It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fmcanarney
it is impossible for anyone to make someone else feel bad about who they are.
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by fmcanarney
it is impossible for anyone to make someone else feel bad about who they are.
It is very possible.
Especially when prejudice and hate is legitimized through public policy.
I just don't understand how you don't see a problem with "hateful language" but even mentioning the fact that a penis fits into several different orifices (basic biology and fact) is offensive.
This is probably one of the most ridiculous, absurd, and offensive arguments are person can make on this topic.
...
'since it feels good, it must be OK' + It doesn't hurt anyone and doesn't involve any unwilling participants.
...
And this is really the point, as a whole we are moving forward. We are becoming more accepting of people's differences.
I'm sorry but my language had nothing to do with "shock". Talking about a penis or vagina or even an anus is not at all offensive or shocking to me.
The fact of the matter is that considering a person to be defective is a lot more offensive than talking about basic biology.
I'm not berating anyone. Being prejudice or hateful is not a characteristic that I'm going to respect as a difference.
Again, I have nothing personally against you, there is no reason to make the discussion so petty.
I believe you are more intelligent than this ignorant point of view conveys. I don't believe you are a hateful person, but you are still expressing hate out of ignorance.
We don't need to divide each other, we are all in this together.
Originally posted by Jezus
If you guys really don't have a problem with homosexuality then who cares about this?
I'm not gay.
Kindergartners should be able to understand that you don't treat people differently because of their inherent differences. A teacher should be able to express this without getting into the mechanics of sex.
What is on the actual card is of little importance, as long as the point is conveyed.
The reason the card was about LGBT is because it is probably the area that people are MOST comfortable with using hateful language (gay, fag, homo).
This would never even be posted if the card had been about racial hate language.
If you guys really don't have a problem with homosexuality then who cares about this?
I couldn't care less about this subject specifically I only entered the thread at the sight of ignorance to the fact that homosexuality is natural.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
Perhaps another, more appropriate term would be useful here? 'Normal' comes to mind, meaning the usual propensity of the species, but I can see where that too would have negative connotations. Anyone got any ideas?
Originally posted by TheRedneck I think the term 'natural' is a bit out of place here, agreed. Homosexuality exists; that much is a fact. Whether or not it is 'natural' seems to me to be a bit subjective. It would not be natural for me, but I can understand where someone else might consider it to be natural for them.
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by TheRedneck I think the term 'natural' is a bit out of place here, agreed. Homosexuality exists; that much is a fact. Whether or not it is 'natural' seems to me to be a bit subjective. It would not be natural for me, but I can understand where someone else might consider it to be natural for them.
My experience in developmental psychology has shown me that children respond very well to simplified explanations of complex concepts rather than misinformation or complete avoidance of the subject.
This is really the base of the disagreement. (different points of views on what is natural, and if unnatural is negative)
I agree their really isn't a need for children that young to sign something with those words on it. However, I do hold that it wouldn't be a bad thing. My experience in developmental psychology has shown me that children respond very well to simplified explanations of complex concepts rather than misinformation or complete avoidance of the subject.
Overall I would guess that homosexuality is biologically natural for humans. This is debated but since both animals exhibit the trait and a few other reasons I believe homosexuality is natural.
I agree that heterosexulaity is the default.
Homosexuality is going to increasingly be “in your face”, if you want to look at it that way.
But It makes people happy and leave more girls for the rest of us...
Oh man, you are becoming more politically correct by the moment being in this thread.