comments about penal colonies.
Is that the action of someone using their brain? I think not!
My comment was to provoke thought. We hear all the time of these 'girls' that flaunt it, and cry rape. They are the girls that should be locked up
as psychotic cock-teases!
As for the women that are raped in the army, well, as one poster has already suggested, they know they aren't signing up for an easy ride.
Now you cannot tell me that in the dead of the night, they cannot wake a bunk mate, or a fellow female officer and get them to go to the loo with
In addition, I do not for one second suggest that the rape of women is anything to be 'excused' in any way shape or form. Again if you learned to
read my posts, instead of thinking that you have, you might see that I will refer you back to my earlier comment about it being a shame we haven't
got penal colonies any more.
Also, as several have already said here, what about the rape of men in prisions... you seem to want this to be all about women. Why? Do you have a
hidden femenist agenda here?
Again, I will re-iterate, for those of you incapable of being able to read simple words on a screen:
Rape is wrong, it is a crime, and those that commit this crime should be locked away permanently (or shipped off to an island prision). However, what
surprises me is that you show an inordinate lack of compassion. Instead of suggesting how these women could or should come forward, you vilifiy the
criminals... that is just the sort of attitude and stance to take if you want problems like this to continue! Bravo.
I don't seem to be able to get the different point your trying to make, from the one you're making with your own words.
If a woman wears a skimpy outfit, she knows she's attracting rapists.
If a woman wears sexy clothes in public, she should be locked up as a cock tease.
If a woman joins the military, she knows what to expect if rapes occur.
Seems like a lot of blame shifting to me.
If a man thinks he can touch a woman who does not consent to being touched, it does NOT matter if she is naked and parading around in stilettos', he
has NO right to put a finger on her.
If a woman wears attractive clothing in public, you do NOT get to lock them up because of what it may cause some barbarians to think. Or would you
have them all in a burqa under sharia law? Perhaps a stoning to teach the little ladies a lesson in how to act?
If a woman meets the requirements to join the armed forces, there is NO excuse for her being treated any less than any other fellow serving officer.
You're really making the point that rape is wrong, but it appears from your posts that you're also saying that it's the woman's fault if it does
happen. Regardless of what you would do to the perpetrator.
Maybe YOU need to rethink your logic here, and if you still come to the conclusion that a woman is at fault for what she wears or how she acts if she
is touched in a nonconsensual manner, or that if a woman goes out of her way to be attractive and therefore should be locked up to save her from rape,
then that is disgusting.