Ok, I know this is not a ufo landing on the white house lawn and not nearly as interesting as a message channeled from Blosson Crazychild but it is important people. It is our freedom of speach at stake here folks.

Free speech is of course important. But what can you do except to try and run for election in order to create better laws. This is democracy after all. In my country they are starting to watch what is going on in the internet, which is good to a certain point. But it would not be nice not to be able to write what I think.

Some web sites publish only what they want. ATS is just like that. I cannot post anonymously without they censoring my posts. ATS has even very high censoring, because I posted 2 alright messages (in my opinion) and both was not published. This is my third post. Let's see if this goes through or not.

Seems like it's coming from a reputable source.

No, it would be a bad idea.

Originally posted by SuperViking
No, it would be a bad idea.

why would it be a bad idea to stop america from blockng its citizens from going on websites like this

i think it would be a good idea to stand up and do something

[edit on 2-11-2008 by Anti - Government]

It would be a bad idea to think it was coming from a reputable source. I mean, look at the webpage and it's other articles. THe US can't even ban Lolita from libraries in the middle of nowhere in Kansas, but they'll receive support for blocking certain internet sites across the country? Obviously not.

The article is a great piece of fiction.

I got that glossed over the eyes look when reading about how the president is a figurehead (true) but others (more menacing) run the government. Also enjoyed the comment about the FBI and DHS.

I'm fairly pissed about the bailout and I have guns so I guess my internet will be censored. I'll probably be even more pis*ed about that than the bailout, but no one asked me for my opinion.

On a very positive note, I saw another more interesting article on the site about Obama's communist parentage. Perhaps we can have another thread started....

We SHOULD keep an eye on this story.

We should also keep an eye on pigs taking over the world and the moon actually being as large as a plate and suspended 30 feet in the air. Keep an eye on all three breaking stories.

The concept is like a frog trying to swallow a Volkswagen. The only method to do this is block everything but port 80 and 443. That would cripple businesses all over.

If it's passed they wont be capable of enforcing it let alone planning an enforcement. Look at the great firewall of china-it fails constantly with trivial techniques.

For those who say it can't happen: it's allready being done in Brittain for example.

several sites like infowars.com etc are allready being censored.

The key word for the future the elite gets off on is 'Internet 2'

They're saying they're going to allow the old hubs to degrade, so they can install this new 'internet' which would only have a couple hundred websites in which you would have to subscribe to one of these sites to open your own website.

When they don't agree with the contents, they can just delete your website legally, instead of having to rely on hackers to attack your site.. as happened to ATS several times for example.

This is indeed a HUGE item!

For example, how many people rely on ATS to get some news that isn't censored by the powers that be ?

that is only possible because it is on http:// www.abovetopsecret.com, and not for example on http:// foxnews/abovetopsecret.com.

Censorship of the Internet is allready going on for years in countrys like China.. their economy is raportedly the biggest booming industry on the planet, so do not delude yourself based on that 'naah, it won't happen, it'll hurt the economy'

Get the word out and protest!

[edit on 2-11-2008 by Phatcat]

Get out the word and protest against cellphones winning voting rights while you're at it! DON'T LET THEM VOTE THEY'RE JUST PHONES!

So, where is the bill the article speaks of? Who is this insider?

I'm not going to say he/she's a fraud, but come on, this isn't information. It's speculation in its present form.

Originally posted by Phatcat
For those who say it can't happen: it's allready being done in Brittain for example.

several sites like infowars.com etc are allready being censored

[edit on 2-11-2008 by Phatcat]

slightly confused here ! i visit infowars and im in the UK, are you saying that there are places on the site i cant get too ?

You can't. It's a mirror site with all the good stuff taken down, but with just enough information to make you think it's legit. Welcome to the conspiracy.

Anyone who thinks the Government is not going to censor the internet - not do everything in it’s power to shut each and very web site down that's in any way controversial, a way to bypass main line pharmaceuticals, anti-government, pro-Second Amendment, anything that isn’t PRO ESTABLISHMENT?
You’re head is buried in the sand up to your hind end.

The Internet Security Act has already been written.
It’s patiently waiting - just drooling in fact - for an internet disaster to *Miraculously Happen* (false flag - or blame falling on Bin Laden the Boogeyman) so it can then present itself to the people in all it’s glory to do what?
*Save Us*.
After, probably with no vote at all (or one reminiscent of the Bail Out) it will be held up as law and immediately implemented.

So, back to playing World Of Warcraft all of you who think it could never happen.
No, the internet is NOT safe, and, it’s NOT in the hands of the people, at least not for long.

When I say *not long* - how long is that?
Well, I wouldn’t be surprised if soon after the new president is elected there will be an Internet Crisis giving the grand excuse to implement the Internet Security Act.

I hope you all like rice.

Great Post CBass - S&F!


...taps...

Great thread cbass star n flag.

Your source sounds and seems solid. Any more info on him/her?

The inbred scum running America are very jealous and envious of the Chinese system. They are tired from maintaining their facade for so long. Can't be easy having to be a wolf in sheep's clothing on that scale.

If your goal was to control the populace you would definitely want to ensure "mandatory blocking of socially disruptive material".

Especially if the material was exposing how socially disruptive you are.....


Peace