It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

is this NASA video Proof that E.T.'s are trying to contact us ?

page: 2
49
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 07:53 PM
link   
If they REALLY want attention though, then they're just not doing it right. It shouldn't be too hard for them to land or send radio signals to different places around the world. However, if they're using some sort of communication we can't understand, then maybe they don't want to make further contact until we can actually understand somehow. Just my speculation though.




posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticalSteve
reply to post by SpookyVince
 


This is the first UFO I've seen that seems to be aliens. They seem transparent, not very physical and then they light up.


This verifies what that recent video stated about the genius who was shown one of the crashed UFO's in hopes he could tell them how it worked, and he said it not only reacted to his touch but also his thoughts.

He aslo said it was translucent, stronger than steel but semi transparent.

There was no wiring or even a control panel because he believed the pilot was the control center by mere thought.
when he suspected they really didn't understand how it worked, he told his handlers "this wasn't designed or made by anyone on earth was it" and they became very mad at him and said he had to leave.

Just a tad more advanced then anything we currently have.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:01 PM
link   
It's all about the spheres. The spheres have been spotted around crop circles which use geometry to communicate with us IF crop circles are to be believed. Now here we have spheres forming a circle in space seemingly trying to communicate. Did a sphere also disarm a missle in flight as caught on camera? They are looking like nice guys to me.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:08 PM
link   
Anyway a few more videosI found just browsing.

A few examples of objects changing direction.




None of these objects appear in front of the Discovery Shuttle but only behind.



Interesting, hmmm.



[edit on 1-11-2008 by _Phoenix_]



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by GrayFox
If they REALLY want attention though, then they're just not doing it right. It shouldn't be too hard for them to land or send radio signals to different places around the world. However, if they're using some sort of communication we can't understand, then maybe they don't want to make further contact until we can actually understand somehow. Just my speculation though.


Yeah, imagine if these are not crafts thou, but maybe some sort of see through organisms that somehow survive above our atmosphere, kind of how you find strange creatures in our deep sea.

Who knows.



[edit on 1-11-2008 by _Phoenix_]



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:30 PM
link   
reply to post by _Phoenix_
 


so if the hundreds and hundreds of scientist that study space.. and every trip into space and all the data.. film... photos... experiments.. space walks.. shuttle launches.. shuttle surroundings.. shuttle structure... every aspect of the surroundings of the space shuttle.. and they have come to the conclusion that it is ice particles .... they are all idiots.. and you guys are the real brains behind the space program??? oh.. wow... the hell with watching the nasa channel anymore.. im going to get all my space information from you guys.. uh huh. sure.. yuppers.. them bunch of no good scientist that cant tell a frozen ice cube from an intergalactic flying space ship.. all those years of schooling.. and hard study.. years and years of trips into space... sending along the most advanced equipment ,, space walks ... years of data.. photos.. film..analyzing ... all thrown down the toilet... where have you guys been ... ??? and here I thought these guys new something about what they do for a living.. damnnnnnnnn



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:53 PM
link   
reply to post by philjwolf
 


So let me interpret that, people who use logic, common sense, judgment and reason to come to their own conclusions on something as DUMBER than people who nod their heads and say "yup, what he said"?


I mean, did I miss something there?

Do they LOOK like dust or space ice? Have you ever seen dust or space ice do formation flying before? Im just curious here because im pretty sure the answer to that from 99.9999999999% of sane people would actually be well, really, no.

At which point, scary thought, you might have to concede the fact that someone isnt telling you something and, dear me, you have to actually make your OWN decision on it!!

Actually, while we are here.....would anyone like to buy some formation flying ice particles? original, one off deal, promise you will never get a set like them!!



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:16 PM
link   
Ok, on the topic, a little theory that popped into my head.

People say, whats the point, are they stupid, dont they have anything better to say, why not speak to us.

Maybe the message wasnt for "us" as in Joe Public. Lets assume for second there was a truth in them coming here and advised us to not nuke ourselves to death, and that whoever did indeed take action against them treating them as hostile.

Maybe the message was for them and from that perspective, maybe the message for the goons behind NASA is pretty clear.

The flashing object which appears last may well signify Earth, notice all the others appear first in some kind of sequence, maybe thats a representation of other lifes, older races and world who have been around a lot longer....and the very last light to appear in the middle is little Earth.

The message might then be "We are older, wiser, and we are all around you." kind of like a none aggressive version of "you are surrounded".

It might seem agressive but maybe thats our way of looking at it, we might look at is as something we need to learn, we dont rule space and sooner or later if we want to leave this world and grow up in the universe, we are going to have to accept our part of something larger and accept them!

Its a very intriguing message really if you interpret it that way.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:18 PM
link   
I have had NVGs (night vision Goggles) on in the deep forrests of Germany and looking up at the sky with NO lights on, i have seen numerous "objects" do figure eights, right turns and revers directions at impossible speeds. Put on some good ole NVGs and take a gander at the night sky (somewhere dark and remote) and youll be mesmorized at what you see! SERIOUS!

No, it wasnt satalites or bugs either, i know what they look like. it was though, at about the same altitude as the satalites (estimate).

[edit on 1-11-2008 by musclefreak]



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Wow, this is absolutely stunning footage. I would honestly like to see someone come here and offer an explanation to possibly debunk this one. This is intelligent, there's no doubt about it. Speechless...



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:34 PM
link   
reply to post by philjwolf
 
perhaps more fiber and less television would help, for realistically, it isn't a matter of all those you mentioned being of inferior mental ability, it is more or less are you going to actually believe some of the answers they actually give??? and, considering nothing is ever dis-seminated to John Q public without being laundered, powdered, and run thru the hands of the ptb numerous times, oh, well, we have to take every word as gospel???

Let's see now:
1. Area 51 doesn't exist

2. The SR-71 Blackbird doesn't exist

3.The B-58 Hustler doesn't exist.

4. The F-117doesn't exist

yet all of a sudden it's whoops, we were wrong, they actually do exist,, we just didn't want to admit it for reasons of national security.

And you actually think they are going to tell you anything of value or truth?

Only if it serves their purposes and agenda.


seeker



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by philjwolf
 
You've managed to do in two posts, what others have taken dozens of posts to make me do, that is ignore you. Not that you care, neither do I.

You really believe those hundreds of scientists studying space, haven't been told to keep their mouths shut if they enjoy getting a paycheck? Love it, those that think the government can't keep a secret.


Now, on topic, I've seen those videos before, and to those that think it's space dust? well..........I may have a bridge you may be interested in purchasing. Priceless, ice crystals? could be, but the nasa employees that said it's just ice crystals, don't know for sure what it was, they just know it wasn't swamp gas reflecting off Venus. They also know they couldn't use the same excuses they use for the sightings we have here on terra firma.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by _Phoenix_
There is another video I saw before, which I thought was amazing, it had a LOT of thse objects in it, all the same shape, with that little gap.

Let me see if I can find it.

Edit:
This is it, what makes this video amazing is all the objects are identical, someone explain how that would be possible if it's just debris?) and you even see one that appears to go behind the tether, which is 12 miles long! Space dust? That would be one huge 2 mile space dust.

Long version


Change direction


Small video


It's the shape that makes me think this is something more than debris.



[edit on 1-11-2008 by _Phoenix_]


The giant one going behind the teather's been debunked and recreated by the UFO magazine/tv series it turns out you can create a lens flare exactly the same as seen in the video big let down when I saw it debunked.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Darthorious
 


Actually its been :claimed to be debunked.

Smart people might tell you lens flares really dont behave anything like that especially since theres more than one moving in very specific directions, although im fairly sure someone would love for the "debunk" to stick


Bottom line, careful who you trust, like Mulder said, trust noone. People have a brain and my best advice to anyone would be to use it, make you own mind up on EVERYTHING. Truth in the modern age is transcient and deceptive. Someone tells you they are telling the truth, you can be pretty sure they might be lying.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 09:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Darthorious
 


The giant one going behind the teather's been debunked and recreated by the UFO magazine/tv series it turns out you can create a lens flare exactly the same as seen in the video big let down when I saw it debunked.


so because someone can recreate the effect that debunks it ?


that comparison argument does not prove in my opinion that this tether critter does not exist and it surely doesn't prove that it did't go behind the tether





posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by philjwolf
 


I never came to any conclusion, and I don't know how you easily come to your conclusion, are you feeling OK tonight? LOL.

Anyway I'm off, goodnight.

Edit: It's funny, it seems most of your posts are in the aliens and UFO forum, and almost all of them are negative! and a bit annoying hehe. It seems like you hate this subject, doesn't it give you a headache coming on here to tell everyone how negative you are about UFO's all the time?
Maybe you should try hanging around another subject?



[edit on 1-11-2008 by _Phoenix_]



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 10:05 PM
link   
UFOs move that way because they usually exist in other dimensions. In order to interact with us or show themselves, they restrict themselves to the 3rd dimension which would have a heavier feeling. Like the Roswell alien breathing with much difficulty.

It would be like someone moving in water, awkward.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 10:13 PM
link   
Like moths to a light the huge "ships" swarmed to the glowing tether.

Giant translucent lifeforms...Looks like.

Could they be some form of created biological living ships like cosmic horses?

Could the "aliens" harness them to transport them across space?...Possibly.



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


Excellent deduction!


Lens flares dont go behind objects.

Its interesting that you can often learn more about a subject via its opposition than you can from the proposition itself



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 10:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
I'm pretty new to the alien views but find it incredibly interesting and am open minded enough to analyze all views of life.

Tell me if i'm wrong or not, but at 57 seconds you'll see whatever the object is, come into view on the bottom left. At 1:01 or 1:02 it looks as though it expells a plume of smoke, sorta like a smoke ring, and it continue's to rise.

Anyone else notice this?


thanks Anonymous for your post and maybe you should join ATS ?

anyways i see what your saying however if you watch close you can see that the object your talking about seems to come up from behind the other object and what is really cool is that particular object in question looks to me to procceed to take a position in the formation and then lights up with the rest of them...

here is the first part where it comes into view


and then you can see it going past the other object in this frame


and then i believe it is this one that lights up


good eye...hope this helps



new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join