It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The Censors (the grand conspiracy)

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 02:08 PM
–noun 1. an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds."

Do you trust what art foretells? Do you understand not every prophesy is written with words?

If so, read on...

Look at the Makaveli the Don Killuminati album cover. See it by any image search on any search engine you trust.

What two things are yet censored on the picture that relate with the male human body? Turn the two things into two names used the most... You should see either two Censors or two Censored concerning a raised black male. Hmm, I say. And I tell you the only black male getting raised in America is Obama. Do not think the art is 2pac, because 2pac is dead, but the art lives foward for telling a relevant story when working with the basics.

It may make you think:

The black male is crossed by two or is a crosser to two. The black male is either dead or barely alive. You see not what has happened with the two covered up or with the two covering, since the censor sign on the art is both black and white.

Now turn your attention to the art deemed to be by Nostradamus...

One watercolor reveals a two tale book through two BLANK (foretelling an edit or censor) pages shown... It also has a long black beard attacting a male who has no color or a white color... Two is associated with two terms in a presidential note. The none colored or white male holds the two outterly as if a third something or a new something not a president.

A theme in both arts is they have a two and a one in some mix. And a false implication, for or against, can bring censoring. And a resented implication against somebody can bring censoring. And a revered implication for somebody can bring censoring.

The final theme is everyone who sees the art works they might apply into, and go for or against them. Or, somebody outside censors or is censored.

So a very general conspiracy you should expect is some great censoring sort. A censoring like none before. A censoring which puts ruin far away from controlling.

Anyone else see the art works? What do you think? Is it foretelling a grand conspiracy coming?


No, you dont know yet unless you can grasp it. A false implication can occur through making it a picture perfect deflective info on somebody. A false implication can occur through faking death or faking a strike. And the striker can be yet an ally your country's top officials lets do things since the ppl sure wouldn't be yet for extreme change. Understand an extreme change needed calls for drastic measures where time for waiting on the public is a not so pleasing idea.

posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 03:34 PM
Just my 6 cent:

Figuratively, day and hour: "They both are yet awesome, magnificant, historicial!"--Figurative

And a figurative non-total day and a figurative total hour are yet not any person, but two greatly hailed functions which are yet non-total/total.

What do ppl count a total for? Votes. They can be yet non-total/total.

"but my words (figurative two: the great day and the great hour) shall not pass a way."

^^Bottomline, a way I see this worldly eye dwelling amongst shall get the censors I describe inside. The figurative day and hour shall not pass (succeed) a way. It shall halt or fail or try and fail a (single) way which points single not both. So the day shall not pass. Never did I say it shall be yet then a better or worst thing for any persons, personally, but the great day and great hour shall be yet then ruined a way. It shall surely not go a total voting hours worth (which are yet considered figuratively the great day), but it, great single hour wise/ great single vote wise, shall surely be yet total a way. You never know where a single vote or whose single vote puts the rest null and void.

The single vote may be yet then a vote or may be yet then a non-vote vote. Both ways are yet votes still since choice plays a role. So fourth literal day after the 31st is the figuravitely helded great day and great hour. Both shall not pass, but just the great hour shall pass.

A single vote can be yet made through every man... Only through the vote being the exact same. Only way such may happen is if no man vote, which can happen, or if every man, and I mean every man, not only vote but vote the exact same, which can happen only through remote control puppetry concerning every man qualified to vote.



Om`i*na"tion\, n. [L. ominatio.] The act of ominating; presaging. [Obs.] --Fuller.

"Mark 13:

14But when ye shall see the 3omination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:
15And let him that is on the housetop not go down into the house, neither enter therein, to take any thing out of his house:

16And let him that is in the field not turn back again for to take up his garment.

17But woe to them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!"

^^days? Two! The figurative great day which shall not pass, and the figurative great day made following it.

And when those see them behold my art, then those may try that which I dare not say, but shall fail. None know the person behind this screen name yet. Nor will I say since work speaks for itself.

[edit on 1-11-2008 by Mabus]

posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:59 PM
Two with 2 strikes that dont want to see the 3rd.


^^1 implies first. 2 implies second. It is the 1st Nov current. Tomarrow is the 2nd Nov. See the omination unfolding...

Add 1 + 2 and you get 3. So 3rd Nov is where what I say, omination wise, should actualize completely mentally. Touching the 3rd is next the 4th (where the great day's omination actaulizes a better application for certain, but a worse application against other certain).

Life of a distant law:

Code 3. Attack formation.

Attack form(s)? Attack forming? Attack former?

new topics

log in