It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

is this NASA video Proof that E.T.'s are trying to contact us ?

page: 5
49
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 02:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by snowen20
Im sorry, every ounce of my being is trying to accept what I see are space aliens and intelligent craft, But the adult in me says it's space dust.

Wow. that was incredibly smug I apologize.

I want to believe it is alien craft flying in formation but it is just SCREAMING "SPACE DUST"..


cool, i was'nt aware space dust could light up like a fairy light, and only formed in circle patterns and also had the ability to float about and then just stop using its own free will.

are you sure its the adult part that is seeing space dust?

en.wikipedia.org...

heres a comparison.

whatever it is it is'nt space dust.

heres another comparison to your typical space debris just incase you were talking about something larger than a few millimetres.

en.wikipedia.org...




posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 02:45 AM
link   
Personaly I think they look very like orbs that can be captured with a digital cam. Maybe they are space orbs??????



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 02:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Beauty_HairyBeast
 


maybe? is that a guess? do you have an example of a space orb?



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 02:54 AM
link   
No its not a guess, its just an observation, as I have taken pics and captured orbs before. They appear to have the hole in the middle, exactly like some of these ufos/space debris. You can find many pictures of orbs on the net.

[edit on 2-11-2008 by Beauty_HairyBeast]



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Beauty_HairyBeast
No its not a guess, its just an obsevation, as I have taken pics and captured orbs before. They appear to have the hole in the middle, exactly like some of these ufos/space debris. You can find many pictures of orbs on the net.


can you show me an example where lots are captured on film? and moving around in different places and moving behind other objects?



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:08 AM
link   
No I cant because i have not looked specifically for orbs floating around but I have many pictures taken one after the other and it does appear that they move around in a very similar way.
Im not here to prove that they are orbs, just saying the likeness is uncanny!!



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by scobro
As for all the debunkers,why don't you open your minds to what it could be,rather than what you think it should be!

It goes both ways guy. You have to open your mind to the possibility that there is nothing to these videos at all. Just could some natural phenomenon that we do not know about.



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:12 AM
link   
Orbs have been proven over and over again to be dust particles. I hate that when a ghost hunters shows pictures of orbs and says they are ghosts.



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by riggs2099
reply to post by easynow
 


Don't be angry I pointed out the flaws with your supposed aliens/alien space craft. Remember it is all theory and not fact...i just came along with my own theories....


Theories are fine and a welcome contribution to any thread, but your attitude that went with it shows that you're not at all interested in expressing your opinion but that you'd rather ridicule people.



Edited...

Seems the post I replied to was a one off, so I apologise if I came off abrupt. I just get tired of people who start posts by labeling the topic or the comments of another as 'pathetic'.. Cest la vie.




[edit on 11/2/2008 by bloodcircle]



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:18 AM
link   
I dont know what orbs are, i have pictures of coloured ones too but I would not say they are ghosts or dust. I think they are some sort of atmospheric phenomena.
Why cant someone just say "Yes they do look similar to orbs" instead of questioning my observation? Im not even saying that I know what orbs are for gods sake



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:20 AM
link   
reply to post by riggs2099
 


Do you really ,in your heart of hearts,believe that these objects are ice or dust particles or lens flares or whatever?

I have looked at this subject from both sides of the fence,and i have tried to take a skeptical view on it,but i just can't get away from the idea that these objects seem to be intelligently controlled!

Have you looked at this from both sides?

The only problem i have with all of this is whether these objects are biological or artificial.



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:22 AM
link   
The object in the OP's videos in formation could just as easily be some sort of very high tech satellite experiment, though there is always the possibility that it is some attempt at communication from an unknown intelligence. We've had light bulbs that are transparent and when powered up appear to solidify. I'm not saying these are giant light bulbs, but what we see is not so far beyond our technology to duplicate.

For the debunkers who think the geometry is off or that these are ice crystals - consider the size of the playing field there and the fact that the shuttle camera you're viewing is moving away from the object at an odd angle. Although there are some objects in some videos I have seen that are debris or ice crystals shed by the shuttle that is not the case in the opening video.

If it is an unknown intelligence presenting a message, the idea that they're going to fly up and interface with shuttle computers, or communication systems like "Star Trek" is just wishful thinking by the debunkers. They may be in a position to create a visual show when they notice the shuttle passing by, but they might doing this from a considerable distance away - making the ability to do a space walk and come up and shake hands in the airlock impossible.

The equivalent of a stranded boater shooting a flare as a message for a passing airplane. It's the closest common denominator for communication in his situation. Besides they could be so much different than us, it would be like us dropping toys in the water to communicate with dolphins.

The poster that complained about the accuracy of the circle, first of all we have no way to measure the accuracy from the data we have, also consider that to send a message you only need to be accurate enough for those looking to recognize your message. It's like watching a old television - the accuracy or resolution was not important - it was the programming or the message that mattered.

Regardless of what these objects are one thing we can agree on is they're not figments of our imaginations and we are seeing something.

NASA has a job to do and if there's something that they don't have complete control over, for national security reasons they have to keep their hand secret.

Of course there's things they are aware of that they can't disclose at this point - at least not directly. I have no doubt that they are just as baffled or clueless about some matters.

With multiple countries heading for space, the moon and beyond in the next couple decades one thing is for sure, soon NASA won't be the only group aware of what's happening outside our atmosphere.

[edit on 2-11-2008 by verylowfrequency]



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 03:33 AM
link   
honestly, people talk about logic and having proof, and not speculating, yet its all ive seen with some of the explainations so far.

obviously some people don't pratice what they preach.



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 04:01 AM
link   
reply to post by _Phoenix_
 


The videos you just posted have been totally debunked in "UFO Hunters" from History Channel.
Watch these segments, they talk about the exact same video you posted, and debunks the incident with no doubt.




[edit on 2-11-2008 by DwaynetheSpecious]



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 04:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by lifeform
can you show me an example where lots are captured on film? and moving around in different places and moving behind other objects?


Not sure what videos you're talking about, but the ones in the subject of this thread are not and have nothing to do with the medium "Film". Were talking about object captured in digital video not "film".

If you're really interested - all you need to do is go look at "the smoking gun" DVD's not the crappy internet versions you see at youtube.


Originally posted by lifeform
honestly, people talk about logic and having proof, and not speculating, yet its all ive seen with some of the explainations so far.



If one does not have the ability to speculate - than one will never have a clue what the answers might be - unless it lands on their head.

If nobody ever looked up at a bird and said I wonder how I can fly, then nobody would ever have flown.

Seriously if you people cannot imagine - I baffled why you even waste your time on threads like this?

Maybe your should stick to watching sitcoms or playing video games.

[edit on 2-11-2008 by verylowfrequency]



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 04:10 AM
link   
The key is in the pulsating. Document the pulses, figure out the message as I did, it will change your life forever. Have said too much.



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 04:12 AM
link   
Its interesting that you mention this is digital film recordings, orbs are also picked up on digital cam. They also look like a kind of cell, so its possible these could be biological? Hmmmmm



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 04:37 AM
link   
Nice post Easynow, I have watched the videos and without a shadow of doubt they are NOT ice particles,swampgas,venus or lens flare and thats for sure.

The problem with the skeptics is that they will never believe not until a UFO is hovering over their and thats fine, seeing is believing and all that. Also you have to remember that something so revolutionary will always be shot down on ATS.


The world is changing and where there was only a small group of EBE'S in contact on this planet more and more are coming such exciting days for us all.

Deservedly starred + flagged



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 04:38 AM
link   
reply to post by DwaynetheSpecious
 


Thanks for providing a link to those videos. As far as anything being totally debunked as you say - maybe you didn't watch the entire videos yourself.

The only thing they did is show how objects in the foreground can be optical illusions and appear to be behind when there are really not when telephoto lenses are used. That potentially covered some of the objects in the tether video and perhaps a few others, but they are just a fraction of what has been seen. No doubt many of these objects are debris, but don't allow a few debris as a blanket explanation for everything in all videos.

Did you miss the objects in formation that they couldn't explain - the subject of this thread? Did you listen to interviews & commentary of several astronauts that claim to have seen strange objects up there?



posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 05:11 AM
link   
reply to post by verylowfrequency
 


No problem, I did not post the videos I posted as a reply to the starting threads videos, but to the fella my reply was directed at. Stupid to state that I did not even watch the videos myself - why would I then post them?
I really think the "UFO Hunters" nailed the tether incident... the things they come up with look EXACTLY like the original NASA video.

The videos posted in the starting thread are quite astounding, and I agree, they look very weird just to be debris.

[edit on 2-11-2008 by DwaynetheSpecious]



new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join